Originally Posted By: shawn@moLooking at a 220 swft or .17 hmr for predators/varmit kind of iffy on both. 220 I have heard of barrels fouling quickly and don't I know if a 17 is big enough and have been Told wind effects the bullet badly... Anyone have these guns and could tell me what they think?
I've been running a Swift for over 25 years now and won't be without one. It is and always will be the king of the 22 centerfires. No one ever compares the 220 Swift to other 22 centerfires. It is the standard by which all others are judged. It's already been mentioned but if you're not a reloader the 22-250 is a better choice. If you're depending on factory ammo for the 220 Swift, all I can say is buy all of it you see every time you see it. It might be a very long time before you see it again.
If you reload, the Swift is the ticket. Some 4064 and any one of a huge list of bullets from 40-55 grains will make it happy. As for fouling, it fouls no more than any other high intensity round. A modicum of cleaning will keep it running happily for a lifetime. If you manage to shoot out a barrel, then you've gotten to do more shooting then most people will ever do. Consider yourself fortunate.
You didn't specify what exactly you varmint shooting plans were. Are your sniping P dogs and grounds squirrels, calling predators, fur hunting, long rang chucks (rock or wood)? These all have some bearing. If you're just going for ground squirrels and P dogs, a 17 HMR might suit you fine, although I expect it wouldn't be long before you were courting a longer range rifle. Predator hunting and fur calling demands a little more punch than the HMR produces. Yes it'll do a coyote or fox nicely, occasionally, but really is not the tool for the job. A Swift is suited for all the varmint applications. The 17 HMR, not so much. Just my opinion for what it's worth.