Originally Posted By: orkanOriginally Posted By: CZ527I honestly can remember the last time I missed things right and left all day long, but I do spend a ton of time shooting. Practice makes “nearly” perfect I guess.
As for why I’d choose a 10 over an 8, it’s just enough to suit the bullets I like shooting. I guess this is one of those “duh” moments as I don’t know what else to say. It is FACT that peak pressure will stick its ugly head up sooner with a fast twist barrel. Why give up velocity?
I spend a good deal of time thinking about what I want before I build it, so I don’t fear floating desires.
High BC bullets are better in the wind? Huh? No [beeep]? Never heard that one before.
Never understood hunting prairie dogs either. They’re a pain in the [beeep] alright, but they were here first.
You do you, that’s great. I just don’t think you should call a new member foolish for not agreeing with you.
I didn't call a new member foolish. I said choosing a 10 twist over an 8 twist is foolish. I speak from a substantial amount of first hand experience. I wonder, how many .223AI's have you done load work on? What is your occupation? It's my job to know this stuff, and I take it quite seriously. Since you admit to not prairie dog shooting, you can simply replace that activity with shooting 3" targets at close to far distances at various angles to the wind and various inclinations in actual field conditions in varying terrain. Regardless of how you describe the activity, the demand to hit very small targets consistently at extended ranges is there. If you seriously are proclaiming that you are just so good that you can call the wind every single time well enough to hit a 3" target at 600yds with a bullet carrying a ballistic coefficient of around .200 when the wind is gusting from 8-18mph... then I guess you must be one of those shooters I always hear about on the internet. Congrats to you, because most people can not make that shot on the first round when asked to do it. Not with the configuration you're suggesting. Yet with an 80gr class bullet, it's not too difficult, given roughly twice the BC.
Have you owned an 8 twist as well as a 10 twist .223AI? Because I have done considerable load development with both, as well as 12 and 14 twist rifles, and "peak pressure" doesn't "stick its ugly head up sooner" with an 8 twist than it does a 10. There is no velocity difference between an 8 twist and a 10 twist with light weight bullets. When comparing a 14 twist and an 8 twist, you might, and I emphasize might, see a velocity gain with light bullets in the 14 twist... but it will not be greater than the barrel to barrel velocity variance typically seen anyway. So in other words, less than 100fps, which can not be laid at the feet of any one barrel. Based on my experience, maybe a 14 twist could account for 35-50fps gain over an 8 twist... but you'd have to do some very questionable juggling of the numbers to fully account that for the twist rate alone.
I could provide a summary of my experience and hard data with the above couple dozen rifles, but it is quite clear to me that I'd be wasting my time. I've seen your interactions with people in previous threads and no amount of data I lay against this will sway your opinion. Swear all you like, expound all you like... but until you prove to me that you can eclipse my own level of experience with a great deal of various configurations of .223AI's... I'll not respond to you further.
I like how you tried to stack this deck in your favor, with that .200 BC, which I wouldn’t sling for nothing but fox hunting. 69 Sierra or the new 70 RDF (which I’ve verified the BC out to a modest 915 yards with less than 1/4 minute of vertical) is where I’d look for precision work from a 10 twist.
I cant speak for specific experience with a 3” target at 600 yards, though I do have both 2” and 4” at 635 yards, which is where a lot of my extended load verification is done.
As for load development with 223 AI, I guess you’ve got me there as I’ve always believed putting a skunk in the oven wouldn’t make it a biscuit. I spoke only from experience with a couple dozen 223, maybe half a dozen ‘250s and the fraternal Beanland twins, 22x47 and 22 Dasher. Same bullets, same formulas, different headstamps.
As for shooting in the wind, take the time to check my local weather, I am blessed to live in a place where I can get better every day. We call 8 mph modest, very modest.
So far in 2018, I’ve fired roughly 4,000 purposeful, centerfire rifle rounds. I take a lot of pride in running my gun and not my mouth, which I am well aware is a trait we share.
I try to shoot with the best I can, to share and absorb knowledge, always holding the mantra that you’ll never get any better assuming you know it all.
Perhaps I’ve taken you the wrong way, I don’t know. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s hard to let things roll off when you use words like foolish, given some of your content in the past wherein others were likely made to feel belittled. Sharing opinions is one thing (LOVE that annealing video and use your method) but thumping your chest is another. That being said, I know you’ve spent years and years behind a rifle and can really shoot well. It just really rubs me wrong when you automatically assume you’re the only one with such qualifications that chooses to grace this website.
Again, if you mean well, great. I apologize. I guess I’ll never know, as you’ve stated I won’t get a reply.