GS
New member
I am curious to know how you feel about remote capabilities of callers. I easily understand the advantages that remote control gives you in a typical calling stand. I have felt that 100 yard capability is probably ideal for the average calling scenario with an occassional 200 yard need occurring in more windy or open conditions.
What I have a harder time understanding is why one would desire 400+ yard capability. Isn't that self defeating? Have we slipped into a mind set where we feel that if 100 yards is good, then 400 must be really good....but do we need it?
Maybe some of you would be willing to describe some of the scenarios you have used the callers under that needed 400 yards. I would think most places east of the Mississippi could get by with far less capability compared to those further west.
Additionally I would encourage you to share your thoughts about the philosophy of the use of remote capabilities. When we came out with the RC-1 years ago for our 512 caller I used it all the time because I did not want to have to wrap up that "damned" speaker cord. I would use it at 20yards in many spots simply for convenience sake. As I used it at further distances, for me it got to where I felt a degree of the fun go out of calling. I came to rediscover, and value, the excitement and challenge of getting them "in close". Some of that could have been caused by the fact that I am a real bad rifle shooter and really enjoyed more taking them with shotguns.
That leads me to ask the question "just why do we want to use remotely controlled callers"? I am not trying to create a "taste great...less filling" debate so check your emotions at the door please.
What I have a harder time understanding is why one would desire 400+ yard capability. Isn't that self defeating? Have we slipped into a mind set where we feel that if 100 yards is good, then 400 must be really good....but do we need it?
Maybe some of you would be willing to describe some of the scenarios you have used the callers under that needed 400 yards. I would think most places east of the Mississippi could get by with far less capability compared to those further west.
Additionally I would encourage you to share your thoughts about the philosophy of the use of remote capabilities. When we came out with the RC-1 years ago for our 512 caller I used it all the time because I did not want to have to wrap up that "damned" speaker cord. I would use it at 20yards in many spots simply for convenience sake. As I used it at further distances, for me it got to where I felt a degree of the fun go out of calling. I came to rediscover, and value, the excitement and challenge of getting them "in close". Some of that could have been caused by the fact that I am a real bad rifle shooter and really enjoyed more taking them with shotguns.
That leads me to ask the question "just why do we want to use remotely controlled callers"? I am not trying to create a "taste great...less filling" debate so check your emotions at the door please.