..TommyJohnson.....Sorry to point this out, but nobody said anything about lawmakers thinking. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
Last year, one of the newspapers ran an article stating that the MO. legislature had passed XX number of new laws in this past session. Gee, isn't that something to be proud of, more assinine restrictions on the few remaining liberties we retain!!!!
Missouri does have two types of hunting that can be LEGALLY done with an artificial light. One is bullfrog hunting, but only with a rimfire rifle or handgun, or pellet gun.
The second type is 'coon/other furbearers " when treed with the aid of dogs". This stipulation also includes only , I think, a rimfire of some sort.
Several years ago, my two sons and I would go spotlighting, without a gun, just to look at the deer. MO. later passed a law that you could not even do that!!
As for the farmer using a spotlight to check on his cattle, horses, etc., I know of several who have been harassed about doing this, even though they had legitimate reasons for being out there with a light.
OC, I agree with you that the wardens seem to have the notion that you are doing something wrong if you are in the woods, with a gun or bow. It is just up to them to figure out what you are doing, and ticket you for it.
The part about every hunter being a poacher who just hasn't been caught yet, is a slap in the face to those who don't poach.
But then again, I guess that I sort of feel that a lot of cops are criminals who just didn't get caught. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif