Claimed benefits of moly coated bullets include:
1)Extends barrel life
2)Increases number of (accurate) rounds between cleaning
3)Increases velocity
I have worn out two stainless & one carbon steel 30-06 target barrels, not to mention a number of half worn out Garand and M1A barrels; some with nothing but moly bullets, others w/o moly and some that started w/naked bullets and were last shot w/moly. Have also used moly in a few hunting rifles. Based on this rather limited experience, my conclusions are:
1)If moly extends barrel life (which I doubt), it was very precious few rounds. Throat erosion killed all of my barrels and heat/pressure in throat area was the primary cause and moly cannot reduce anything but friction IMHO. I did not experience any difference in the useful life of the barrel which shot only moly bullets when compared to those that shot only naked bullets or a combination, all three started throwing fliers at +/- 7000 rounds. For all practical purposes, the same(mild target)loads were used in all three barrels. Accuracy, not velocity was the goal.
2)Moly definately reduced fouling and resulted in easier cleaning and/or more rounds can be fired before accuracy begins to suffer.
3)Moly bullets reduce friction, therefore reduce velocity and pressure when compared to the same load behind a naked bullet.
I clean my rifles after each use regardless of number of rounds fired, and fortunately, my target rifles never showed a change in POI after cleaning. That has not always been the case with hunting rifle barrels, however.
Based on the above observations and my current type of shooting (predators, deer, nilgai & hog hunting), I no longer use moly. I can see the benefit to the PD shooters and maybe cross the course highpower shooters that do a lot of shooting, but it is not worth the hassle to me.
Regards,
hm