bushnell elite 3200

The 3200 is a great scope with glass as clear as scopes costing twice the money.

I wouldn't go any cheaper. If you do, you get out of the "quality" line of scopes.
 
I have a bushnell elite 3200 4x12x40 on my ar and I really like it. It has great glass and it is clear. You can't go wrong with the 3200.
 
I have two 3200's and two 4200's. I also have a Nikon Buckmaster. The Bushnells are extremely clear as was previously stated. I have compared the glass to others that I have owned costing 3x as much, and I can honestly say that they are just as clear and repeatable. You can't go wrong with one. The Nikon isn't bad, but it isn't as good IMO. They (Bushnell Elites) are incredible scopes for the money.
 
I have two 3200's and a new 6500. Being a long time Lupe guy I find the Bushnell's to be very good. They are the old Bausch & Lomb line...I think.

The 3200's are fantastic.

The 6500 is incredible!
 
I use to cuss bushnell say 7-8 years ago with the trophy line and said I would never own another one. Went to Nikon and Leupold scopes and said I would never look back. I now own a Bushnell 3200 in 3-9x40, a 4200 in 6-24x40, and two 6500. I have a 4.5-30x50 and a 2.5-16x42. These are some fine glass. Like stated above.. The 6500 line is incredible glass for the money. Go with the bushnell. You will not be disappointed, but stay in the Elite series of scopes.
 
I've had good luck with Bushnell Elites. I even tried one with the Firefly reticle, which I found not quite to my taste. I'm about to post it for sale if you're interested in trying a lightly used one.
 
I have a Bushnell Legend 5-15x40 and its nice still has the RainGaurd HD and its pretty dam nice i think the same i think that Bushnell was struggling back in the day but now they are very nice you will love the 3200 Elite
 
I was very dissapointed in my 3x9x50 3200 elite, field of view was small, i mean small, it was clear with no eye relief. ed
 
I have 2 3200's on a couple rifles. The 3x9 is on my .22k Hornet, and the 5-15 Firefly is on my Tikka .223. Very clear glass. If you find a good price on one Id reccommend one. Its way better than alot that you see at the bargain places. A good test is to crank it up to full power, and watch the colors.. a cheap scope makes the colors kind of fade out. The Bushnell will stay bright. Good Luck.
 
I have a 3200 in 5x15 and I really like it. They are alot better than the lower line of bushnells. Infact I think they are held to the standards of the Bausch and lomb that they replaced. Side by side I can't really tell any difference between my Leupolds vs the 3200. But then again I haven't looked through a 3x9 3200, or used one to give you my opinon on that model. Good luck
 
I can tell you this - when it comes to hunting at night (hogs in Texas), I'd rather have my 3200 3-9 than my 3-9 Leupold Varix II. The VariX III is better though...
 
I have three 3200's and another on the way, it's a 4-12x40 doa for my 6.8spc. The doa is supposed to line up just about perfect for that caliber with the 110gr's that i'm using, i'll know by the end of the week. 3200's are great glass. blue
 
Bausch & Lomb used to own Bushnell, and the Elite series had the B&L name on it.I have an older B&L Elite 3000,(pre rain guard). B&L got out of the scope market and Bushnell bought the line from B&L. The Elite series is the same as when B&L used to build them.

Mike
 
I own three Bushnell 3200's. One is a 7-21x mil-dot, one started out a 7-21x mil-dot, but I had the reticle changed, and the last one is a 3-10. I have several Leupolds, and they are good scopes, but I believe the 3200's are clearer. I'm not sure that the 3200 isn't the best scope buy on the market.
 
I own a bushnell elite 4200 3x9 in my .243 Sako l479 forester and I am very happy with it.. I have owned from cheap simmons to high end leupold mark IV tacticals and IMHO you can't find a better for the same amount of money.. plus got the rainguard jacket for free too.. a so called $99.00 jacket.. whether or not $99 it works like a champ too..
thumbup1.gif



-Juan
 
Back
Top