Took both to the range today to double check my zero's. Accuracy was probably a toss up, may give just a slight edge to the T/C. Both rifles wear 3x9 Nikons and both are 50 caliber. Both shooting 110 grains of Blackhorn powder and a 250 grain T/C Shockwave sabot with a Winchester 209 primer. First thing I noticed was the recoil of the Omega. It was a lot stouter than the CVA. Why??? How knows. Loading, the CVA was a bunch easier to load than the Omega. You really had to muscle up to shove a sabot down the barrel of the Omega. The CVA was a breeze to load. Breech plug removal, hands down goes to the CVA, no tools needed with the CVA, you need wrenches for the T/C. Priming and cocking, again goes to the CVA. Being a break open the breech plug is right there easy to prime while the Omega, you have to fumble around the scope and unless using a priming tool, kind of a hassle. All in all, the CVA is IMO just as good a rifle as the T/C and has a few features that I like better on the CVA. Both shoot MOA pretty easy so like I was saying, its a toss up there. The T/C is a little lighter so to some that might be a factor. Just a little comparison of two rifles. Both will kill with authority and now I have two that are ready to hunt!! Just comparing two rifles.