The article noted lists some typical internet myths re the 788, for example:
IMHO the best one are the .222's, because of the lower case pressure and smaller case head makes for less bolt thrust. A .222Rem 788 (well cared for) can be shot for a lifetime. The .243Win and .308Win versions can be problematic if consistantly loaded hot. The .223Rem's are okay but (IMHO) should not be used constantly with the hot 5.56mm NATO ammo. While a Remington 700 doesn't care, the hotter military loads in 5.56mm stress the action more.
The writer appears ignorant that use of 5.56 ammo in a .223 Remington is often an overload as the military cases are thicker, and create pressure problems.
So, how much does that poster really know from his own/others experience AND sound ballistic science?
Another: Bolt compression leads to case stretch and eventually excessive headspace, especially on the .473" head. Again, just a repeated myth as this "excessive headspace" was never a problem per Remington recalls (nor on MY .473 Rem.788 bolt heads).
Other falsehoods: High ejection angle interferes with scope knobs; The magazine tends to rattle, a problem for hunters. My cases eject fine with scopes, and my magazines don't rattle!
Not much meat on the barrel,actually, 788 barrels are typically almost a medium heavy sporter, and have plenty to set a barrel back when chamber is shot out... .
I have seen this post before...it is pretty much discredited, so I am glad to discredit it again!!!