AOL cuts benefits, blames Affordable Care Act

Rocky1

New member
Quote:

AOL cuts benefits, blames Affordable Care Act

Tech firm blames health care changes for changes in 401(k) program

Author: By Tami Luhby

Published On: Feb 06 2014 04:36:27 PM EST Updated On: Feb 06 2014 09:17:43 PM EST

REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -
AOL became the latest company to blame the Affordable Care Act for cutting back on employee benefits.

The tech firm will now pay its 401(k) company match only to employees who are active on Dec. 31 of that year, as opposed to in their paychecks throughout the year. So those who leave the company before the end of the year will forfeit the match.

AOL CEO Tim Armstrong blamed $7.1 million in additional Affordable Care Act costs the company is facing this year. Had the company not made the change in its 401(k) payments, employees would have seen their health insurance costs increase, he told CNN Thursday.

Armstrong did not provide a lot of specifics about what aspects of the Affordable Care Act were pushing up the company's health care costs, but said it was one factor affecting the 401(k) restructuring.

"The Obamacare Act and some of the changes that happened there had increases in our health care costs," Armstrong told CNN. "We had to make a choice whether we pass those on or whether we took other benefits and reduce them."

Some employees will still see their premiums rise, depending on the plan they picked, though AOL "ate a huge piece of the increase."

The news came on a day when AOL announced 2013 was "its most successful year in the last decade," reporting revenues of $2.3 billion.

AOL's move makes it the latest in a string of companies to change their benefits because of the Affordable Care Act. A few weeks ago, Target said it will stop offering health insurance to part-timers and instead help them buy coverage on the state and federal exchanges. Last year, United Parcel Service and University of Virginia said they are dropping coverage for employees' spouses that have access to benefits elsewhere because of the Affordable Care Act.

Here are the major Affordable Care Act fees and taxes that employers say will raise their costs:

Transitional reinsurance fee: This fee will be imposed on employers for the next three years and will go toward helping the state-based insurance exchanges pay for large claims. The fee will be $63 per insured member in 2014, but is expected to decrease in the latter two years.

Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute fee: This charge will go to pay for a new agency tasked with giving patients a better understanding of the prevention, treatment and care options available, and the science that supports those options. Employers were charged $1 per insured person in 2013 and will pay $2 in 2014. The fee then increases with inflation in health care spending for the next five years.

Health insurer fee: This annual fee is aimed at helping pay for the implementation of ACA. It will be about 2.5 percent of total premiums in 2014 and is expected to go up to 4 percent by 2017. Beyond that, it will rise with the growth in premiums. Insurers are expected to pass this fee through to employers.

'Cadillac' tax: Starting in 2018, employers who offer rich benefit plans -- where the total premium will cost more than $10,200 for an individual plan or $27,500 for family coverage -- will have to pay the so-called Cadillac tax, a 40 percent tax on the amount over the threshold. This tax is prompting companies to shift more medical expenses onto employees, which not only brings down the price of the premiums, but also pushes employees and their spouses to consider other options available to them.

Individual mandate: Also adding to employer costs is the Affordable Care Act requirement that Americans obtain insurance or face a penalty starting in this year. That will prompt many employees who had opted out of their company's coverage to sign up.

Aside from new Affordable Care Act fees and taxes, the growth of health care costs has been at record low levels for several years. Annual premiums -- including both employers' and employees' shares -- rose only 4 percent in 2013, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET) 2013 Employer Health Benefits Survey.


http://www.news4jax.com/health/health-ca...dr/-/index.html
 
Companies are using the ACA as an out to screw their employees over at their own expense. Hopefully one day it will be a crime for companies who continually take aim at employee benefits.
 
Originally Posted By: JoshuaNCompanies are using the ACA as an out to screw their employees over at their own expense. Hopefully one day it will be a crime for companies who continually take aim at employee benefits.

WTH???
 
Originally Posted By: JoshuaNCompanies are using the ACA as an out to screw their employees over at their own expense. Hopefully one day it will be a crime for companies who continually take aim at employee benefits.


You can thank the Obama Administration for giving the companies this tool to leverage screwing the employees!!

When I look at all of the regulations and B_S_ the government has imposed upon the business owner in today's world, I have no desire to own a business, have an employee, or deal with any of it. Personally, I see a cash only business and a $5000/year income on my part. You get insurance for $10/month, qualify for SNAP, WIC, WHATEVER, and don't have to pay any taxes.
 
JoshuaN, I have no idea of your background or experience, but having worked for over 50 years in a variety of businesses, at various levels, there is one truth that is constant...Companies have to make a profit, or they don't survive and over the years, competition has gotten much more intense in almost every field...

Your claim that they 'screw over' their employees is slightly unfair as a general statement...The most valuable asset that any company has is their employee...They have training invested, they rightfully expect the employee should be a representative of the company and exhibit the highest degree of loyalty, as well as effort, in exchange for their pay and experience..

Over the years, I've watched various regulations take a very negative effect on the operation of many companies, whether it's due to ACA, OSHA, EPA, or any number of others with cryptic initials...The changes in the Tax Code alone is enough to drive many businesses out of existence...Most of the regulations that are instituted come with a financial cost that eats into a companies profits and it usually means that benefits employees are used to receiving, are diminished..

I can remember when company benefits were almost unheard of and you worked what your boss demanded in order to get the job done to his satisfaction and were grateful for the chance...If it took an extra hour or a Saturday morning to meet a deadline, it was going to happen..There might be a Christmas bonus if the company was flush and it only got that way by every employee's efforts...

If you want to blame someone, take a hard look at our governments bureaucratic regulations and costs...
 
Just a guess but most companies didn't provide benefits because they had to. They did it to get and to keep good employees. The Obama care system is designed to eventually put ALL the health insurance companies out of business period. Just the first step.
 
Originally Posted By: Mr Potato HeadJust a guess but most companies didn't provide benefits because they had to. They did it to get and to keep good employees. The Obama care system is designed to eventually put ALL the health insurance companies out of business period. Just the first step.

That is coming to an end, the employee can partially blame themselves for a good portion of the death of benefits. Today's employee doesn't hold the same level of loyalty to the employer like they did prior to the 60's and 70's. Today employees job hop, always looking for the greener pasture. As one employee quits, another is hired, the employer doesn't have to be loyal and tale care of employees, because the employee is not loyal to the employer.

The bottom line, the profit is more important to owners and management than their employees. To many in management are the same way, here today, and gone tomorrow to find that greener pasture, they are willing to lie and screw over their subordinates, to advance their own careers. They reap what they sow...
 
I had to go to town so I stopped by my old job. I have been gone from there about 3 years. Most of the people I knew were gone. One man was on his last day after 15 years there. The few old employees were so blue I felt bad for them. turnover has taken 2/3 of former long time employees. I had just talked to one of the supervisors a few days ago and he was saying he would like to work 4 more years. He said today he thought he would go ahead and retire. The company used to be run by people who had climbed the ladder to management. Now it is run by bean counters who know not one thing about the operation of the business. My friend said they would spend 100 dollars to save one. One reason so many are losing their job or being forced out is because they have been there so long they have toped out in pay and benefits. By replacing them with younger people and paying $9.00 hr, and the fact that it takes five years to get full benefits they are saving money and losing customers by the drove because of a shortage of people with experience. I expect them to be bankrupt in a couple of more years.
 
Originally Posted By: JoshuaNCompanies are using the ACA as an out to screw their employees over at their own expense. Hopefully one day it will be a crime for companies who continually take aim at employee benefits.


Several thoughts on that....there is an element of truth in your claim, some companies have always screwed their employees, but the ACA has little to do with it. These companies would be doing it regardless of whether or not Obamacare had been enacted. I also happen to think "employee benefits" have been the undoing of a number of companies. I know that statement is not going to be popular with some folks, but just look at the "benefits" some of the auto makers were giving their employees.....and look where GM ended up. I believe in a free market, and here is how I envision it....if I start up a company and do not wish to be fair to my employees and give then a wage/benefit package that is competitive with other similar businesses in the area, then I'm probably not going to have employees that will do me a good job, allowing me to make money. On the other hand, you cannot give away all your profits in the form of employee benefits, or else you will soon go under. There has to be a fair compromise for both sides....but, employees need to remember that the business must make a profit in order to keep providing them with a paycheck.
 
Back
Top