Quote:
Quote:
I have and do shoot both easton epics and red head carbons..
I give the advantage to the eastons in the lighter GPIs, but the heavier red heads are pretty dang good.. Not sure what the difference is, but I can tell a difference when the arrows get lighter.
I did not notice a drop difference when going from red head 250s to the 350s even at 50 yards..
Bass pro always has a sale in the summer and sell red heads cheap..
Also, IMHO, I would never use a 125 grain broadhead with carbon arrows.. Its just too heavy on the front end causing a weaker spine.
Did you say the epics are $46 more a dz? Where I get my arrows, the red heads and epics are withing a couple dollars...
Tim,
Hey they are the Fury's with 2 inch blazer vains. Are the new Epics HIT cause the ones from 2 years ago were not.
psychowolverine,
Yes the Redheads at Bass Pro are $55 a dozen with the blazers on already.
The epics are $65 without fletchings on them so at 3 dollars and arrow to fletch them it works out to be $46 more for the epics.
The HIT technology is overrated IMHO...
I usually find the epics at a local archery shop here for $59.95 a dz fletched, cut, and with inserts. The ones I get are the epic STs without the HIT though. That could be the difference.
IMHO, the arrows brand is not as important as the broadhead. Yes there are different qualities and consistencies among arrows, but there are many good arrows out there, especially carbons, but the cutting surface is what gets the job done.
I have never shot the red head carbon furys, but they are the low end and I would at lease step up to the red head carbon supremes in 350. Before to long, basspro should run a special on them and can probably get the supremes, with blazer vanes and dipped for about $65 or $69/dz