When does human life begin?

azmastablasta

New member
From The Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person
The Westchester Institute and its scholars have become a distinguished resource and point of reference for think-tanks, centers for applied research, and institutes of public policy analysis. Together, we seek to make a significant contribution to the common good and to contemporary culture.

White Paper. When Does Human Life Begin?

Resolving the question of when human life begins is critical for advancing a reasoned public policy debate over abortion and human embryo research. This article considers the current scientific evidence in human embryology and addresses two central questions concerning the beginning of life: 1) in the course of sperm-egg interaction, when is a new cell formed that is distinct from either sperm or egg? and 2) is this new cell a new human organism—i.e., a new human being? Based on universally accepted scientific criteria, a new cell, the human zygote, comes into existence at the moment of sperm-egg fusion, an event that occurs in less than a second. Upon formation, the zygote immediately initiates a complex sequence of events that establish the molecular conditions required for continued embryonic development. The behavior of the zygote is radically unlike that of either sperm or egg separately and is characteristic of a human organism. Thus, the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that a zygote is a human organism and that the life of a new human being commences at a scientifically well defined “moment of conception.” This conclusion is objective, consistent with the factual evidence, and independent of any specific ethical, moral, political, or religious view of human life or of human embryos.



download acrobat readerDownload the full White Paper (526k pdf)

Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader - Download Now

http://www.westchesterinstitute.net/inde...&Itemid=113
 
How many millions of $$$ did they spend on this study? How does this benefit man kind? Could the $$$ have been better spent on other research to help the needy, sick or even used to help cleanup the environment.

What is sounds like to me they trying to do here... clear the way for embryo research/use for other medical needs/research?

My opinion is that life does not truly start until the fetus can survive without the mother.
 
Quote:
My opinion is that life does not truly start until the fetus can survive without the mother.



So if I understand what your saying, fetal heartbeats, fetal brain activity, and fetal movements inside the womb are just special effects and stage props until the baby is actually born?

What about those little one's who have had complications, and are born pre-mature at like 24 weeks, and require the use of an entire prenatal emergency ward to stay alive with machines and pumps, and intravenus feedings and the like?

Are the also "not really alive"? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif

My opinion is that anyone who would take the life of a child, AT ANY AGE, born or in the womb is a cold hearted monster whom I have absolutely ZERO respect for.

Children are our greatest gifts and should be cherished above all else!
 
It amazes me that a person can be prosecuted for two counts of murder if that person kills a pregnant woman but a DR. can kill an unborn baby and it's OK. This is carried to the extreme wiht partial birth abortions.
 
My opinion is that life does not truly start until the fetus can survive without the mother.

So what until then? It's just a 'mild form of cancer'.
 
I think that since no one really knows for sure when life begins that it it best to err on the side of caution and assume it begins at conception when a unique individual is created.
 
I'm sure everyone knows about all the probes and high tech gadgetry we currently have running around on the planet Mars, looking for signs of life. I wonder, if one of these machines were to peer its mechanical eye down into a Martian crevice and observe a sperm, not a fertilized egg, just a sperm, squiggling about, would not NASA, and the scientific community in general, call a massive press release, to announce to the world, "LIFE FOUND ON MARS"? Yet here, right here in our own country, our little ones have such a high bar to attain, before we will give them "human" status, and therefore acknowledge their existence. May God have mercy on us.
 
Quote:
How many millions of $$$ did they spend on this study? How does this benefit man kind? Could the $$$ have been better spent on other research to help the needy, sick or even used to help cleanup the environment.



Are you serious???!!! I mean really...Is this how libs think? What have we become?! Illustrating the fact that abortion is, indeed, murder has implications for saving MILLIONS of lives. Helping the needy? I can't think of anything more needy than an unborn baby! Benefitting mankind? How much more benfit can you give than saving life? Clean up the environment? What's the first environement that YOU experienced? Answer: YOUR MOTHER'S WOMB. Man oh man. I just don't know about folks any more. How far we have fallen.

Quote:
My opinion is that life does not truly start until the fetus can survive without the mother.



What age is that? 5 or 6 years old...9, 10? Some would contend 18.

Good grief.
 
Quote:
It amazes me that a person can be prosecuted for two counts of murder if that person kills a pregnant woman but a DR. can kill an unborn baby and it's OK. This is carried to the extreme wiht partial birth abortions.

+1
 
All you guy's are taking this to the extreme... I did not say that a fetus is not important and that partial birth abortions are ok... I am just saying that I do not believe life is fully place until further along in a pregnancy... not from right at the time of consception... and I did not say that life starts at the time of birth.

All cells in the body are very similar in structure but have been designed for different functions by changing a little this way and that. All cells have some type of activity that does not mean that they have the capability of sustaining life including brain function. Otherwise, I must be some sort of freak because I do not have memories from within the womb.

I am trying to say that the $$$ spent on this crap could have better spent researching cancer, feeding the hungry, developing cleaner fuel sources, developing new vaccines, cleaning the oceans, etc. Did we really need at multi-million dollar study for something we already feel as something that sacred.

I should have been clearer in my first post... eventhough anything I would say would not get you guys past the abortion issues... you guys need to see the forest for the trees here. What I was getting at is that they are looking at trying to pave the way to justify/say it is ok to harvesting stemcells or something from a fetus??? This is really a ethical question they are trying to bring to the forefront... and I did not say that this would be OK. I was just trying to provoke some thought.
 
Quote:
All you guy's are taking this to the extreme... I did not say that a fetus is not important and that partial birth abortions are ok... I am just saying that I do not believe life is fully place until further along in a pregnancy... not from right at the time of consception... and I did not say that life starts at the time of birth.

All cells in the body are very similar in structure but have been designed for different functions by changing a little this way and that. All cells have some type of activity that does not mean that they have the capability of sustaining life including brain function. Otherwise, I must be some sort of freak because I do not have memories from within the womb.

I am trying to say that the $$$ spent on this crap could have better spent researching cancer, feeding the hungry, developing cleaner fuel sources, developing new vaccines, cleaning the oceans, etc. Did we really need at multi-million dollar study for something we already feel as something that sacred.

I should have been clearer in my first post... eventhough anything I would say would not get you guys past to see the forest for the trees here. What I was getting at is that they are looking at trying to pave the way to justify/say it is ok to harvesting stemcells or something from a fetus??? This is really a ethical question they are trying to bring to the forefront... and I did not say that this would be OK. I was just trying to provoke some thought.



All opinions are welcome and divergent ones make for interesting threads.

Thanks for posting, sullivt! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif
 
I believe life begins at conception. Anything short of that belief is to place oneself on the slippery slope of situational morals.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top