Colorado Wildlife Commission to ban Varmint hunting


Ban on prairie dog shoots shot down


GRAND JUNCTION - The Colorado Wildlife Commission voted unanimously Thursday to reject a petition to ban prairie dog shoots.


Prairie dog shoots, sometimes organized as competitions, have long riled environmentalists who note that the animals are important because they provide food for many other species and their burrows provide shelter.

"The options are the courthouse or the ballot box," said Jay Tutchton, an attorney representing WildEarth Guardians, based out of Santa Fe, N.M.

WildEarth Guardians contended the "shooting of live animals as targets" violates the Colorado law against animal cruelty.

Shooting prairie dogs can't be considered hunting because participants "are not involved in the principles of fair chase and they gather none of the body parts for use," said Nicole Rosmarino, the group's wildlife program.

State wildlife staffers had recommended that commissioners reject the petition, saying that landowners need to be able to control prairie dogs because they damage their properties. A staffer with the Colorado Attorney General's office also said the shooting of prairie dogs fits into the exemption allowed for hunting under the state animal cruelty law.

Wildlife officials also dismissed arguments that shooting prairie dogs would further reduce the animal's numbers.

Wildlife advocates say prairie dogs have been eliminated from most of their historic range, and they have sued to try to force the federal government to declare the rodents endangered.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has said Gunnison's prairie dog populations in south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico warrant federal protection but that other species are considered higher priorities.
 


Prairie dog killing can continue
Issue could go to ballot

BY MARIJA B. VADER
GRAND JUNCTION, CO
May 2, 2008

Despite Thursday’s unanimous decision by the Colorado Wildlife Commission to continue allowing prairie dog shooting, the topic won’t soon die.

“We’re definitely not done with this issue,” said Nicole Rosemarino, wildlife program director for WildEarth Guardians. The group presented a petition to the commission in January to ban target shooting of prairie dogs.

Thursday, the commission rejected the petition, siding with the dozen or so private landowners, hunters and ranchers who testified against it. Three testified on behalf of prairie dogs.

After the hearing, Rosemarino said she opposed all shooting of prairie dogs, not just recreational target shooting.

Farmers and ranchers support shooting prairie dogs because they eat hay, destroy feed and create holes that horses and livestock can stumble into, breaking legs and leading to the horses’ and cows’ deaths.

WildEarth attorney Jay Tutchton said the group may either take the issue to a ballot and let the electorate decide or appeal the commission’s decision to court.

Rosemarino and Tutchton both said they haven’t yet decided what to do.

They argued prairie dogs are essential to Colorado’s ecosystem. Also, they said, it’s cruel to kill the animals.

Rosemarino said in true hunting, hunters eat their prey, but in prairie dog hunting, they don’t.

A member of the National Rifle Association, Alan Jones said the issue is a gun rights and hunting issue.

Jones said the prairie dog issue reminded him of the successful effort to eliminate Colorado’s spring bear hunt. The hunt was outlawed in 1992 by successful statewide vote after proponents gathered enough signatures to put it on the petition.
“That was absolutely wrong,” Jones said.

Last year, according to Division of Wildlife records, lawful hunters killed 615 bears, and 315 were killed after being dubbed “problem bears,” Jones said.

“If we start this with prairie dogs, no telling where this will go,” Jones said.

Veterinarian David Kuntz owns a ranch in Delta County. He’s tried poisoning, trapping and smoke bombing the animals, to no avail.

“Shooting is the only effective control,” Kuntz said. The first year he moved there and shot prairie dogs, his hay production increased by 300 tons, he said. Kuntz said his ranch would be out of business in five years if shooting prairie dogs was outlawed.

His neighbor, Dave Whittlesey ranches elk and buffalo, and he shoots 20 to 30 prairie dogs a day year-round. Prairie dog holes cost him two buffalo cows after they broke their legs.

“I can’t tell you how many eagles we feed,” Whittlesey said. “It’s not a waste.”
Prairie dogs are “the most destructive animal on the planet,” said Gary Volk, an Eckert rancher.

If shooting prairie dogs was outlawed, landowners would be eligible for game damage, Volk said.

“We’ve got better things to do, better things to talk about than god-d***** prairie dogs,” said outfitter Tom Mikesell. He brought one of two petitions that day before the commission to retain prairie dog hunting.

Jim West didn’t buy the cruelty to animals argument because prairie dogs are “varmints.”

“Cruelty to animals doesn’t apply to extermination of pests,” West said. Furthermore, wildlife and hunting rules “doesn’t say I have to eat the mice I catch in my garage.”

Recreational shooting of prairie dogs is “pure violence,” said Holly Tarry, Colorado director for the Humane Society of the U.S. Furthermore, lethal lead from bullets is passed on to raptors, killing them, she said.

No figures were presented that would support the lead claim.
 

http://216.119.77.80/library/paper.asp?nMode=1&nLibraryID=625

Press Release

DATE: 4/30/2008


Prairie Dogs In The Crosshairs

NRA & Wildlife Advocates Poised for Battle before Wildlife Commission


Grand Junction, CO. WildEarth Guardians is running a large ad in today's Grand Junction Daily Sentinel with a photo of a prairie dog in crosshairs, which reads "Shoot Pop Cans, not Prairie Dogs" and urges concerned citizens to contact the Colorado Wildlife Commission to demand an end to high body count wildlife shoots.

At its meeting in Grand Junction tomorrow, the Commission will consider whether or not to allow shooters to use live animals for target practice. While relatively few engage in prairie dog shoots, one person can kill several hundred animals in a day. Internet sites advertise shooting tours and celebrate when prairie dog bodies explode into "red mist." The Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW), however, is siding with prairie dog shooters, saying that prairie dogs cause damage to rangeland and must be controlled.

"We are amazed that the state's wildlife agency is siding with an extreme fringe that derive a perverted pleasure from exploding wildlife," said Nicole Rosmarino of WildEarth Guardians.

In January, WildEarth Guardians requested that the Wildlife Commission ban the practice of shooting live animals as targets. "Prairie dog shooters are not hunters but are simply in it for target practice or sadistic amusement. But for the DOW's mischaracterization of this practice as hunting it would be animal cruelty under state law," said Jay Tutchton, General Counsel for WildEarth Guardians.

While citizens' petitions normally go through a three-step process, in an unusual move, the DOW posted a rulemaking notice that states that the Commission had the right to stop the process at the second hearing. "The agency is apparently trying to end the process early because they find examination of prairie dog shooters' behavior embarrassing and are pandering to the lowest common denominator," said Tutchton.

The National Rifle Association and Colorado Trappers' Association have been mobilizing their members against a ban on prairie dog shooting. They have accused WildEarth Guardians of trying to ban all hunting through this petition. But the Colorado Wildlife Federation, a local hunting group, testified at the March hearing that these kinds of shoots raise alarming issues, particularly that prairie dog shoots do not allow for fair chase, a major tenet of ethical hunting.

"The opposition's argument that we are trying to ban all hunting makes no sense, as prairie dog shooting is not hunting. In fact, ethical hunters disagree with the practice, given that it lacks any iota of sportsmanship. In short, prairie dogs are not pop cans," said Rosmarino.

In addition to discussing how prairie dog shooting is not hunting, WildEarth Guardians' petition documents the decline of prairie dogs, their importance to a variety of wildlife, and the danger of environmental contamination from lead shot-especially to raptor populations such as hawks and eagles.

The DOW is expected to testify in support of prairie dog shooting at Thursday's hearing, echoing arguments from prairie dog shooters that prairie dogs harm rangeland. But WildEarth Guardians says the science shows that prairie dogs are good for Colorado's environment and do not cause harm to ranching.

"Not only have a myriad of biologists documented that that prairie dogs have evolved over millions of years in the American West and are in fact a crucial force in maintaining healthy grasslands, but they are alarmed at the enormous decline in their populations across the West," said Dr. Rosmarino.

What: Colorado Wildlife Commission discussion on petition to ban prairie dog shooting.

Where: Holiday Inn, 755 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO.

When: Thursday, May 1 at 11:15 am (agenda is subject to change).

Other: WildEarth Guardians staff will be on-site and available by cellphone.


The public can submit comments on the petition to ban prairie dog shooting by emailing: wildlife.comm@state.co.us For more background information, please contact Nicole Rosmarino at nrosmarino@wildearthguardians.org or 505-699-7404.

View WildEarth Guardian's ad in today's Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

View WildEarth Guardian's Action Alert

View WildEarth Guardians' Petition

View the Unprecedented DOW Rulemaking Notice & DOW Agenda

View the DOW's Position to Maintain Prairie Dog Shoots as a Management Option

Read about the Colorado Trapper's Association's Antics in the Craig Daily Press

View National Rifle Association's Action Alert

Contacts:
Nicole J. Rosmarino | WildEarth Guardians | 505.699.7404
Jay Tutchton | Denver University Environmental Law Clinic | 720.301.3843
 
No doubt that there will be plenty of new attacks on all of us hunters that choose to try to help maintain prairie dog numbers from getting out of hand. There's no doubt in my mind that this will end up on a ballot in the not so far off future! Run a few bleeding heart ads. on the local TV stations and plenty of non-hunters will fall for thier retoric!
But, for now, at least we can still keep the little rodents in check for the local ranchers!

And one great BIG PAT on the back to all those that were able to show up and stand up at the DOW meeting. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif
 
Last edited:
I just got back into town. I couldn't get internet service at the Motel 6 I was at. It was unanimous. 9-0 defeat. http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/content/news/stories/2008/05/01/050208_1b_Wildlife_commission.html

The crowd was overflowing. They opened a divider to an adjoining room for the overflow crowd. The State was not expecting that large of a turnout. Traditionally, the anti's have very little opposition at these meetings.

I would estimate there was between 120-130 people in attendance. About 8-10 were wearing the ARA stickers. The rest were there to defeat the Pdog ban. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif

The "Guardians" had 3 speakers (including their lawyer), who tried their hardest to elicit tears and compassion from a room full of cattle ranchers, sheep ranchers, hunting outfitters and guides, wheat, corn, and alfalfa farmers, trappers, land owners, and a sh!tt load of dedicated (and determined) varmint hunters. Speaking in opposition to the ban were at least 3 representatives from each of the above groups.

The ARA's were totally unprepared for such a show of force. Every one of their lofty "arguments" was repudiated with facts and data. Their contention that the "majority" of citizens of CO support the PD ban was blown out of the water when we presented 3 different stacks of signed petitions, demanding defeat of the ban, amounting to almost 8,000 signatures! They apparently didn't think they needed evidence of their "support", as they had no signatures to present. They were flat on their back!

Three TV station camera crews were there to "capture the drama". Two newspaper reporters were there as well. There were GJ Police posted at the doors, and there were about 10-12 uniformed (and armed) CDOW wardens and officers monitoring the crowd. I don't know what, or "who", prompted them to supervise the event with such a display of firepower. Everyone was on their best behavior. The City and CDOW LEO's were visibly supportive of the effort to defeat the ban. Very possibly a few PD shooters behind those badges! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

This is an excellent example of what we can do! There was no "leader" or "organizer" responsible for the overall effort. The stockmen organized themselves, as did the farmers, hunters, and outfitters. Can you imagine the impact we could have as a unified front? This was a "team" effort, in every sense of the word.

I'm grateful for all the support and cooperation in fighting this battle. And it is just one battle in the war against any and all who would try to destroy our sport and way of life.
 
NASA--You guys enjoy the well deserved victory, but beware.

Back in Washington State in the early '90's these SOB's used paid signature gathers and got a ballot initiative outlawing bear baiting and hound hunting that passed.

They are going to use their free (YOUR tax dollar funded) legal team to continue this in the courts and I'll bet they follow through on their threats to go for a ballot initiative, too.

I think this was sort of their recon mission--just to probe around and determine the strength of their opposing force.

My guess is that they will be back with renforcements.

I'd start making noise now about your tax-funded Univ of Denver School of Law acting against citizens. Sounds like that law school is over-funded and needs some severe budget cuts!

Great job you guys and I hope you were also able to network with the ranchers and wool growers, too, so when this pops up again everybody can pool resources.
 
Quote:
I'd start making noise now about your tax-funded Univ of Denver School of Law acting against citizens. Sounds like that law school is over-funded and needs some severe budget cuts!



The University of Denver is a 100% private school therefore we don't have the tax dollar tool to use.

Part of the law school curriculum is a specified number of hours that must qualify as community service practice and I suspect the Forest Guardian work falls in that category. However, it sure doesn't pass the smell test and we are going to do more research on it.
 
Do you suppose that would be considered "biased" media coverage? The pro-ban ARA's got 5 times more interview exposure than the winning side did. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
 
Quote:
Do you suppose that would be considered "biased" media coverage? The pro-ban ARA's got 5 times more interview exposure than the winning side did. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif



Yes, I think that is a fairly safe assessment. But then whoever said things were going to be fair?

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
 
Well, that tight little blond from HSUS believes things should be "fair". In fact, she stood at the podium and, fighting back the tears, said, "Shooting prairie dogs just isn't fair! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
Quote:
Well, that tight little blond from HSUS believes things should be "fair". In fact, she stood at the podium and, fighting back the tears, said, "Shooting prairie dogs just isn't fair! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif



She obviously has never watched me shoot and counted my missed shots! The one's that stand still have the best chance of surviving!

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

I see your buddy Nicole is a vegetarian. She probably wouldn't be interested in our camp out then. Just can't imagine leaving all that good ground chuck out of the chili.
 
More good news from western colorado..........................................Furhunters headache has gone away!!!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
Quote:
More good news from western colorado..........................................Furhunters headache has gone away!!!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif



Any idea as to what may have caused it? Any chance you could be allergic to lime juice?

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

BTW, a special thanks to you and Miss Alice for the hospitality and great food.
 
Quote:
Quote:
More good news from western colorado..........................................Furhunters headache has gone away!!!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif



Any idea as to what may have caused it? Any chance you could be allergic to lime juice?

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif



I think it was the trip to margaritaville.......the Presidente Brandy mixer must have done it /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

I may have some hair of the dog tonite /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Quote:
BTW, a special thanks to you and Miss Alice for the hospitality and great food.



Your welcome, We really enjoyed the company!
 
Quote:
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif I'm innocent! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif



Liar.......... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

I told you I had a weak spot for Patron. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Course had I not influenced you in to ordering the Presidente from Chili's the other nite..........we may have never gone down this road eh? I guess it is my own fault then /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
One of the arguements the animal rights groups use is the lead bullet left inside the PD carcasses. How much lead could there be after a .22-250 55 grain bullet shoots clear through the little buggers?

Let the animal rights people gather scientific evidence if they want to use that arguement; it is not for the world of theory.

Just a thought.....
 
Back
Top