According to this link...
http://nightforceoptics.com/doc_center/NXS-Precision-UserManual.pdf
Nightforce scopes have a LIFETIME warranty, not two years.
As far as the glass, my cousin's BR 12-42 x 56 is probably the best glass I've ever looked through in a scope. When the glass is good enough to see .22 caliber bullet holes easily at 600 yards, and this scope under most conditions even picks up bullet holes at 1000 yards--that's not good glass, it's
great glass. Making a 42 power scope which is able to remain clear at 42X is no small feat.
I do agree with above that the Bushnell 4200's are among the best glass available. In many tests, the 4200's come in ahead of Schott glassed scopes (European stuff). And the 4200 glass is
Japanese lest we forget.
Eyes resolve color differently, however, and one guy's favorite contrast may not be the fave of another. Contrast, not resolution, is the major difference we'll see in riflescope optics in the better scopes. A Swedish hunting magazine recently tested the resolution of different scopes in different price ranges, and believe it or not the Burris Fullfield II scored 10 out of 10 in resolution. It lost points on light gathering and contrast, but as far as being clear, the glass was as
clear as any they tested.
If you've looked through a Nightforce that seemed blurry, you likely did not have the focus settings adjusted properly. If you can say with certainty that you
did have the adjustments set properly, I can say with certainty that the scope you were looking through was defective--not typical.
The S&B's are great glass, and I like the contrast the coating provides--it really helps in a hunting scope as a deer 400 yards away, against a tree line at dusk, will be easier to see and therefore shoot.
However, I don't believe that any of the Euro scopes can compare with the absolute rock solid sturdiness of the Nightforce NXS. The NXS has incredibly repeatable turrets, and is as robust a scope as anyone anywhere makes.
I do think the U.S. Optics scopes are tough customers as well, but I have some concerns about the long term staying power of U.S. Optics. I hope they make it. They've got a very small, niche market, and S&B and Nightforce are cutting into it. I'd hate to be the "proud owner" of a fifteen hundred dollar scope without a viable manufacturer to back it.
One reason the S&B's aren't favored by long range shooters is (in addition to the afformentioned lack of MOA value turrets) is their limited erector travel. Even the tactical PMII's need to be mounted on a slanted base to reach 1000 yards. But I do think that S&B is offering an MOA click version of that scope...
Keep in mind, regarding European made scopes: The Euro's value against the Dollar these days is keeping the prices of the S&B's, Swaro's and Euro made Zeiss scopes higher than they might otherwise be. So cost of manufacturing is likely similar to other fine scopes made in other areas of the world. It wouldn't make good sense to assume a 2000 dollar S&B, by mere virtue of its cost, is better than a 1200 dollar scope made in Japan. In fact, Japanese manufacturing has pretty much left European quality in the dust when it comes to cars. German made cars now have one of the lowest reliabilty ratings in the entire automotive industry. So an 80,000 dollar Mercedes is in many cases "less" car than a 45,000 dollar Lexus. Just ask Consumer Reports, or any number of other agencies that rate customer satisfaction.
With the
possible exception of the S&B PM II's, there really isn't a Euro scope being made to compare
mechanically with the Nightforce models. The NF's are heavy for a reason. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
Dan