I thought you said you did reasearch? That isn't exactly what I'd rely on as a reputable source. I do like the part where he rails out against the Pledge of Allegiance. It lends an air of credibility to the rest of his information. Looking up one website hardly constitutes research. Everybody is an expert on the internet.
Court decisions say nothing about the falibility/infalibility of the canine sense of smell. It's simply an opinion based on the presentation of evidence. Or excluding evidence based on how it was obtained or handled. If a K9 hadn't smelled the drugs the case wouldn't be in court in the first place.
The smell of a human walking through an area and a human being in an area are two completely different things. By your logic wary coyotes would be corraled in by the paths of every person that walked through an area without scent eliminator.
Buy all of that crap you want. It's great for game hunting, but that expensive perfume is wasted on a coyotes nose.
Nate
BTW The whole dog reacting to a command thing is propaganda at its finest. K9 handlers are constantly giving commands throughout a search. The dog just does the sniffing, the handler leads the search.
