I've heard a lot of talk about the v-max's not being fur friendly, splashing along with other stories. I've shot lots, and I mean lots ot coyotes with the 60 v-max's. Most were DRT with minimal fur damage. I've also killed a couple dozen bobcats with the 60's with excellent results.
On the other hand I have a friend that has had horrible results with the lighter v-max's.
It's my theory that the slightly longer, heavier, slower 60's have found the sweet spot for delivering what I desire.
I tried the 69 MK's for a while and liked them as well but felt the v-max's delivered more hydrostatic shock. The 69's also often made large exits. For the record though, they performed much like any other hunting bullet I've shot. They have a soft core and a thin jacket, just like most hunting bullets in 223.
I'm a fan of heavy for caliber bullets but only to a point. I believe you can go to heavy just as you can go to light. This opinion is concerning hunting bullets where terminal performance is every much as important as accuracy. Punching paper at 600 is an intirely different game.
This is one of the beauties of the 223 and AR-15 rifles. They offer you a lot of vesatility, bullet choices, plus accuracy. They can be set up to perform many task equally as well as any other design ever developed.
Byron