Lowest Recoil ??

Quote:
A 204 Ruger has about half the recoil of the 22-250 and a quarter of the recoil of the 223 or 222. I don't know about the 17. Hope this helps.




That doesn't make any sence..... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
 
Last edited:
Quote:
ME- sorry I was trying to say the 204 has about 25% less recoil than a 223. This was told to me by a test writer. I see them as about equal too. Thanks!



Ok, that sounds better. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif
 
Try a left handed gun and experiment with trying to learn shooting from the opposite side just like a baseball player learning to switch hit. Not everyone can do it, but it could be a fun and rewarding learning process.
 
Sporter weight rifle I like .221 and .204....I have both and cannot tell any difference in recoil. In fact if you are shooting from a bench you can shoot either with "no contact".
 
Quote:
I have a 223 and a 204 and by far the 204 has less recoil than my 223 and it has light recoil. The 204 is a Ruger VT



This is what I am leaning towards, in a .204. I handled a VT yesterday, and it is one FINE feeling rifle. I have always shot M77's, and they are "comfy" to me.

I can't thank everyone enough for their input and valuable information. THANKS!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gif
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top