Help me explain this ???

Bottom Line is You, and I don't disagree, I'm merely cautioning against letting ES and SD rule the roost. Simply because those values can be lowered by larger data collection sizes, neck tension, primer selection (LR vs SR) and the list goes on.
i wasnt trying to suggest that ES/SD should be the sole considered factor - sorry if it came across that way - just more so that even with smaller data sets that we can still use them in conjunction with accuracy to eliminate loads from further testing :)

one more tool in the toolbox if you will, not that it should be the only tool considered


I was actually hoping that you would pop in here to guide the OP through what the ES and SD actually mean, and how to use it effectively.
After all at one time most thought only ES was the answer, now we are chasing both ES and SD.

i'll happily leave that project to someone else this time around 😁 :LOL:
 
i'll happily leave that project to someone else this time around 😁 :LOL:
No, your good at it haha ....

i wasnt trying to suggest that ES/SD should be the sole considered factor - sorry if it came across that way
You didn't and my comments wasn't meant for you. The comment I was referring was to keep some from focusing just on that.

one more tool in the toolbox if you will, not that it should be the only tool considered
Exactly we agree whole heartily, I'm of the opinion that it should be included in the tool box. See I told you we agree a lot. You have said the exact same thing to me earlier when assisting me in a load. Which is why I said I know we agree to a huge extent. I just suck at conveying my thoughts some times.
 
Back
Top