Democrat Party

Obama judge tosses Alaska Senate case
The Justice Department recently sued over Alaska’s questionable Senate election, trying to block the certification of the state’s Senate results if Republican incumbent Dan S. Sullivan loses. Even The New York Times admitted that Democrat Mary Peltola’s campaign recruited Dan J. Sullivan to run as a spoiler candidate to confuse voters and siphon votes from the real Sullivan. Alaska uses a ranked-choice election system, which opens the door to this voter-confusion tactic. On Sunday, however, an Obama-appointed judge rejected the DOJ’s bid, arguing that the Justice Department didn’t explain how it planned to address the issue without compromising ballot secrecy. The DOJ appealed the ruling to the San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
 
Stu Farish said:
Schumer's big personal lie: Politicians are infamous for bending the truth, but their lies aren't often complete fiction made up out of whole cloth. Recently, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was blasted across social media for his repeated references to "the Baileys," whom he describes as a "middle-class couple" from "a suburb on Long Island" who "bought into Reagan Republicanism in 1980." Schumer made extensive notes of the Baileys over the years, including in his book Positively American: Winning Back the Middle-Class Majority One Family at a Time. He even claims, "I have guided my political life through the Baileys." So, who are the Baileys? Well, it turns out they don't actually exist; they are simply a figment of Schumer's imagination. And "Bailey" wasn't even their original name. A former spokesman for Schumer noted that he used to ask his staff, "What would the O'Reillys think?"
Click to expand...
Wtf
 
DSA candidates could be barred from Congress
A “loophole” of sorts in the Constitution may bar Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members elected to Congress from serving. All elected members must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before becoming full members of the House or Senate. However, any member-elect can challenge another member-elect’s right to be sworn in if evidence shows the latter would not serve and defend the Constitution while in public office. For any DSA member in either chamber, the evidence is well known. The DSA’s platform includes a call to “draft a new constitution, and create a democratic socialist republic.” Based on that, no DSA member should be sworn into the House or the Senate. Certain lawmakers have suggested that they would invoke the maneuver, which would make for a very interesting January.
 
Stu Farish said:
DSA candidates could be barred from Congress
A “loophole” of sorts in the Constitution may bar Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members elected to Congress from serving. All elected members must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before becoming full members of the House or Senate. However, any member-elect can challenge another member-elect’s right to be sworn in if evidence shows the latter would not serve and defend the Constitution while in public office. For any DSA member in either chamber, the evidence is well known. The DSA’s platform includes a call to “draft a new constitution, and create a democratic socialist republic.” Based on that, no DSA member should be sworn into the House or the Senate. Certain lawmakers have suggested that they would invoke the maneuver, which would make for a very interesting January.
Click to expand...
Won't be holding my breath though.....
 
Superior Argument.png
 
Back
Top