Ya. I looked down on savage forever until I accidentally bought one on gunbroker. Now half my guns are savage
Savage long gun in .270 to 30-06
glock semi in 9mm to .45
ruger wheelgun 357 to 44m
remy 870 12ga
You can do everything with 4 guns, relatively inexpensively. Throw a 10/22 on there if you want a rimfire
Swap the glock for a sigma, ruger for a taurus and the price drops further. But I'm a fan of those 2 and it's my list so they stay on
That's not to say you should ONLY own 4 guns but I think that will take care of almost every NEED.
Everyone is different, place value where they see fit. For me:
Return On Investment (ROI) for me is always a consideration. Same reason I've owned some really nice, used, cars. I've been making retarded amounts of money the last few years, and I still save where I can. If I'm ever just rich, I'll buy my first new car.
Comping 300-3000 since some jerk came up with those numbers... If I spend 300 on a rifle that works all the time, puts all the bullets where I want all the time leaves me 2700 to buy a truck to go hunting in. And the store, lumber yard etc etc etc. That $2700 is much better used anywhere but on a rifle.
Since the rifle is going to spend a majority of it's time not being used the cost per use of the $300 rifle is quite high. The cost per use of the 3000 rifle is astronomical in comparison. So the ROI on the cheap gun is much better. If the cheap gun just doesn't do the job, it's a total loss. But as long as it does the same as the expensive gun it's a net gain.
That being said, I really want to spend a couple grand on a mateba that I'll probably only shoot once or twice. I think they're neat!