NV Recommendations

TXCOONDOG

TXCOONDOG

Well-known member
Looking for a digital night vision rifle scope to record daytime hunts (kills) and also be able to use at night too.

Any input or recommendations is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
att.6xvxlBev3S_9wG9Ks1Uzj1rkhxXdBwHVI0c3oNyrNHE.jpeg
 
I have a PARD Nightstalker 4k and the Pulsar c50. I am likely going to add that AGM to the stable.
OTOH- The DNT specs don't justify the hype on these forums.

The PARD is 6.5x magnification. It's only real negative point is the small FOV of 20' @ 100 yards.
The Pulsar would make a great scope for low light deer hunting but it is very heavy. It adds something like 2-1/2 pounds to the rifle. Like the DNT, it's not 4k either.
 
TXCOONDOG said:
Are y'all running an aftermarket illuminator, if so, which one?
Click to expand...
Similar to @hunt0168 My primary ir is a SHL 66 with the 840nm Turbo on a 6mm. Secondary is the 38 with standard 840nm used on an airgun.

It looks like Sniper Hog Lights has changed their lineup. All of mine are the older style 66, 50, 38 and a Coyote Cannon. Much prefer the push button, instant on rather than the rheostat dial. Looks like you have to buy that separate for the new models.
sniperhoglights.com

Hyperion / Coyote Cannon 1 mode push button tail cap

Hyperion / Coyote Cannon 1 mode push button tail cap fits all our Hyperion 40, 50 and 66 lights and our Coyote Cannon lights.
sniperhoglights.com sniperhoglights.com
 
@wildflights Yes, their lineup has been changed to the new Hyperion design. The main difference is in how the beam is focused. LRX you rotate the head. Hyperion you slide the head fore and aft. I believe they also are touting longer throw with smaller diameter heads. I haven't really kept up with the changes since going thermal, so that will have to be confirmed.

I prefer the rheostat cap personally, but to each their own. They also have adjustable mounts to easily aim/adjust your lights to where your scope is pointing. SHL is nice stuff and performs. The 850nm will give you a bit better clarity and throw, but I prefer the 940nm. I have seen coyotes react negatively to the 850nm illuminators. The Turbo illuminators also have a tighter beam than the regular ones and may not fill your entire view screen at certain magnification levels and distances. Just something to think about before deciding.

I'd say if interested in using their products, it is well worth a phone call and let Rob or Jason help you pick what is best for you. They are super helpful and know their products better than anyone. Really great guys to work with.
 
Another Sniper Hog Lights satisfied user. I’ve accumulated 3 of their models and put QD mounts on all. For the most part I’m using the Hyperion 30 with the 940 module. It’s MUCH lighter than the other two and lights up my bait pile at 150 yards just fine.

On a tripod the weight really doesn’t make too much difference but the smaller profile is easier to maneuver. The 30 also uses 18650 batteries. I like the rheostat switch so that I can slowly increase the lights intensity, seems to spook those light sensitive coyotes much less that blasting them full on.

The larger 66 with a white module is pretty much my go to for searching for dead coyotes light as the weight is substantial and full power brightness is overkill for what I need.

TX, if you’re going to use the rifle off a tripod and carry it for your hunts, go with something like the 30 or 40. PLENTY of light and if the critters you’re after aren’t light sensitive. You’ll appreciate the weight savings. I’d use the 850 module with a rheostat as you might not need full brightness.

Bob, I couldn't agree more with what you said, spot on.

IMG_5528sm.jpg
 
I recently bought the AGM Spectrum 4k Mini for this exact thing... To video deer hunts during the day time. It's a LOT smaller than the regular Spectrum 4k and so far I like it. Very light weight and very good image. I really like the features like the reticles and such.

Now the bad... I mounted it on my spare 6 arc and tried it at night with my SHL Hyperion 66. That light is TOO much for the scope. On both manual and auto the scope has a hard time adjusting to the correct amount of light. I am going to try my SHL 50 and see how it does. If it doesn't do any better I will be putting my RIX t20 back on that rifle and just use the AGM for it's intended purpose of day light deer hunts. Even AGM mentions that they made the mini more for day hunting.
 
DoubleLungRage said:
I recently bought the AGM Spectrum 4k Mini for this exact thing... To video deer hunts during the day time. It's a LOT smaller than the regular Spectrum 4k and so far I like it. Very light weight and very good image. I really like the features like the reticles and such.

Now the bad... I mounted it on my spare 6 arc and tried it at night with my SHL Hyperion 66. That light is TOO much for the scope. On both manual and auto the scope has a hard time adjusting to the correct amount of light. I am going to try my SHL 50 and see how it does. If it doesn't do any better I will be putting my RIX t20 back on that rifle and just use the AGM for it's intended purpose of day light deer hunts. Even AGM mentions that they made the mini more for day hunting.
Click to expand...

Do you find the 3.5 base mag too much for 10-25 yards?
 
TXCOONDOG said:
Do you find the 3.5 base mag too much for 10-25 yards?
Click to expand...

I haven't messed with the AGM at those distances, but the RIX is a 3.5 too and I have tried it in some pretty tight spots (20-45) yards and it is pretty tight. I would imagine that at 10-25 it would be too much.

To be honest... I got the AGM mini on sale for $500 and some change. Now that I have it, I wouldn't pay the normal price of almost $800. I'd just go ahead and buy the regular one.
 
A must have is an IR laser on the thermal to walk the person with night vision on to the target.

Some of the Lazer range finders have an IR beam that you can see with the digital unit.
 
Back
Top