Not that impressed with Tikka

Craig

New member
Recently I purchased a stainless varmit in 7mm rem mag, below is my subjective review.

I got my new tikkia a couple days ago, and to tell you the truth I'm not all that impressed with it. Now I'm not a gun expert my any means, so take what you will from this review. But I feel that I could have spent as much, and perhaps less to get a better rifle then the Tikkia I have.

-The stock I'm less then impressed by the stock. In my hands and on my shoulders it feels cheap. The lines from the injection molding are plain as day and quiet sharp. The checkering (if thats what you call it) doesn't provide a good grip at all, and is more cosmetic then anything. It touches the barrel in places where it shouldn't so out come the sand paper.

-The action.. Grrr.... While opperating the bolt is smooth, its also feels lightweight and well frankly cheap. I know this is subjective, but it doesn't feel right moving the bolt back and forth. Not to mention that there is a lot of rattle, or free play. I own and have used other guns that have a bolt throw as smooth as a tikka, yet they all feel better to opperate. The tikka feels like a toy.

-The recoil lug, or lack of. Good rifles have recoil lugs, cheap rifles have washers in the stock and a slot cut out of the action. Guess what the tikka employs. As I have said before, I'm not a gun expert, and I don't know what differance this really makes, but when I look at it, it screams sub-par.

-The mag. I have seen plastic mags before, own a couple rifles with them. The tikka on the other hand takes cheaply produced POS to another level.

-The rings. I didn't notice at the time of purchase but my gun was missing them. Called the gun store and they said its Tikka's problem, so I called them and they said its the gun store problem. Either way no one wanted to give me a set of rings so it turned into my $50 problem. This isn't really a knock on Tikka as this can, and has happened with any other company, but annoying to say the least.

_The hockey puck on the but AKA the recoil pad. First off it doesn't fit the stock at all, not even close. Second its a 7mm rem mag, yet the recoil pad I'm sure, is made of the same type of plastic they make hockey pucks out of. The first thing I did was buy an after market that not only fit the stock better but works a zillion times better.

-Tje ejection port is so short and small that single loading at live round is problematic. Also when ejecting a live round it tends to get caught and fall back down ontop of the mag. Emptys eject smartly however.

-Plastic trigger guard. Look I take care of my guns, and I don't throw them around. But I'm sure that in the -30 temps I hunt in, in Canada, I'm going to break that trigger guard. If you have never tried to carry or hunt with a rifle without a trigger guard you have no idea how important that part is. I would rather throw away the mag then break the trigger guard, yet they make this out of plastic. GRRRRRR....
 
Last edited:
I don't think its fair to post a slam job with out giving the good points.

-It shoots. This is the reason I bought the rifle, since everyone and thier crippled house cat said it would shoot well. I tried 3 brands, and 5 weights, of factory ammo that I could find, and it shoot each one under an inch, a lot less in a few cases.

But frankly I have a lot of rifles that shoot well, and they are better built and cost less to boot.

I'm am more then happy with the performance of the rifle. And not at all happy with the built quality of it. I feel that I could have spent as much or less and came out with a better built rifle that shoots just as well.
 
Originally Posted By: Chapped LipsGunBroker.com
GunsAmerica.com
(how did you ever leave the store with it?)

Varmit rifle chambered in 7mm rem meg. Special order. I like heavy guns, so I ordered one. I know full well that I should have done some more holding of tikka's, and maybe borrowed one to shoot before I ordered this. I have no one but my self to blame for the purchase, I know that just thought I would share my thoughts here so maybe others take a second look at one.
 
(how did you ever leave the store with it?) [/quote]

I was kind of wondering the same. I'm not disagreeing with what you have wrote. All that (except for the cartridge extraction) could have been learned/observed in the store. I'm curious why you didn't spend the money on another rifle as your last statement says?
 
I guess you responded with my answer as I was typing the last post. Did you have to buy it when you placed the order?
 
Originally Posted By: Chapped LipsGunBroker.com
GunsAmerica.com
(how did you ever leave the store with it?)

Sell it ASAP.
wink.gif

No use to keep a gun you hate so bad.
 
I think you should box it up and send it to me. It would fit great in my safe with the rest of my cheap tikka's. Seriously though I was of the same thought of you when I purchased my first t-3 lite stainless. I thoght man this thing is kind of ugly and cheap. Then as time went on and I kept shooting it and hunting with it I just kept appreciating it more. I have put my tikka's through the ringer and nothing stops them or makes them malfunction. I have one that is my dedicated calling rifle and I do most of my calling on full moon nites when it is perferably -20 or colder windchill. I don't know what they make the trigger guard and magazine out of but it is next to indestructable believe it or not. Mine has taken some pretty hard knocks off the ice and no problems. Somehow when everything you point the gun at and shoot dies it suddenly becomes a beautiful rifle. Do some hunting with it and give it a try. I will agree with you on one thing though the recoil pad does leave alot to be desired to say the least.
 
Originally Posted By: BBsteelI guess you responded with my answer as I was typing the last post. Did you have to buy it when you placed the order?

Yes I did.

For a while I thought that the only thing I cared about was a gun that could shoot. And to tell you the truth, its still the most important thing about a firearm. After reading 701 reviews about how well people's tikka's shot I thought it was the gun for me. Not to mention that its one of the few rifles that can be ordered in a varmit config in almost any caliber.

Now at the end of the day I have no one but my self to blame for the purchase. I simply went on what I had seen rifles do at the range, and what I had read about here and other sites. And to be fair the rifle did what I expected it to do, shot little groups. I did not however look at the gun carefully enough before buying it, or didn't care enough about its flaws.

I really hope this post doesn't come accross as "oh woh is me" or asking for sympathy. I bought the gun, and it does what it should. However, it still has its flaws, and I thought that being a public forum its not a bad idea to point it out.
 
Well at least you bought a "cheap" rifle and it still shoots. THats really the bottom line in my book.

I still put tikka in a class waaaaay above savage, talk about cheap rifles...

I went on a whim and bought a savage, knowing that I never would without all the good talk you read about them on the net, and indeed it was a cheap rifle, a stainless/synthetic in 270 WSM. I was assured though by hundreds of people it would be a .5" rifle at 100 yards. More like 1.5" on a good day IME with A LOT of different bullets/powder/primers/OAL's.

My dad has a tikka t3 lite in a 7 RM and I see the same problems you describe. However, the thing shoots 1/2" groups at 100 yards with the first load we put in the thing and it just continues to do so. The mag has never broke, the trigger gaurd hasn't broke. The ejection port is my biggest beef with them. WIth a target knob scope, the empty or loaded round hits the windage knob everytime.

Either way, I feel like buying a cheap rifle is a crapshoot these days, but I"d buy a Tikka over Savage based on a straight factory platform anyday. NOw you can build savages to shoot great, dont get me wrong, but that puts itself in a semi-custom class and thats a whole different thing.
 
A couple of weeks ago I had a topic called "Whats up with Tikka"
I was wondering how such a light weight flimsy looking setup preformed so good.
There were many responses, almost all were GOOD.
I happen to LOVE my 2 !!! I have had absolutly NO problems at all ! I have lots of guns that I have paid way more for that dont shoot any better. I was just looking for an economical truck and saddle rifle that I could abuse and also shot well. I found it with Tikka.
My advise to you is , if you dont like it , sell it. But your not buying mine ! LOL
I like heavy rifles also but not for packing in the mountains Elk hunting and walking a mile from the truck to make a call.
If you have an extraction problem, you definatly have something wrong.

Good luck to you......
 
It's always amazing when a gun is put down Savage will come up in the topic. Kinda like a Savage is what all others is judged against. Also I did not have to build my Savage to make it shoot it came shooting right out of the box and it also didn't feel like it was going to snap in two.
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Nikon_Man It's always amazing when a gun is put down Savage will come up in the topic. Kinda like a Savage is what all others is judged against. Also I did not have to build my Savage to make it shoot it came shooting right out of the box and it also didn't feel like it was going to snap in two.
wink.gif


Your right. I have two savages, and like them both, though I don't have the plastic stock on either of them. Both shoot more or less what ever I give them into a nice little group, same as the tikka. I just feel, and this is tottaly subjective, that they are better guns, side by side the tikka feels like a toy.

I don't have an extraction problem, more a problem with the ejection port. Its small enough to make loading a bigger cartridge like a 7mm an issue, and ejecting a live round can cause some problems.

And I don't mean to do a slam job on a tikka, since it does shoot well.
 
Last edited:
Well at least it shoots as claimed. The Tikka's are quite popular and with me too. Of the few complaints the varmint model may get the most for it plastic and appearance. I can only remember hearing of one trigger guard breaking. The magazines have been pretty good with some guys even running them over. Losing it is different because they are spendy.
I have bought a few expensive guns that were wood/metal brand name that would not shoot. The worst was a Weatherby MarkV Deluxe. Could never even get close to 1.5" guarantee Even by moving closer to the target. Now hat's a true POS. Sounds like a Ruger.
So funny that Savage got dragged in again.
 
Originally Posted By: Nikon_Man It's always amazing when a gun is put down Savage will come up in the topic....
that's an excellent point...savage hasn't been afraid to stick a big toe in frozen waters to market an idea.
we shud use the Mossberg ATR...now THAT'S a boat anchor...
 
Originally Posted By: kyotekiller25Well at least you bought a "cheap" rifle and it still shoots. THats really the bottom line in my book.

I still put tikka in a class waaaaay above savage, talk about cheap rifles...

I went on a whim and bought a savage, knowing that I never would without all the good talk you read about them on the net, and indeed it was a cheap rifle, a stainless/synthetic in 270 WSM. I was assured though by hundreds of people it would be a .5" rifle at 100 yards. More like 1.5" on a good day IME with A LOT of different bullets/powder/primers/OAL's.

My dad has a tikka t3 lite in a 7 RM and I see the same problems you describe. However, the thing shoots 1/2" groups at 100 yards with the first load we put in the thing and it just continues to do so. The mag has never broke, the trigger gaurd hasn't broke. The ejection port is my biggest beef with them. WIth a target knob scope, the empty or loaded round hits the windage knob everytime.

Either way, I feel like buying a cheap rifle is a crapshoot these days, but I"d buy a Tikka over Savage based on a straight factory platform anyday. NOw you can build savages to shoot great, dont get me wrong, but that puts itself in a semi-custom class and thats a whole different thing.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like it has turned into a Savage versus Tikka debate.
confused.gif


Originally the author was expalinig his woes with his new Tikka. I think he was right with everything he said. I handled them and I would not care if they shot every bullet in the same hole I would not buy now.

Now the discussion has turned to which rifle is the better choice?? And which rifle is of the highest quality?? Tikka or Savage?? Now that is funny!!

A hunting rifle is just that---a hunting rifle. It does not matter how small of a group you can shoot off of a bench. All that matters is how well the rifle handles and holds up through decades of handling in the woods. How many hunters can hold a sub MOA in a hunting situation?? NONE. So I am amazed at how much importance hunters put on "bench groups", instead of how the rifle feels and handles. Just amazed?? Tom.

 
Last edited:


Write your reply...
Back
Top