dan brothers
New member
I went to Nikon's Spot-On and compared my two loads, and the 204 is doing a tad better than the 243, unless I'm missing something. The 204 has less drop even out to 700 yds...when they both are sighted in at the same distance.
How can that be...? Surely that is incorrect...?
204 40gr vmax @3900 fps vs 243 58 gr vmax @ 3850
How can that be...? Surely that is incorrect...?
204 40gr vmax @3900 fps vs 243 58 gr vmax @ 3850