Cetme rifles....true H&Ks?

bowhunter57

Well-known member
Cetme rifles are considerably less expensive than the model HK93.

Are Cetme rifles true H&K rifles?
What are the differences between these two rifles?

Your opinions and experience is appreciated.
Good hunting, Bowhunter57
 
HK-93 is 5.56 NATO cal (maybe you meant HK-91 which is 7.62 ?)

Cetme is 7.62 NATO, Spanish origin.

The Cetme's you are seeing are parts guns, assembled here in the US from Surplus and NOS foreign arsenals with Rcvrs and few "evil" parts manufactured here to make them legal. Therefore little collector value. They have a sheetmetal receiver (not the Cheeesy aluminum one you will run across on G3 rebuilds) just like the original.

HK-91 and 93's are now "banned" from import and are from the factory, these have more collector value because of it. Supply and demand.

Ive shot the CETME and its a good rifle. You will want to "Cycle the action" about 200 times to break it in before you go to the range for the first time with it. The coating on the inside of the rcvr needs to be "broken-in". No big whoop.

under 400$ for a CETME or 2100$ for a HK-91...
easy choice if you want something to go out and play with and not just occupy safe-space for limited fondling /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

==================================
From Cruffler.com (Mil surp addicts)

Type: Self loading rifle
System of Operation: Delayed Blowback
Caliber: 7.62mm NATO
Capacity: 20 round detachable box magazine
Sights, front: Elevation adjustable post
Sights, rear: Four position elevation flip aperture
Length: 40.75"
Barrel length: 19.75"
Weight: 9.7 lbs
Retail Price: $379 or something now

HISTORICAL DATA
The last great German assault rifle design of World War Two, the Sturmgewehr 45 (StG45) never saw series production, due in large part to Germany's defeat and subsequent occupation by Allied forces. As did many prominent Germans, infamous Nazis (and sometimes people who were a little of both), the StG45's designer, Dr. Vorgrimmler fled the defeated nation. Dr. Vorgrimmler's problem was to find a country that would willingly accept a German refugee, especially one with a substantial connection to the Nazi war industry. (The recent unpleasantness had left most of Europe, if not the world, with a certain predisposition toward former German officials. . .) Franco's Spain, whose existence was due in large part to the aid provided by German arms during the Spanish Civil War, welcomed the doctor with open arms.
Dr. Vorgrimmler, and what staff he brought with him from Germany, were put to work in the Centro de Estudios Tecnicos y Materiales Especiales (CETME), or the Center for the Study of Special Technologies and Materials, in Madrid. By the early 1950's, Dr. Vorgrimmler's design team had developed a new select fire rifle for the Spanish military called the CETME Modelo A. The Modelo A was chambered for a cartridge known as the 7.9x40mm, a developmental evolution of the German wartime 7.92mm Kurz round (7.92x33mm), and shared the StG45's roller-locked delayed blow back action. Technically, the CETME Modelo A was a great success. However, the world, or at least the non-communist world was, under the influence of the United States Army Ordnance Corps (more specifically, under the onerous influence of Colonel Rene Studler of the Ordnance Corps), moving towards a uniform adoption of what was to become the 7.62mm NATO cartridge.

The Spanish despite not being members of NATO, saw the writing on the wall (and the advantages of cartridge uniformity with potential allies), and CETME brought out the CETME Modelo B. The CETME Modelo B was little more than a product improved Modelo A chambered for a 7.62x51mm cartridge. We say a 7.62x51mm cartridge instead of the 7.62mm NATO because the Modelo B was actually chambered for two distinct cartridges! The first of these cartridges was what we'll call the 7.62x51mm CETME. This round fired a 112 grain bullet at between 2,450 and 2,500 feet per second (fps) muzzle velocity, and generated significantly lower chamber pressures (approximately 42,000 psi) than the NATO round. The CETME round represented a compromise to the Spanish commitment to the original intermediate round concept as embodied in the 7.92mm Kurz and the need for interoperability with allied forces. The other cartridge was the standard 7.62mm NATO round, with its 147 grain bullet, 2750 +/- 50 fps muzzle velocity, and 50,000 psi chamber pressure. By switching bolt groups for one with a different angle on the locking piece cam, and switching springs for a set with thicker diameter wire, the CETME Modelo B could be converted to fire the 7.62mm NATO.

The final iteration of the 7.62mm CETME rifles was the CETME Modelo C. The Modelo C was designed to fire only the 7.62mm NATO cartridge, and was the most handsome of the group, with stock and handguards made from poplar wood (hence the rifle's nickname of "Chopo" or poplar). Like all delayed blowback firearms, the chamber is fluted to aid in extraction.

The CETME was later produced under license by Heckler & Koch as the G3 rifle; indeed, all G3 rifles produced up to 1961 were required to have the word "CETME" imprinted on the receiver. The G3 incorporates subtle changes to elements such as the sights, magazine and furniture, but it is functionally identical to the CETME.

This rifle served the Spanish armed forces (and those in several other parts of the world) well into the 1980's and 1990's when it was finally replaced by the Heckler & Koch G36 5.56mm assault rifle. All military CETME rifles were delayed blowback select fire weapons.

THE US MARKET
CETME rifles have always had a strong following in the United States. In fact, a semiautomatic version of the CETME was once imported as the CETME Modelo Sport. However, these rifles now command prices upwards of $2,600.00 which places them out of the reach of most shooters. Likewise, the expense, rarity, and effort involved to legally own one has placed select-fire CETME's similarly out of reach.

In 1999, St. Albans, Vermont and Boca Raton, Florida based Century International Arms purchased tooling from Tempe, Arizona based Special Weapons, Inc. which had formerly been used by Special Weapons to produce high quality investment cast stainless steel (legally) semiautomatic G3 rifle receivers. Additionally, CRUFFLER.COM was told by Century that the company purchased a large number of unissued and excellent condition issued CETME rifles as well as the attendant spare parts. Century engineers made subtle changes to the Special Weapons tooling, the most prominent being the inclusion of a CETME style rear sight base (the CETME iron sights differ substantially from those of the G3, hence the need for a differently machined rear sight base). The CETME rifles, upon arrival in the United States, were disassembled and the receivers destroyed in accordance with federal law. Century then built new CETME style rifles by assembling the parts kits onto the newly produced stainless steel receivers, retrofitting the required number of US made parts to comply with the law, and refinishing the guns. These are the firearms now being offered for sale to US shooters.

PRODUCT REVIEW
OK, we admit it. The CRUFFLER.COM staff are suckers for Spanish firearms, as we think they are among the best kept secrets on the US market. Between the staffers here there are an embarrassing number of Astras, Stars, Llamas, Rubys, Spanish Mausers, and the like. In fact, we're among the few people we know not born in Spain who can properly pronounce "Bonifacio Echeverria." So, when Bryan, the sales manager at AIM (AIM is one of the best distributors of military surplus firearms in the USA, in terms of price, service, and product) let us know that CETME's had arrived, we practically tripped over ourselves to get one!

Two days after we placed the order, the BBT arrived, bearing the long cardboard box containing the rifle.

Upon opening the box and giving the rifle a once over, we were quite pleased. The gun was finished in an attractive matte black enamel or polymer finish, while the internal working parts were left in what appeared to be their original grey parkerizing. The stock and handguards were made from beautifully stained and figured poplar wood. In an nutshell, this was one of those moments when you say to yourself "if this gun shoots as good as it looks, it's going to be an absolute tack driver." Finish was of the baked on enamel type was simply beautiful. It was marked on the side of the magazine well with the manufacturer's name (Century International Arms), the place of manufacture (St. Albans, Vermont), the model (CETME), and the caliber for which it was chambered (.308 (7.62)).

The rifle came with an original CETME 20 round magazine. CETME magazines can be distinguished from similar looking G3 magazines as they are slightly curved (however, G3 magazines will function in the rifle). Seating the magazine required a healthy tap on the baseplate. Similarly, removing the magazine required depressing the magazine latch button and then rotating the magazine forward out of the receiver as one would do with an M14, FAL, or AK series rifle.

On the "My! Isn't that neat!" front, the CETME comes with a cleaning kit built into the rifle. At the front of the cocking tube, beneath the front sight is a flat metal disk. Immediately behind this disk are two opposed holes in the cocking tube. A drift (or the nose of a cartridge) can be used to depress two detents visible through the holes. Once depressed, the disk can be drawn towards the muzzle, revealing an aluminum tube with a screw top. Unscrewing the top reveals a weighted pull through, a bore brush, and plastic ampoules of oil.

CETME rifles, like their G3 cousins, disassemble from the rear. The two pins are pushed out of the bottom of the buttstock where it attaches to the receiver, and the butt can then be withdrawn to the rear, taking the operating spring and guide rod with it. The pistol grip and trigger pack should then either fall off or be easily removed. At this point, the muzzle can be raised and a rearward tug on the cocking handle should be sufficient to send the bolt and bolt carrier group out the rear of the receiver.

Accuracy
The CETME offered more than acceptable accuracy. We used a standard NRA B-2 target with a 3" black center. Shots were fired at a uniform range of 50 yards (the maximum length possible at the NRA range). The rear sight was set for 200 meters, as the aperture was preferred to the 100 meter battle sight notch. Four shooters, with differing experience levels, tested the gun. The results were surprisingly uniform: The pattern was high, as was to be expected when using 200 meter sights at 50 yards, and roughly centered, with the groups showing a tendency to print slightly to the right. The best group consisted of four rounds right on top of one another, with the worst being about three inches and consisting of ten rounds. Average was about one and a half to two inches, which translates to three to four minutes of angle. This level of accuracy was consistent with all ammunition types tested. This was well within specification; most 7.62mm NATO battle rifles are designed to shoot to three or four minutes of angle when new. Additionally, since none of the testers qualified as match grade shooters, we believe that the gun is capable of significantly better accuracy
than we achieved.

The CETME we tested compares well with FAL's, M14 style rifles, and G3 style rifles that we have previously fired.

Recoil
This was the biggest surprise of the day. Having fired HK 91's and G3's in the past, we expected the CETME's recoil to be similarly punishing and unpleasant. Nothing could be further from the truth! Recoil was experienced as a mild push that was not unpleasant to even the most sensitive of the testers. We fired an HK 91 for comparison, and found it to be as unpleasant as we remembered. We cannot fully explain this difference in felt recoil. However, we do note that the CETME does have a substantial muzzle brake, that it weighs noticeably more than the HK 91, and that it has a soft rubber buttpad. Whether there are systemic or mechanical factors that contribute to making the CETME pleasant to shoot, we cannot say. However, all testers agreed that the test CETME was among the most comfortable rifles chambered for 7.62mm NATO that we've had the pleasure to shoot.

Reliability
This is the fly in the ointment. A very little fly to be sure, but a fly nonetheless. Let us start by saying that we experienced no failures to feed, extract, or eject when operating the rifle in self loading mode. However, chambering the first round in the magazine was often problematic, with the bolt stopping about halfway to the closed position. We attribute this to Century's refinishing process. While the parkerized bolt contrasts nicely with the black enamel receiver, and the parkerized magazine looks great, that self same parkerizing provides a rough to the touch surface that greatly increases the friction between critical moving parts (i.e. bolt/carrier to receiver and follower to magazine body and loaded rounds). When compared, the HK 91 bolt/carrier was found to be glassy smooth to the touch, as was the magazine interior. This can be overcome in the short run by vigorously retracting the bolt for loading, and we expect the rifle to "wear in" very well, thus obviating the problem. Nevertheless, we would have liked it if Century had paid a little more attention to the functional mechanics and a little less to aesthetics when refinishing and assembling the rifle.


CONCLUSION - "G-D gave you a soul, your parents a body, your country a rifle. Keep all of them clean." (from the Spanish Paratrooper Creed)
The CETME, when all is said and done, is a neat rifle. It has all the EBR* coolness of an H&K G3 with what we believe are superior aesthetics, superior recoil reduction, and a bit more interesting history. It is accurate, reliable (once you get the first round chambered), and currently the market is practically overflowing with G3 spare parts, magazines, and 7.62x51mm ammunition.
 
Hello All
Bowhunter, I dont want to pee in your cornflakes, BUT my opinion of HK-type rifles which the CETME apparently is, is not nearly as enthusiastic as the review Robb posted. So read his post, then read mine, and you'll get both sides.
[Sorry Robb, I really dont want to pee in your cornflakes either, sincerest apologies in advance if I PO you. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif ]
Never owned or shot a CETME, but let me tell you a little about my own personal experience with the HK-91, as they appear to be similar. Years ago I owned one. It was a real HK, had a special "woodland camo" pattern to it. This turned out to be a costly mistake. In fact, it was/is the BIGGEST screw up I have ever had buying rifles. Because I learned what is not told to you in articles such as the above.

1) The chamber on the HK is FLUTED. Picture an Rem Sendero barrel inside out, and that is what they give you to support that case. The German military seemed to think there was a extraction advantage, which I find odd. The M14 did fine with a normal chamber. Anyhoo, dont even bother trying to reload for this type of chamber. The shells are so deformed due to the way they expand in the fluting that a FL die will not correct them. If you can find them. They launch them into the next county.
2) Triggers. Ever pull start a lawnmower? Similar.
3) Accuracy. I giggle at these gunwriters. 3 to 4 MOA? A Wal-Mart cheapie 308 with a quality factory round should group betweenn 1/2 to 1/4th of that at a minimum. 308's are nice accurate cartridges most of the time. BTW, the 4 MOA figure is realistic IMHO. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
4) Strength of design. The roller-locked bolt is OK in theory, where the rubber meets the road, however, there is a problem. You see the rollers not only lock the bolt, but they help keep the bolt carrier straight in its trip down the reciever. So if [read: WHEN] one of them gets a little sticky, you have a hardened bearing scraping against the un-hardened reciever. This scraping action wears your reciever away. And those miraculous 4" groups open WAY up, you start to get feed failures, and every other problem you can think of. Now the HK engineers know all about this. Their solution? Three sizes of rollers. You put in bigger as your reciever gets progressivly worse. So much for German engineering.

George Bush banned the HK, and then I got mine, before "the worst happened". By the time Clinton banned a bunch of domestic semi's my HK was gone and good riddance. I never thought the shooting public was missing much. And it only cost me $1300 to find that out. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
 
Tackdriver... I was having eggs and bacon anyway !

I can vouch for how bad they ding-up brass and how far they throw em too ! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif Which is not good if you reload. Me, I just feed critters like that Mil-surp ammo, berdan primed, etc...

Admittedly, Unless you plan on going into combat, most Mil-spec'd general purpose semi-autos are going to be mainly "fun guns" focusing on rate of fire and field-use with adverse conditions. If your going to use them for hunting (you didnt say), know theyre limitations and yours.

The trigger on the CETME I have shot, is two stage, not real crisp, probably around 8lbs pull... Like most military rifles.
 
Robb/Scottsdale and Tackdriver,
Thank you VERY much for the GREATLY informative replys!

I was nothing more than curious about the Cetme and am more interested in the reviews I've recieved about the FN-FAL rifle.

This is going to be a coyote/groundhog rifle. I'd rather have a Bushmaster M4, but the price tag is way over what I'd consider. I've found FN-FALs for $399.00.

Pelt damage isn't a concern, but ricochets are, so that's why I'd be using a Hornady 110gr. V-Max bullet. I used to hunt with a Remington 788 in .308 and that bullet loaded at 3040 f.p.s. would cleanly kill any varmints with out the concerns of ricochets, resulted from pass throughs. I feel this explanation is necessary to ward off any felt concern for "spray and pray" type shooting on my part. I simply prefer the semi-auto action for quick follow up shots. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Good hunting, Bowhunter57
 
Bowhunter,

I own both the “HK-91 A1” and a “Cetme Black Widow .308 Winchester”.

I have to say that both of my rifles shoot about the same … Great accuracy … Same groupings.

Someone made a comment about triggers and cranking a lawnmower. That's unfortunate for him. He must have a Lemon, because mine and several others at the range don't have that problem. My triggers on both rifles feel fairly similar even though the mechanisms are different. Both of my triggers "crank" just fine. More like turning the key on a Cadillac than cranking a mower.

No problems with the Cetme, though you do have to run a few hundred rounds through them before they smooth out.

I can't tell much difference in either rifle.

Buddies at the gun range can't tell much different either.

Sorry if I peed in every one's cornflakes.

Otter
 
You should take a peek at the PTR-91. It's an all new firearm from what I hear and it's made right here in the good ol' USA.

PTR= Precision Tactical Rifle and it is offered by J.L.D. Enterprises,Inc. They retail for about $750.

faa7042d.jpg
 
The fluted chambers in the Cetme/HK are a result of the delayed roller lock system. The flutes allow for less cartridge chamber surface contact after the chamber pressures have receeded and help get the mechanism moivng by allowing for easier extraction. They do ding brass, though. If you plan to shoot reloads in them, its an issue.

They work great with the surplus 7.62 NATO ammo which can be found in lots of places, and its generally cheaper than reloading. I have one and its a real blast to plink with.

Take care - BCB
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top