Texas Charter School LIES about enrollment to STEAL more money

Hyperwrx

New member
Texas contends charter schools inflated attendance

By Thomas Hargrove and Gavin Off
Scripps Howard News Service
Saturday, November 1, 2008

Texas officials want a refund for millions of tax dollars from schools that allegedly inflated attendance records, part of a national problem of absenteeism at schools operated by for-profit corporations.

Seven charter schools have more than $16 million in debts to the Texas Education Agency for allegedly inaccurate and inflated attendance reports, debts the state may never recoup. The state wrote off another $9 million in debts after 20 charter schools went out of business.

There is a national trend of states hiring companies to operate special "dropout-recovery" programs for students who are failing in the regular public schools. In most states, but not in Texas, these special schools are paid per student enrolled, not for how many students attend class.

"In the mid-1980s, Texas decided that attendance is important to achieving good performance in school," said Lisa Dawn-Fisher, deputy associate commissioner for school finance at the Texas Education Agency. "We only pay on the basis of warm bodies in the seats, so that the kids are receiving instruction. It is not enough just to enroll kids, but to actually teach them."

A 2003 study by the U.S. Department of Education found that the average absenteeism rate in Texas was 4.9 percent, the lowest for any state. Texas authorities said absenteeism recently has dropped to about 4 percent, still the nation's best.

But absenteeism actually averages about 9 percent in Texas' charter high schools, according to the Scripps Howard study.

Texas has aggressively sought refunds from charter schools, including $8 million for attendance claims at Houston's Gulf Shores Academy (GSA), where absenteeism averaged 30 percent every day during the 2004-05 school year.

"GSA reported students as having graduated, then listed those same students as still enrolled in the following academic year," the Texas Education Agency said in a lawsuit. "Almost since it began operating, GSA has failed to maintain necessary student attendance and financial records."

Texas state Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Houston, a lawyer who represents Gulf Shores Academy officials, said many charter schools in Texas have a difficult time learning how to enter attendance information into the state's complex computer system.

"All of these charter schools are required to file through the Public Education Information Management System," Dutton said. "Most traditional schools have full-time people who enter the data. But charter schools are stuck with doing this with just a part-time person. So the data are not correct."

Dawn-Fisher at the Texas Education Agency agreed that training could be part of the problem.

"There could be some devious intentions here," she said. "There could be some misunderstanding. I do see the need for some more training and technical assistance for charter-school holders, especially on the business side of the house -- their documentation requirements, what they need to be keeping track of."

But the fate of Gulf Shores became even less certain in March when principal Linda Johnson and her daughter, school employee Marian Johnson, were charged with felony counts of tampering with a government record after allegedly accepting $150 from undercover agents to document a class credit so a fictitious child could graduate from high school.

Dutton said he believes the case stemmed from the cutthroat competition between national chains of charter schools to sign up "at-risk" high-school dropouts in the Houston area.

"There are people who are going after their (Gulf Shores') students," Dutton said. "There are national organizations whose sole purpose is to make money off of these kids. I'm talking about the for-profit companies who run the charter schools for at-risk kids and who are in bed with a lot of the local school boards."

It was just one of several criminal and civil cases that have been brought against charter-school officials in Texas. Among them:

• Baptist minister Harold W. Wilcox and three family members were indicted in 2004 for defrauding the state and federal government of $3.3 million through fraudulent attendance records at the Prepared Table Charter School in Houston. Wilcox died before trial, but his relatives pleaded guilty and got jail sentences.

• Dolores Hillyer, former chief executive officer of Austin's Texas Academy of Excellence, was indicted last year for misspending charter-school funds for personal health care and private automobiles. She pleaded guilty in June and was placed on 10 years' probation. The school still owes the state about $1.8 million.

• The Renaissance Charter School of Irving and its affiliate, Heritage Academy of Dallas, were shut down in 2000 after state officials said the schools' erroneous attendance records caused a misallocation of $4.5 million. The Texas attorney general's office early this year obtained a court order barring Renaissance founder Donald L. Jones and two other employees from working in the state's charter-school system or from receiving state and federal grants.

"There have been a few bad actors that really have big problems," Dawn-Fisher said.

How for-profit charter schools are paid may influence their truancy rates. NonPublic Educational Services Inc. of Salem, Mass., operates six Richard Milburn Academy schools in Texas and three academies in Florida.

Absenteeism at Richard Milburn Academies averages 26 percent in Florida and 17 percent in Texas. Texas, unlike Florida and most states, pays charter schools on the basis of actual attendance, not enrollment.

Local Florida school boards have closed three other Milburn Academy centers for a variety of performance issues and, in all three cases, for complaints about poor attendance.

"We are focusing on the at-risk kids," Robert H. Crosby, company founder. "I like to say we've focused on the bottom of the barrel. I'm not taking the easy road on this. I have a total mission in life to help kids who are at risk. After all, I was an at-risk kid once myself."

"If you are a nonprofit group, you can do no wrong. But if you are for-profit, then you can do nothing right," Crosby said. "There is a bias against for-profits in education."

Crosby was asked whether the method of funding influences attendance.

"That's an interesting hypothesis. But that's for someone else to look at, not me," Crosby said. "In Florida, we are paid by enrollment, but so is every other school. Texas is one of the few states that pay by attendance. Most of the states pay by enrollment, fortunately."

Shut them down. Many charter schools are nothing more than business interested in making money when educating students should be their primary concern. Shut them down.
 
Charter schools are motivated by profits, so is the NEA.
There is a market for charter schools because parents feel Public schools failed.
In the mid 90's, private prisons were being built in Calif, with the promise of State contracts to house prisoners.
The most powerfull Union in California " Correctional Police Officers Assoc." went into full gear to make sure no contract would be awarded. `Accusations that they were unsafe for guards and prisoners....the safety of the community.....prisoners not being properly reformed and taught a trade... were leveled.. In this State if you wanted to be elected, the support of the CCPOA was/is needed. No contracts were awarded from the state, but the feds stepped in and contracted with them, without any problems. Contacting out to the Feds was exceptable to the CCPOA as long as they were not taking any of their future jobs.

To shut down all Charter Schools because a few have stolen from the State of , where ever' is crazy. Removing competition is great for the NEA but bad for the kids.Socialism at it's worst.
In the private sector, if you fail to produce, you lose your job. In the public?.. don't worry about it. In the private sector if the company can not compete, it's history, in the public, it continues unabated.
When one wants to ship documents or goods, we have a choice.FedX ,UPS or USPS. Who would you ship with ? At least you have a choice, why not give parents the choice of schools ? Is their a problem with some children getting a better education, does everything have to be equal? If it does, then lets pick the best schools , public or charter. If Charter schools prove to do the job better, close down all the public schools and contract out to the private sector schools.
I have been a union trades person all my life, retired now.All piping trades belong to the UA ,( United Association of pipe trades ) I still get the monthly magazine from them. It's goes straight in the trash when I recieve it. I swear if Joseph Stallin were alive, they would be supporting him for president.As a Union member I have no choice where I want my Union dues/contributions to go in political elections. They decide for me. In Calif not so many years ago ( maybe 10 )we had a Proposition on our election ballots dealing with this issue.The Unions dumped tons of money to see to it's defeat. The loser was me and others like me. They don't want me to have a choice, just like you don't want parents to have a choice.That is socialism. In the private sector , non union companies keep wages in check. Competition is a great thing in a free society.
 
You are incorrect.

In Arizona if a school doesn't meet AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) based on your yearly standardized testing they can and do replace teachers, administration, and even can have the school taken over by the state. In addition- teachers receive a voted upon yearly stipend based partly on how well their students test each year.

This isn't accountability?

If you are a lousy teacher- it catches up with you within a few years.

The Universities in the state are also raising the bar on graduate requirements for educators. to become a teacher requires a whole lot more than when I graduated from ASU.
 
Who puts together the AYP test ?
Is it parents, academia , or the NEA ? I am asking.
.

The best school district in calif., to the best of my knowledge is the Clovis Unified School district. I live 150 miles away from Clovis, but there success in the class room and on sports fields is well known. The secret to their system, no teacher unions.If a teacher doesn't perform up to their standards, they are gone. If a coach fails on the field or court, he's gone......No Tenure ...You could be hired today and fired next week.Hired 10 years ago, fired yesterday.


I do understand that a kid going to a " Blair Acdemey" De Mantha or Calvary Chapel has the advantage of parents who stress academics and can afford it.There are many parents , wanting the same for their child ,who can not afford it and are left wanting in the public schools.
If a Charter school can show positive results,at a reasonable price ,a parent should have a choice. It is their child, not the Governments, not the NEA, not mine nor yours.
Not all public schools are failures, not all charter schools are corrupt.
 
AYP is not a test. AYP is Adequate Yearly Progress or a measurement tool to decide if a school's students is making annual progress on standardized test. you are expected to go up a certain number of percentage points and reach a certain attendance percentage each year. The bar is raised slightly each year.

The AIMS is Arizona's standardized annual test. It is created by a conglomeration of teacher, parents, administration and people at the state dept of education (no direct influence by the NEA). It is what everything at public school is measured against.
 
Quote:
You are incorrect.

In Arizona if a school doesn't meet AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) based on your yearly standardized testing they can and do replace teachers, administration, and even can have the school taken over by the state.



You are correct in you interpetation of Arizona law, but you are wrong regarding the actual enforcement. The state has never taken over a school, and never will with the budget problems the state is facing. If they intended to enforce the law they surely could have found a few failing schools take over by now. Remember that all decisions are driven by the question "how are we going to pay for this". If the state was to take over a school they would surely fire the admin staff and the teachers that were not doing their jobs, but they would absolutely keep the teachers that were performing.




Quote:
The Universities in the state are also raising the bar on graduate requirements for educators. to become a teacher requires a whole lot more than when I graduated from ASU.

Very true
 
Quote:
The AIMS is Arizona's standardized annual test. It is created by a conglomeration of teacher, parents, administration and people at the state dept of education (no direct influence by the NEA). It is what everything at public school is measured against.



Luckily for the teachers the AIMS test was watered down a few years ago. When it was first created it had some real standards that were going to be very tough to meet.

Hyperwinx you need to change your handle to hyperagainstpvtshcools.
This thread was started about how some Texas charter schools are cheating the state of Texas out of some money. We all know that the wrong doings by a small percentage of any group only means that a few members of that group are doing illegal activities. The news will always carry anything illegal involving the schools, the teachers and the admin. Just last week a Dean of Students was arrested for embezzlement here at a major phoenix public high school. Even though it didn't involve public money, the news people were all over it. I even heard about it, and I don't watch local news or read the local paper. Just because one administrator at a school is arrested doesn't mean they are all involved in illegal activities. There are probably thousands of charter schools in Texas, and the article you posted mentioned maybe 8 at the most. It doesn't prove that they are all bad. If the truth was known, there are some very good charter schools.

The one thing we could point to when I use to be involved in public education is that charters could be quicker to expel students if they started to become problem students (e.g., gangbangers). This kept security issues at bay. If parents want to send their child to a charter for safety reasons, they should be allowed to. We have some pretty tough neighborhoods near downtown Phx.

I’m not saying all charters are good. I do know of an instance where a local charter was dumping their problem students after the 100 day count so the charter would get the state funding. The students were then showing up at the public school. This surely wasn’t right, but it happened.

Dude: do you job to the best of your ability and stop worrying. I understand why anyone in education would be worring with the cutbacks Az is making, but these cutbacks are surely going to be temporary. Once the economy starts to rebound, education funding will improve. The Charters are not going to take your job away. Public education has a whole lot to offer that the Charters can't. They never offer sports, special ed., band, ROTC, and varous other classes that don't involve the three R's. If the parents stay involved with their child's education, the kids will get a good education and can still play in the many extracurricular activities offered by public education.

Hang in there buddy
 
The article is apparently talking about charter schools that are taking the worst kids.

I've often heard teachers say that among their most frustrating problems is the fact that they have to try to teach good students while trying to manage "problem" students.

One would presume that among the reasons there is "...a national trend of states hiring companies to operate special "dropout-recovery" programs for students who are failing in the regular public schools" is to 1.save the school districts money and 2.to improve the quality of education in the "regular" schools.

As Aznative pointed out in another post, charter schools generally get 1/3-1/2 of the "normal" dollars per student allocated to regular public schools.

Getting the "bad eggs" out of the classroom should leave the remaining students with a much improved learning environment.

Seems a little strange to have a teacher complain when a state finds a solution that (probably) saves money and certainly makes the regular public school teacher's job easier.

By all means prosecute anyone breaking the law, but why would you want to throw the baby out with the bath water (or did Mikal nail it, re unionism)?



Quote:
Shut them down. Many charter schools are nothing more than business interested in making money when educating students should be their primary concern. Shut them down.



Legally, education isn't the "primary concern" of any public school district. The PRIMARY (first) concern is to comply with federal and state regulations (title 1, title 9, etc), having NOTHING TO DO WTH EDUCATION. If a school district didn't comply with the regs first, the administration would be out of a job.

Just a couple of years ago (and maybe still today?) the 2nd largest school district in the nation (L.A. Unified) was run by a Federal Judge whose ONLY mandate was desegregation.

Should we "shut them down"? (I say HECK YES!)



Here's another take on "for profit" schools in general, instead of a miniscule percentage of bad apples.

The New Trend In Education: For-Profit Schools
by Carrie Lips


This essay by Carrie Lips, a former Cato Institute policy analyst, is adapted from her Cato study "Edupreneurs: A Survey of For-Profit Education.

This fall, more than 50 million children went off for their first day of the new school year. They went dressed in their best clothes, armed with fresh notebooks and sharpened pencils, just as American children have been for decades.

But for some students, this school year will be different.

In Greensboro, N.C., 350 elementary school kids marched off to Greensboro Academy, where teachers use a back-to-basics approach that tries to instill traditional values by celebrating U.S. history and good citizenship.

In Springfield, Mass., more than 1,000 students began the school year at SABIS International Charter School. There, students encounter a curriculum designed to impart a global perspective as well as prepare them for competitive colleges.

In Bellevue, Wash., 122 elementary school students went to Chestnut Hill Academy where they receive more than just quality education during school hours. Chestnut Hill offers before- and after-school activities such as art, science and cooking in an environment designed to be a home away from home.

Those students are just a few of the approximately 100,000 who are attending K-12 schools run by for-profit companies.

Increasingly, entrepreneurs recognize that the public’s dissatisfaction with one-size-fits-all schools is more than just fodder for political debates. It is a tremendous business opportunity. Companies like National Heritage Academies, SABIS International and Bright Horizons Family Solutions are making it their business to meet the educational needs of America's diverse student population.

There are as many potential "niches" in this marketplace as there are disputes about public education. Should schools provide character education, and, if so, what values should be taught? What is the proper role of religion and multiculturalism in school? Should teachers use phonics or whole language instruction? Does sex education belong in the classroom?

All of these topics have been points of contention, and no wonder: Government-run schools must adopt the same rigid solution to each polarizing question. By contrast, in the competitive education marketplace, parents answer those questions by choosing a school that reflects their values and priorities.

Already a wide variety of for-profit schools offer different teaching methods, educational philosophies and areas of emphasis. But while demand is growing for alternative education providers, for-profit education companies still face obstacles to success. Companies attempting to start schools have large overhead costs and must contend with teachers unions typically hostile to for-profit schools. Companies managing charter schools face significant political risk: While charter schools currently are free from some of the regulations saddling public schools, they must consider the possibility that regulations will increase.

By far the greatest obstacle for the success of most for-profit schools is the public school monopoly, which deprives most parents of the freedom to choose an alternative school.

Today, an education marketplace exists only for parents with means. Low and middle-income families, after paying the taxes that support government-run schools, can’t afford to pay private tuition. That makes it difficult for for-profit schools to grow, and traps many low and middle-income children in substandard schools. School administrators and teachers have little incentive to improve because they know most parents must accept whatever services the local public school provides, no matter how poor those services may be.

If instead all parents had the power to choose a school for their child, then schools would be held accountable. Bad school would have to reform or they would close down. This is the market process, sometimes referred to as "creative destruction." Consumers vote with their feet, bad businesses fail, and others open in their place.

Critics of reforms giving parents control of their education dollars claim choice will leave poor children behind. But the sad truth is the current system has already left low-income children behind. Politicians like the Clintons and Gores may talk about the need to preserve public education, but they used their wealth to send their own children to private schools.

All children deserve an education marketplace as dynamic as the computer and biotech industries. The existing for-profit education marketplace provides a glimpse of what a thriving, competitive market for education might look like if the United States opened the education sector to competition.

Policymakers who want to improve education should pursue tax cuts, tuition tax credits and voucher programs that put education purchasing power in the hands of parents and encourage a vibrant for-profit education industry.
Also of interest
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top