Thermal lrf

Decoyed

Member
I got a pulsar with lrf. I tried the Lrf out in the fog last night and was sad to say worthless junk in fog. I grabbed my lieca and had no issues ranging. The pulsar would only read 10yds in fog. Now I get it’s not perfect but Omg fail at the price point. If anybody has a thermal lrf that works good in weather please reply. I wish companies didn’t make something so cheap. Most lrf on thermals are 700-800 dollars added to the price of a thermal and perform like $200 unit. If you know anything about lrf most are junk and only a few are good and accurate. The sight box on pulsar lrf is box you can fit a car in. they should use a dot to pinpoint what a person is looking at. narrow the beam of the laser and put some power to it. 600-1200 range finders are weak use a 3000yd finder and you have power to cut most weather. Overall the unit is ok but there is so much room for improvement
 
One morning in January (several years ago) I was testing a halo-xrf, as N-Vision had sent me one to test due to 27 reports of similar behavior to OP in previous 30 days (zero for the 2 years before).

Conditions this morning were 7F and "frozen mist". I'd never seen frozen mist before, but it was white and hanging in the air, just like regular mist, except bright white, not "grey". So as "other control" devices I also had a lieca 3500 handheld LRF and an olde chinese bushy arc 1600 elite handheld LRF. From the position I choose, which was top of a 1300 foot hill with elevations ranging from 1500 to the West, 1300 to the East and 1200 to the N and 1400 to the S ... I tried to range vegetation with the XRF first, and no matter which way I pointed it, I got 11-13 yds. Even if I pointed it straight up in the air ! In these types of conditions in rural area I range a lot on evergreens (it was January with snow on the ground) as for whatever reason they are more likely to give a return.
With the XRF, again, I got 11-13 yds, no matter what.
With the Lieca on evergreens I could get up to 347yds, but no farther.
With the bushy on evergreens I could get up to 709yds, but no farther.

So on this day, it was definitely "bottom rail on top" with the 6 year old $350 to my door chinese Bushy beating out the $1k portuguese lieca and the $9k xrf (with chinese 600-1100 XRF).
The further testing on different days (and even later the same day when the frozen mist burned off) revealed zero issues with any of the range finders, and subsequently the lieca was top dog, then the xrf, then the bushy. But in frozen mist, in that spot, on that day, the results were as indicated.

In general, range finders don't like too much "water in the air" and performance will degrade under daylight conditions (more reflective objects in the LOS) and when "water is in the air".

But that wasn't the full story in this case. The rest of this story was that 30 days prior, the hardware manufacturer had (unbeknownst to N-Vision) sent them a "new improved" batch of LRFs. These LRFs put out a stronger, more focused signal. The sensor that receives these signals on the LRF was thus getting more returns off objects, that it previously would have - like frozen mist particles in t he air ! By adjusting downward, ever so slightly, the sensitivity of the LRF sensor, the problem could be adjusted and eliminated and it was. That said, mother nature can always concoct conditions that will foil the best range finder. I've still never seen frozen mist at any other time than that morning and never had another issue with the XRF ranging.

All that said, for years (since 2014) I've been using WMLRFs (Weapons Mounted LRFs). That way, I can move them around separately from the thermals and get the results I want where, when I want them. Also, integrated solutions invariably come up short vs "best of breed" solutions. This is just a general truth on this planet.

==
This was a setup I used back around 2016 for testing a belgian (IRnD) vampire solo range finder.

44403085801_1ee6f28045_k.jpg


It was a 905nm critter, but fired a large (1000 ish per second) burst of ranging pulses and averaged the results. Euro Optic was selling them for a while. Jason wanted me to try it instead of the Raptar S/ES I was asking for and said he would back me up if there were any issues. The range finder was actually GREAT and their product support guy (back in Belgium) got on line with me on whatsapp to answer questions (we had to dive down into the factory settings to make a few changes). But after about 2 months I broke the power button and had to send it back. After six months, Belgium said it was long fixed, but they were unable to figure out how to reexport it. So, Jason wound up getting me an S/ES instead.

The 14 on the rear was for adjusting the co-witnessing laser to the day scope reticle, The UTCx thermal clipon was removed when doing that. But when I carried the gear outside, I had it all mounted on the gun. If you were wondering how a setup in that pic could possibly work :D

I also have owned 7 radii over the eons

44437620921_0c37eff2ee_k.jpg



And a pile of various flavors of RAPTAR.

Here's a RAPTAR S/ES on an IR-Patrol as a thermal range finder

47413738672_7cfff79914_k.jpg


I found that setup highly useful !!! It might look unwieldly in the pic inside the house, but outside in the dark, it was very useful. :D

Radii also worked on the patrol

46556253095_8c216cc66f_k.jpg


==

So, if you are wondering how to co-witness an LRF to a thermal scope (or monocular). Here's how I do it. I use 2 guns, 2 tripods, one is the thermal setup, the other is the NV setup. I aim the already zeroed thermal at an appropriate man made object at a decent distance like 500-ish yards. If I am matched up at that distance, then at double that distance I'm be back to the same offset I can measure on the gun between the reticle and the laser aperture. Of course there is some error in the process. But I can say that I've been doing this for years and it works well for me.
After aiming the tripod mounted thermal reticle at the object, I turn on the range finder laser (the co-witnessing laser) . I then switch to the NV gun and find that laser. Then go back and forth between the thermal gun and the NV gun adjusting the laser on the thermal gun to be aimed at the center of the object that the thermal reticle is aimed at.
AND I keep checking the thermal reticle to make sure it isn't moving. If it moves, I put it back on target and continue.

Once I think they match, I test a number of known distance objects, power poles, corner posts, tree branches (both verticle and horizontal targets) to try to detect issues. If issue detected, repeat the matching process to match the laser to the reticle.

Carrying the gear out and back takes longer than the matching/testing process. I've done this less than 100 times, but more than 50 times, it gets easier and faster with repetition.

But this means, I'm using "industry standard" weapons mountable LRFs with my thermals instead of "un named chinese LRFs". And these "best of breed" range finders definitely work better. With the radius, at night I can range a grassy hillside at 3km. With a RAPTAR, same at 5km. Farther than I shoot !
In the day, radius to 1 km solid on grassy hill side (max 1500 on metal building). RAPTAR 3km day max 5km on metal building day.

==
And if anyone is in the market for a WMLRF, we have the new Vortex i4000 on sale for $1550 at check out using THIS LINK . And these have ballistics built in to the LRF as well, so in addition to the range, the unit shows your elevation hold (and wind hold if setup for that).
 
Last edited:
So are you basically saying you can throw any old lrf on a thermal scope get them lined up to where they point at the same point of aim and good to go?
 
So are you basically saying you can throw any old lrf on a thermal scope get them lined up to where they point at the same point of aim and good to go?
He’s using WMLRF’s. Weapon mounted. Not many out there that are affordable. There is the Radius which is discontinued and then the Vortex which is new and on sale for $1550. The Vortex has issues in the cold. And not even what I consider cold. @25* it’s having issues. Who knows when it gets cold if it will even work.
 
Yes, we've gotten 2 complaints about issues in the cold.

2 customers have complained it was a little slower ranging in the cold, one of those said "but not slow enough to matter".

==

Here's a report from customer (cleared for public release)from recent hunting trip to ID. Where it was colder than it is further South.

==
"

53377752165_59583fa682_k.jpg


I got mine from SOK and spent some time poking around the mountains of central Idaho.

53377305471_a2a6efa634_k.jpg


It worked incredibly well for coyotes. They move pretty fast across huge fields so in the past (with a handheld range finder) I’d get a range and then have to guess how much it had changed by the time I was back on the gun. Now it’s just Point. Click. Bang!

I also used it on wolves with success 🙂
Most big game is off limits to such technology in Idaho so I stretched its legs on trees, rocks, etc. and made good hits out past 1000 yards with the 6 ARC.

I was concerned about the screen brightness from some reports here, but after I learned it can be turned down it’s been a non issue. I’ll still probably try some sort of tinted lense eventually just because.

I’ve owned a couple RAPTARs and I definitely prefer this over them for ease of use, price, and mounting system. Mine were also non-ballistic models so this is obviously head and shoulders better for my needs.

When my budget recovers from some recent decisions I’ll definitely want another. They move quickly and easily from gun to gun but I’d rather not have to mess with it.
 
Yes, we've gotten 2 complaints about issues in the cold.

2 customers have complained it was a little slower ranging in the cold, one of those said "but not slow enough to matter".

==

Here's a report from customer (cleared for public release)from recent hunting trip to ID. Where it was colder than it is further South.

==
"

53377752165_59583fa682_k.jpg




53377305471_a2a6efa634_k.jpg
I quick scanned your post and don’t see anything really about the temp. There’s a post on SH right now about trying to use it @25*. It will range and then not show the solution. He has to range multiple times.

If it actually gets cold out it will be interesting to see if it will work at all.
 
So is this setup comparable to thermal lrf scopes and is it even attachable to most thermal scopes. Price is great compared to a whole new setup if it works well.
 
... I quick scanned your post and don’t see anything really about the temp ...

The post is about a hunting trip in ID, we can see images of the VO and the snow in the mountains.

==
... There’s a post on SH ...
yes NHpiper's post has some new symptoms that are concerning. Scott_at_vortex has been responsive.

VO is also working on a Mil version ...

53382714500_cbf1638ce7_z.jpg


Hope we're doing a good job helping them beta-test the common components !!
 
... So is this setup comparable to thermal lrf scopes and is it even attachable to most thermal scopes. Price is great compared to a whole new setup if it works well ...


Yes, WMLRF are comparable in function to integrated LRFs. In one of my posts above you can see various attachment methods I've used for WMLRF. On a stoner, mounted on side forearm rail works fine, either side. Some thermals, like some reaps and patrols have mount points directly on them, as shown.
 
I got a pulsar with lrf. I tried the Lrf out in the fog last night and was sad to say worthless junk in fog. I grabbed my lieca and had no issues ranging. The pulsar would only read 10yds in fog. Now I get it’s not perfect but Omg fail at the price point. If anybody has a thermal lrf that works good in weather please reply. I wish companies didn’t make something so cheap. Most lrf on thermals are 700-800 dollars added to the price of a thermal and perform like $200 unit. If you know anything about lrf most are junk and only a few are good and accurate. The sight box on pulsar lrf is box you can fit a car in. they should use a dot to pinpoint what a person is looking at. narrow the beam of the laser and put some power to it. 600-1200 range finders are weak use a 3000yd finder and you have power to cut most weather. Overall the unit is ok but there is so much room for improvement
Forgive me if I did not see it, but which unit are you talking about? The reason I ask is that I have the Pulsar Trail 2 XQ50 and have not had any issues, but then never had to range in heavy fog either. I suspect that your Leica has a much better beam divergence and thus providing better results. Also, is it possible that your Pulsar had condensation on the laser lenses? This could really screw things up.

I am sure a lot of you have experienced where you had just taken out your Thermal scope from let's say a warm vehicle or backpack and while viewing, noticed fuzziness near the edges? Maybe the unit was condensing the fog in a similar fashion?
 
I got axion2 xg35 lrf. No condensation on lens. I’m just disappointed in the poor performance imo. I tried it the other night no fog works fine. Imo it is poor quality product. Maybe that’s why there discontinued
 
I got axion2 xg35 lrf. No condensation on lens. I’m just disappointed in the poor performance imo. I tried it the other night no fog works fine. Imo it is poor quality product. Maybe that’s why there discontinued
Oh, it's a hand held. Maybe heat or sweat from your hand? I don't know.

What is weird is that unit is still available on Amazon. But when I saw the price I could understand your frustration. Sorry for your troubles.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top