After Fiery Debate, ‘Warning Shot’ Bill Passes Florida House

Rocky1

New member
Quote:After Fiery Debate, ‘Warning Shot’ Bill Passes Florida House

March 21, 2014

After a nearly two-hour debate that focused on Florida’s controversial “stand your ground” law, the state House on Thursday easily passed a bill that would expand the self-defense law to include threatened use of force — including showing a gun or firing a warning shot.

The measure (HB 89) by Rep. Neil Combee, R-Polk City, would extend immunity to people who threaten to use force in self-defense — the same immunity already in law for those who actually shoot people in response to perceived threats.

It passed in a 93-24 vote after a floor debate filled with the names of people associated with gun-related crimes that sparked public outrage in Florida, especially Marissa Alexander, a Jacksonville woman who faces the possibility of 60 years in prison for firing a shot into the wall during a domestic dispute.

The proposal has become known as the “warning shot” bill, although Combee said Thursday that people who call it that “do a terrible disservice to the general public if they put the notion out that this bill somehow or other authorizes or encourages warning shots, because it does not. We specifically did not put ‘warning shot’ in the bill.”

The omission of those words bothered Rep. Kionne McGhee, D-Miami, who questioned how HB 89 would have helped Alexander.

Most of the debate Thursday, however, centered on an amendment by House Minority Leader Perry Thurston, D-Fort Lauderdale, that sought to repeal the “stand your ground” law. While Democrats and Republicans went back and forth about the law, few of the arguments were new.

“I thought we had this settled,” said Rep. Dennis Baxley, an Ocala Republican who sponsored the House version of “stand your ground” in 2005. The House Criminal Justice Subcommittee in November rejected a bill (HB 4003) by Rep. Alan Williams to repeal “stand your ground.”

Thurston filed the amendment, he said in an email before the vote, because under the law, “Innocent people have been killed and the perpetrators have been able to walk away. … ‘Stand your ground’ encourages citizens to use force if they ‘feel’ threatened even if no real threat exists.”

Rep. Reggie Fullwood, D-Jacksonville, pointed to black mothers who warn their teenage sons, “Be careful, because a black boy’s life is not as valuable.”

The law “may work for your community, but it’s not working for ours,” Fullwood, an African American, said to other House members.

But Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fort Walton Beach, who famously vowed that “not one [beeep] comma” of the law would be changed, took issue with such arguments by the law’s opponents.

“In 90 percent of the cases where there is an African American decedent, the shooter — or killer — is also African American,” Gaetz said. “While African Americans constitute about 17 percent of the population in the state of Florida, they account for over 31 percent of assertions of the ’stand your ground’ defense. …And African Americans are 8 percent more likely to prevail when asserting a ’stand your ground’ defense than Caucasians.”

He said a wider sample size, not a handful of cases that have attracted attention, would show no racial disparity under the law.

Thurston’s amendment failed in an 83-31 vote.

The final version of Combee’s bill contained an amendment, passed Wednesday, that would limit access to court records in self-defense cases. The amendment, filed by Gaetz, would allow people found to have used justifiable force in a “stand your ground” hearing to have their court records expunged.

The Senate version of the bill (SB 448) could be approved next week.

While Combee’s bill drew heavy debate, another gun-related bill with a distinctive nickname — the “Pop-Tart” bill — passed in minutes by a vote of 98-17. Sponsored by Baxley, the proposal (HB 7029) would prevent children from being disciplined for simulating guns while playing or for wearing clothes that depict firearms. It draws its nickname from a widely reported news story about a Maryland 7-year-old who was suspended from school last year for chewing his breakfast pastry into the shape of a gun.

The bill attracted bipartisan support in the House from Democrats, who are often critical of “zero tolerance” school discipline policies, and from gun-friendly Republicans.


http://www.northescambia.com/2014/03/after-fiery-debate-warning-shot-bill-passes-florida-house


Ain't it a damm shame when you have to legislate common sense into existence!!
closedeyes.gif


However, it does make me proud that our legislators have seen fit to do so!!! One can only hope that all of yours see fit to follow suit.
 
Oh yes... and, before we get too far gone here...

Quote:The omission of those words bothered Rep. Kionne McGhee, D-Miami, who questioned how HB 89 would have helped Alexander.


As some of you may or may not have guessed in reading that:

Yes - Kionne McGhee is black. http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/details.aspx?MemberId=4555
Yes - Marissa Alexander is black. https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&q=Marissa%20Alexander

NO - The law would not have helped Marissa Alexander's case regardless, even if those words had been included. She left the residence and the threat of violence; he did not leave the house. She retrieved her gun from her car, returned to the residence, reengaged her ex/boyfriend in argument, AND THEN fired the warning shot into the sheetrock wall, with reckless disregard for the children in other room(s) of the house.

She does not have a self-defense or stand your ground plea, period. She left the threat and returned to it armed. The black community, the liberals, and the press are trying to manipulate her case into a Stand Your Ground / Self Defense case and it's not. They're arguing the exact opposite of what they claimed in George Zimmerman's case in doing so. And, the fact is, earlly local reports indicated that the charges were not brought over firing the warning shot in the presence of the boyfriend, as much as they were for firing a shot with reckless disregard for the children's lives in the home at the time.
 
One of the late night people was talking about the little boy who pointed his finger. He said that no notice was given to the fact that he had 9 other weapons. Do any states still have retreat laws,even from the home? If you can't stand in your home where are you supposed to go?
 
Yes there are a few states that still have not adopted even a Castle Doctrine into law...

Quote:States with weak or no specific castle law

These states uphold castle doctrine in general, but may rely on case law instead of specific legislation, may enforce a duty to retreat, and may impose specific restrictions on the use of deadly force:

District of Columbia

Nebraska - a bill was introduced in January 2012 that allowed deadly force against a person who broke into a house or occupied vehicle or who tried to kidnap someone from a house or vehicle; however, the bill was revised to include only an affirmative defense from lawsuits pertaining to justifiable use of force.[23]

New Mexico

South Dakota - "Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is." See South Dakota Codified Laws 22-16-34 (2005).[24]

Vermont[25]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine#States_with_weak_or_no_specific_castle_law


Other states,, while having a Castle Law still have a required to retreat stipulation in said law, (New York, New Jersey...), and the law only applies when retreat is not an option. Many Castle Doctrines have other extraneous stipulations attached if you go down the list there on Wikipedia. Some require you to determine the attackers intent, some require you to determine the attacker is in possession of a deadly weapon before you can use deadly force, the definition of one's castle varies from state to state, and some declare that a guest in your home cannot claim Castle Doctrine Defense... it is not as cut and dried as it may seem with Castle Doctrine in place.
 
I don't think I have any place to retreat to if I am at home. My home is my last sanctuary. I can understand a shooting needs to be investigated but it's not right to have to abandon your home just cause someone else wants your stuff.
 
Back
Top