The DNR knows they are here. In the rules and regulations book there is a line in there about not shooting cougars, that they are a federally protected species, but then the DNR's stance, from the one's I've talked to is that the one's in South Carolina are not true wild cougars. They say the same thing over and over, that they are someone's pet that got to big to feed so they released it into the wild. In the letter I got from the DNR, it went on to describe how that half wild cougars, raised by man were more dangerous than wild cougars due to their lack of fear of man. I just think the DNR doesn't want to put up with the outcry from the public knowing that there are wild cougars roaming around, so they come up with the abandoned pet theory. I just can't believe that there are the numbers of ranches somewhere out west that are raising up federally protected cats for sale to individuals elsewhere in the country. How many people do you know that have a pet cougar? I think it is bad how the DNR handles it. Another point, if the DNR says that they are not wild, just abandoned pets, wouldn't shooting one be the same as shooting a wild dog or a ferral cat? If it is a released pet and is more dangerous than a true wild cougar, isn't a problem animal that should be removed? I think the DNR's stance sets them up for not being able to make charges stick on someone who finally ends up shooting one and getting caught in this state, all he'd have to do is argue that their are no wild one's in SC. I know I guy personally, who called the DNR about a bear that he'd been seeing around his house multiple times. Every time the wardon would show up, he'd say there were no bears in that area, that the homeowner must be mistaken it for a big black dog. Well it rocked on and the homeowner shot the bear, here in Anderson county. He took it to the local check station and was having pictures taken all showing it off. A few days later here come the DNR wanting to fine the *&^$ out of him, it went to court and he told the judge about how many times he had called about the bear and about how the wardon had informed him that there were no bears in that area of the state, that what he was seeing was nothing more than a big black dog of which he shot. From my understanding, the charges got throwed out.