Opinions on Fox Pro Inferno

champ198

Active member
been looking at getting a Fox Pro and have been looking at the inferno just due to the cost of it being cheaper with a varity of calls.
what are your alls opinions on it. My Brother has a Wildfire 2
how does the Inferno compare to the Wildfire. iknow the inferno has the newer remote but what is the improvement with this new remote.
and how is the Volume on the Inferno.
 
I'm looking at the same thing. I've never had a problem with my spitfire (model before wildfire). the speaker is plenty loud to call in yotes from over a mile away. I have heard the remote on the inferno is a huge improvement as well as getting 75 sounds.

I've asked for an inferno for Christmas this year to replace my spitfire.
 
For $100 more I would save/ask for the Banshee. Operating with 10AA batteries compared to 4AA's is a massive difference in output.

If you ever want to run an external speaker with an extended volume level the Banshee is the baseline model to go with and the one I recommend to my friends just starting out.
 
I have a Banshee and it is AWESOME. The Inferno remote is a HUGE improvement over the spitfire and wildfire. I have tested my Banshee out to 300 yards. Only thing I wish for is that the remote buttons illuminated.
 
I love my Inferno! It's lightweight and the remote really is nice. It has all the sounds I need to call in everything we've got in VA. Only problem is it's illegal to call coons with an e-caller in VA (but that's not Foxpro's fault).
 
Last edited:
I just bought one last week. My first electronic call. I will post back once I have had a chance to try it out in the woods!
 
I have had the spitfire, worked just fine - no problems at all. The range is limited, but you just had to set up differently to make it work.

I upgraded to the Inferno. Increased range, more calls. Very organized remote functions. It really is the most practical call that Foxpro makes, if you ask me. The rest are just for show, not needed. Just my 2 cents.....

My only question is, is the Inferno louder than the Spitfire? I never ran any tests or anything when I had the spitfire, wondering if anyone knows this???
 
Originally Posted By: FullMoonYoteSkinI upgraded to the Inferno. Increased range, more calls. Very organized remote functions. It really is the most practical call that Foxpro makes, if you ask me. The rest are just for show, not needed. Just my 2 cents.....



i totally agree with this.
 
I doubt that the people who prefer the higher grade models do so for show. Many of them want more volume, more usable features like Foxfusion and Foxcast. Finally, many of them prefer and need the TX1000 remote.
 
Originally Posted By: SlickerThanSnotOriginally Posted By: FullMoonYoteSkinI upgraded to the Inferno. Increased range, more calls. Very organized remote functions. It really is the most practical call that Foxpro makes, if you ask me. The rest are just for show, not needed. Just my 2 cents.....



i totally agree with this.

Directional sound, Foxbang, Foxfusion, Foxpitch, Foxmotion and Foxcast are definitely not "just for show"! These are field applicable options that WORK in real life.

Just for show... that made me laugh!!
 
I will comment again on this because since I last posted, I have purchased and used an inferno. Hands down better than my spitfire. Yes the speaker is identical but I've never found the spitfire to be too quiet.

The remote is on another level. The feature I find myself using the most is the stand timer. It's amazing how sometimes you think you've been sitting for 20 minutes and you look and see it's only been 8! foxbang is a cool feature but haven't really used it much yet. I can see how the foxpitch, motion, cast, etc would help as well. Maybe next call I get will have those.
 
Originally Posted By: Seebass Directional sound, Foxbang, Foxfusion, Foxpitch, Foxmotion and Foxcast are definitely not "just for show"! These are field applicable options that WORK in real life.

Just for show... that made me laugh!!



made me laugh too. but it really is true.

back in the good old days predator callers called and killed thousands of coyotes, wolves, cats, fox and other predators using a johnny stewart record player. then a cassette or other device. those callers had none of that stuff on it and called just as many animals back then, if not more, as digital do now even though the fancy digital callers has all those things on.

in fact a plain old $2.99 store bought circe or burnam brothers mouth call did a great job calling animals in.

anybody that says you need all that crap to call animals was not doing any predator calling back in those days or is not old enough to know a thing about it or ignorant of the facts.

kind of like cell phones. 40 years from now when a cell phone or some other gadget will be able wipe you butt for you, people will think you have to have one to wipe you butt. they will not realize that they can use their own hand and some paper to do the same job. might be a little exaggeration with the butt wiping cell phone.. but not much.
lol.gif


need all the bells, whiz bangs and whistles to call stupid animals. not hardly.
 
Are those FEATURES needed? Absolutely not. Are they nice to have? Absolutely. We used what we had years ago and it worked fine. Everything evolves and gets bigger, better, or smaller and better. Technology is greater. It is The WANT for the latest and greatest. Not a necessity.
 
Last edited:
Whether living in the past or present, Advantageous functions are simply that. Functions that give you an advantage in the field. These are not "for show" nor are they necessary, but for some, they are very useful.
 
Originally Posted By: SlickerThanSnotOriginally Posted By: Seebass Directional sound, Foxbang, Foxfusion, Foxpitch, Foxmotion and Foxcast are definitely not "just for show"! These are field applicable options that WORK in real life.

Just for show... that made me laugh!!



made me laugh too. but it really is true.

back in the good old days predator callers called and killed thousands of coyotes, wolves, cats, fox and other predators using a johnny stewart record player. then a cassette or other device. those callers had none of that stuff on it and called just as many animals back then, if not more, as digital do now even though the fancy digital callers has all those things on.

in fact a plain old $2.99 store bought circe or burnam brothers mouth call did a great job calling animals in.

anybody that says you need all that crap to call animals was not doing any predator calling back in those days or is not old enough to know a thing about it or ignorant of the facts.

kind of like cell phones. 40 years from now when a cell phone or some other gadget will be able wipe you butt for you, people will think you have to have one to wipe you butt. they will not realize that they can use their own hand and some paper to do the same job. might be a little exaggeration with the butt wiping cell phone.. but not much.
lol.gif


need all the bells, whiz bangs and whistles to call stupid animals. not hardly.

Haha! I hear you all. I agree with Slickthansnot 100% though. We've probably all heard the "Indian's killed deer with sharp sticks" montra, when we tried telling our buddy that one gun was junk compared to another or asked the difference between a Matthews bow and a bowtech. And whoever says that, is right. Comparing Fords, Chevy's, Dodges of all models and types - within reason, would lead you to the same understanding. Luxury items are a need and not a want. A new hunter could pick up a cheap mossback open reed call, a savage axis, and a white painters blanket and go out there and beat you in a coyote tourney - all the while shooting cheap american eagles and driving a 93 ford ranger that he picked up for $650 bucks.

I believe a lot comes down to luck and having that coyote be where we want him to be, and when we want him to be there (I wish).

We are in the day and age of very efficient outreach branding and marketing to the Nth degree and it is starting to brain wash people into believing that one thing is better than the other because it has more bells and whistles and has capabilities (higher price tag for the manufacturer and vendor) to do things that haven't been done before.....However, all of these calls are able to call coyotes. They can all do it and probably can all do it at about the same rate if you do your part in preparation and strategy. You don't need any Foxfusion, Fox-this, or fox-that in order to shoot more dogs than some other guy. Last year in the largest coyote tournament in MN, some highschoolers on their first EVER year of coyote hunting, while all of them were still in basketball and wrestling - scored 2nd place losing only to some repeat winners who have no wives and jobs that they could come in drousy as F to, hence, their whole lives ARE coyote hunting - and they have more time than anyone I know to get out there and get their research done.

Dogs are smart sometimes, but sometimes we out-smart ourselves...


 
Last edited:
I agree with tod Bartell. I own a hellfire and a wildfire. Use the wildfire 90% of the time. Used wildfire on a brutally windy day in ND one time thinking that day was going to be a waste but had to go cuz it was a trip we made. Called some dogs from a long ways out in terrible calling conditions. Never in my wildest dreams would I have thought some of the dogs could have heard the call from as far away as they did with that little speaker. After that day I realized all the other stuff advertised is fluff. Always thought the wildfire with a longer remote would be the perfect little call. Looks like the Inferno is just that and I will be getting one down the road.
 
Last edited:


Write your reply...
Back
Top