GrouseSetter
New member
Well, I said that I would give a report when I had a chance to shoot the new 17 Remington Fireball, so here it is.
I bought a Remington SPS Varmint, 17 Remington Fireball, on Tuesday. This morning I had the chance to get it all cleaned up, then I got the Leupold bases, rings, and scope mounted. I put a Nikon Buckmaster 4.5-14x40, Mil-Dot, with the side focus, on it. I then attempted to mount my Harris bi-pod, but found that it could not be mounted with the two existing sling studs in place. I removed the stud, nearest the trigger guard and then mounted the bi-pod.
I must say that the stock is junk. It is ugly, it doesn’t have a good feel, and it does not free float the barrel. I will soon be ordering my first HS Precision stock to replace it. If anyone has a suggestion for a good bench/p-dog stock, let me know.
Then I stepped outside and found that it was beautiful, so I decided to head to the range.
The range has a fairly sturdy bench and I just shot off the bi-pod and rear bag, because I only intended to begin the break-in process and get it on paper. The range was a muddy mess because it was 43 degrees and sunny, with a steady 5 mph cross-wind. The rifle has a mild report and low recoil. However, I was not able to see the bullet impact. I think this has more to do with the bi-pod, than the recoil.
Below are some photos. I shot two four shot strings for group size. The first group was about like the one in the photo, however there was one about ¾” outside the group, which was the cold-bore shot. Before this second group, I took a cold-bore shot at a separate target. As SteveM has noted, the cold-bore shot is consistently outside of the group.
I fired exactly 35 cartridges. I fired two shots, then cleaned, for four cycles. Then three shots, then cleaned, for two cycles. Then four shots, then cleaned, for four cycles. Then five shots, once.
I must say that I think I’m going to like this cute little cartridge. I have not owned a 17 Mach IV. Everybody at the range wanted to take a look at it. Several of them had read about it in a magazine or on-line.
I didn't shoot it off this bench, I just used it for photos.
This explains itself.
For comparison, 17 Remington Fireball, 204 Ruger, 223 Remington, 308 Winchester
GrouseSetter
I bought a Remington SPS Varmint, 17 Remington Fireball, on Tuesday. This morning I had the chance to get it all cleaned up, then I got the Leupold bases, rings, and scope mounted. I put a Nikon Buckmaster 4.5-14x40, Mil-Dot, with the side focus, on it. I then attempted to mount my Harris bi-pod, but found that it could not be mounted with the two existing sling studs in place. I removed the stud, nearest the trigger guard and then mounted the bi-pod.
I must say that the stock is junk. It is ugly, it doesn’t have a good feel, and it does not free float the barrel. I will soon be ordering my first HS Precision stock to replace it. If anyone has a suggestion for a good bench/p-dog stock, let me know.
Then I stepped outside and found that it was beautiful, so I decided to head to the range.
The range has a fairly sturdy bench and I just shot off the bi-pod and rear bag, because I only intended to begin the break-in process and get it on paper. The range was a muddy mess because it was 43 degrees and sunny, with a steady 5 mph cross-wind. The rifle has a mild report and low recoil. However, I was not able to see the bullet impact. I think this has more to do with the bi-pod, than the recoil.
Below are some photos. I shot two four shot strings for group size. The first group was about like the one in the photo, however there was one about ¾” outside the group, which was the cold-bore shot. Before this second group, I took a cold-bore shot at a separate target. As SteveM has noted, the cold-bore shot is consistently outside of the group.
I fired exactly 35 cartridges. I fired two shots, then cleaned, for four cycles. Then three shots, then cleaned, for two cycles. Then four shots, then cleaned, for four cycles. Then five shots, once.
I must say that I think I’m going to like this cute little cartridge. I have not owned a 17 Mach IV. Everybody at the range wanted to take a look at it. Several of them had read about it in a magazine or on-line.
I didn't shoot it off this bench, I just used it for photos.
This explains itself.
For comparison, 17 Remington Fireball, 204 Ruger, 223 Remington, 308 Winchester
GrouseSetter