Self-defense shooting of grizzly bear draws charges

Crimson Raptor

New member
Nice to read about the community and local government in support of the shooter. He followed the rules and reported the shooting only to be charged with a federal misdemeanor. As mentioned in the article, this type of aggressive enforcement will deter law-abiding folks from making that phone call.

http://www.cdapress.com/news/local_news/article_65972651-9003-5b14-b4e6-730e29ff6b8a.html

COEUR d'ALENE - A man charged with unlawfully shooting and killing a grizzly bear had so many supporters at his arraignment Tuesday in federal court that the judge had to move the hearing to a larger courtroom.

Even there, every seat was taken as his family, friends and neighbors, young and old, squeezed in.

Jeremy M. Hill, 33, pleaded not guilty in U.S. District Court to killing the animal with a rifle on his 20-acre property near Porthill, Idaho, at the Canadian border. He lives five miles from the closest grizzly bear recovery zone.

The grizzly bear is classified as a threatened species in the lower 48 states, according to the Endangered Species Act, and protected by federal law. Hill's charge is a misdemeanor.

Magistrate Judge Candy Dale set trial, at least for now, for Oct. 4.

Hill has declined comment. His lawyer, Marc Lyons of Coeur d'Alene, said he plans to defend Hill on the basis of self-defense and protection of family.

Following the hearing, his father, Mike Hill, of Athol, said, "This whole thing is a waste of taxpayer money."

He said his son was concerned for the safety of his children playing outside when a mother grizzly and two cubs wandered onto his property on May 8.

Jeremy Hill has six kids, ranging in age from 14 years old to 10 months old. At least five were home when the grizzly was killed, Mike Hill said.

The bears had gone after some pigs in a pen that the kids had been raising, Mike Hill said.

He said his son shot one of the bears, then called authorities to notify them of the kill. The other two bears ran off.

He said his son could have just buried the animal and not said anything to law enforcement. He said his son is being penalized for coming forward.

State Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, attended the hearing in full support of Jeremy Hill.

"The charges are simply unjust," she said following the hearing. "Hopefully common sense will prevail. It's clearly an issue of protecting the family."

She predicted that punishing someone who reported killing a grizzly will damage government efforts to protect the animals.

She said nearly $20,000 was raised by community members for Hill's defense.

Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, was asked about the case while appearing in Sandpoint on Tuesday.

While Labrador said he needed to be careful in dealing with the prosecutorial side of things, he did have this to say:

"Clearly, we have a problem with the ESA when situations like this happen." He later added, "We're doing everything we can to make sure this man is treated fairly."

The Boundary County commissioners on Monday said they are standing beside Hill on the charge, saying in a statement that Hill had "not only the right, but the obligation to protect his children and his family."

The commissioners said they'll be seeking help from Idaho Gov. Butch Otter and Idaho's congressional delegation to get the charge dismissed.

The charge of killing a threatened species is punishable by up to a year in prison, a maximum fine of $50,000, and up to one year of supervised release.
 
This happened not far from here. I feel he did the right thing. To bad doing right gets a bunch of nitwit feds gettin after him. Hope all works out.
 
What is frustrating about the enforcement of the Endangered Species Act in this case is that grizzly bears are not endangered in North America - only in the lower 48 states. They are thriving in Canada and Alaska and even Yellowstone.

But since the tree huggers are bound and determined to re-establish every large predator mammal throughout the U.S., we will continue to see this aggressive enforcement. The preservation of livestock and children comes second to re-establishing predator populations. at least in this case.
 
What a bunch of B.S. I would hope it gets droped, I would have done the same thing but would have gone with the 3 S's
 
Considering the U S Attorney General's, Eric Holder's, disdain for firearms, I have to wonder if the bear had been killed with an Axe, or an arrow,,,would the local federal prosecutor still been inclined to file the charge...??

This sounds like another one of those cases where a call was made to Washington DC to see if they should push it...
 
The trouble here is that,from what I read,his kids pigs were in danger and not the kids.Could be kind of hard to make a case,depending on the situation.We have black bears coming into towns around here all the time.They do some damage and threaten someones pigs or horses at times.Mostly it's just garbage or blue berries that they get into.The Game Commission here says that unless you farm for a living,you must put up with it.We live in bear country,and have to understand that contact will occur from time to time.There have been bears shot that I know of,and the GC doesn't.Or if they do,they choose to let it slide.I know of a couple blue berry bush owners who call if they get a bear doing damage.One didn't get the response he wanted,and gut shot the bear so it would run off and die and leave no evidence behind.Cruel,but effective.
 
jbmaster,,,, just so ya know, as usual, there's more to the story than is told by the media.Truth is, the majority of the problem Grizzly bears up here are NOT residents, but bears that were relocated by F@G from places like Yellowstone where they'd caused problems for the tourists in their Volvos.
The USF&W seems to think that area of Idaho's a frikin dumping ground for problem Bears.

Can't find the article right now, but the good people of Bonners Ferry auctioned off a 4H pig donated by a young lady for the family's defence expenses. Well, several people bought the pig and then "re-donated" it to be auctioned again.
When all was said and done, they raised close to sixteen grand for their defence fund, and the pig was returned to the young lady.

I'll try and find the article.

Found it.
Turns out it was closer to twenty grand.
http://www.newsbf.com/news/1108/20regina.html

 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Duane@ssuThis happened not far from here.


Didn't realize you were that close to the Canadian border.
 
Originally Posted By: jbmasterI know of a couple blue berry bush owners who call if they get a bear doing damage.One didn't get the response he wanted,and gut shot the bear so it would run off and die and leave no evidence behind.Cruel,but effective.


Therein lies the problem... Game and fish didn't sell a license to shoot the bear, the individual didn't attempt to take and recover the bear to eat or display as a trophy, it was instead wasted, and the taxidermist didn't get a shot at mounting that bear.

If licenses were sold, it would generate revenue to help fund the game and fish department operations. It could be used to fund bear habitat, or further bear studies. There would people actively pursuing those animals, thus they would be buying guns, and ammunition, and gas, and clothes to hunt in, a few groceries for their day afield, maybe spending the weekend in the local campground or motel, eating at the local restaurants, getting tires and other problems fixed at the local garage, etc. etc. And, a great many of them would be carting hides to the local taxidermists. And, aside from the economic impact on the local community, many of those hunters would be eating the animal, rather than wasting it. The animals would still be learning to fear man, and thus they would be staying the he|| out of the blueberrie fields and garbage cans. Rather than the people being brainwashed to think that they should peacefully coexist with a nuisance animal that is destroying their property.

But the Game and Fish Departments are too ignorant to realize that, and they continue to wander around in their little vacuum thinking that bears aren't being killed simply because they say you shouldn't do that!

What happens when a bear shows up in the metropolitan areas? Game and Fish comes and captures them and carts them off. Why??? Because they pose a threat to life in the city. As a rural resident or a small town resident however, you're supposed to tolerate them, because you are in bear country. HELLO... Pittsburg was not created in the initial 7 days, it took a long time for it to get here, and IT USED TO BE BEAR COUNTRY TOO!!!

So why don't they relocate a few to down town Pittsburg? Because, the people will not stand for it! And, the people vote!! And, there's more of them in the city than there is in the small towns and urban areas. And, politicians dictate Game and Fish funding.
 
Ummmm,we have a bear season,a license for bear, and taxidermists who mount them.I miss your point.The bears do fear man.We aren't being threatened ourselves.Just our garbage and crops mostly.Understand that a bear is a very smart critter.If they want something,they usually find a way to get it.Most raids are in the middle of the night.And,lots of people actually enjoy seeing a bear prowling around.Gives them some good gossip to pass on. One more thing.It is great that the community stood beside the family.I'll bet the people in some city wouldn't raise that much,if they cared at all.
 
Originally Posted By: jbmaster And,lots of people actually enjoy seeing a bear prowling around.Gives them some good gossip to pass on.

No doubt,,, but keep in mind, a Black Bear looking for an easy meal is a far cry from the Rogue Grizzly's that the Gubment see's fit to dump out up here.
Should have never gotten to this point to start with.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top