Quote:
Quote:
Pre-ban lowers were determined by a serial number range.
There was and maybe still is a place on Ar-15 .com - I haven't looked for several years - that had the serial number ranges from the various lower receiver makers as to what constituted a pre-ban lower.
According to AR-15.com, that was never the case.
Many people also believe that a serial number can tell you whether or not a receiver is pre- or post-ban. This is not always the case. For example, if a manufacturer's books show a serial number as being manufactured on August 23, 1994, and also lists that serial number being shipped on September 3, 1994, is this a pre-ban receiver? Well, that information alone will not tell you. If the books only show when a serial number was made and left, we still don't know how it was shipped. Was it a rifle? or a receiver only? did the dealer who purchased it build it into a SAW before The Date? These are all questions that are unanswerable with the provided information, so don't go on these facts alone!
Yellowhammer:
What you included above about uncertainty is exactly why I made the comment I made in my earlier post and include again just below:
"The Ban itself stated you could not build a new pre-ban complete rifle using a pre-ban lower after a certain date (I forget now what it was) that had never been assembled into a rifle before that date."
During the ban (1994-2004), to be totally sure you had a properly configured rifle, you had to know when the lower in itself became a rifle and not just a lower. If you bought a lower after a certain date that had never been made into a rifle, you could not then build a "pre-ban" configuration rifle with a flash hider and a bayonet lug upper.
In essence, the Ban, as it was interpretated, attempted to make it impossible to build any totally new complete "pre-ban" rifles even though the lower in itself was by serial number definition a "pre-ban" lower.
Like I stated, that's why I added that paragraph.
There still, however, was a list of what was a pre-ban receiver - defined by serial numbers - that existed at one time on AR-15.com. The early AR-15.com sight was purely an informational sight and a far cry from the current site, and the first interpretations of what constituted pre and post ban from even the BATF was based on serial numbers. That interpretation quickly changed during the early life of the Ban. Thus the sentence I added.
Maybe a simple way to look at your question as you asked it:
1. A serial number determined what was pre-ban and post-ban lower recieivers. However, a serial number DOES NOT necessarily determine a legal pre-ban or post-ban RIFLE.
2. During the ban (1994-2004), the date an existing pre-ban stripped lower was first assembled as part of a complete rifle determined whether it could be later assembled as a legal or illegal pre-ban configuration rifle during the Ban. Ie., changing out the upper receivers only during the Ban.
For example, if I had legally bought a stripped lower receiver in 1992 (pre-ban by serial number)and put it in a drawer, in 1996 I could not assemble it into a complete pre-ban rifle with the pre-ban bayonet lug and flash hider on the upper receiver. I could however use the pre-ban lower to build a post-ban configuration rifle (no bayo lug and flash hider on the upper receiver).
Since the Ban has sunset, you can go to the gun show tomorrow and buy all the components - including a lower receiver - and build it into an AR-15 (with no other restrictions) as long as it has a 16" barrel to meet the legal definition of a rifle and contains all semi-auto parts.
It can be built in either "pre-ban" or "post ban" configurations. Since the Ban sunset, they are just terms once used....which still define what the rifle looks like.
All in all, that's all the Ban really did. It was a pure cosmetic thing....for politicians.....and in reality. It's now gone.
-BCB
Edited for additional clarification....hopefully. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif