Obama's Mother's c.1960 (Redacted) Porn Photos

Javafour

Javafour

New member
Have you guys already discussed these porn photos taken in HI Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, by semi-professional photographer Frank Marshall Davis, a black Communist many think was actually Obama's biological father?

Davis hoped to launch a sex magazine that catered to various fetishes and interracial sex, but never could get it off the ground and ended up selling his negatives to other 'publications'.

These appeared in a sleaze magazine called 'Exotique'.

DunhamNude.jpg



AnnDunham.jpg


This stuff is completely consistent will all I have heard about her during my research of her time on Mercer Island, WA.

Is it her?

What do YOU think?

See next to two photos of Dunham:

ObamaMama.jpg

 
If you had no idea who she was. Or, you didn't know who the photographer was. Or, that their heavily communist indoctrinated son would one day sit as the leader of the most powerfull nation in the world, would you still think she's so repulsive?
Just askin',, 'cause I've ment very few (she's one of the few exceptions) naked women I didn't like lol.
 
NdIndy,I would be willing to bet that stuff has got more good men killed than any other substance.Men have killed for gold,but it was just so they could swap it for that stuff.and even though I know what it is capable of making a man do,I still like it.That just don't make any sense.
 
Originally Posted By: Rim_RunnerThis has got to be the lowest point that this BB has ever achieved.

Interesting conclusion based on the nature of items being discussed. The woman in the photos seems to be willingly posing for these shots, as the back story suggests. Now we are discussing the ramifications of that expression as it relates to a public figure.

What is it exactly that you're so offended by?
 
Quote:What is it exactly that you're so offended by? For starters I’ve never had to worry about opening a PM post at work. Thank goodness no one was by my desk. Next time someone redacts photos like that use a lot more redaction, please.
 
Quote: What is it exactly that you're so offended by?
Now I’ll ask you a question. Don’t you think it’s a little odd that on a site that has been kept free of nude shots all of a sudden allows them without complaint? The difference being that these photos are being used in an attempt to show Obama is a bad light. So what other standards will be overlooked in attempts to smear Obama?
 
Originally Posted By: Rim_RunnerThis has got to be the lowest point that this BB has ever achieved.

Sorry Rimmy, I was not trying to offend anyone--you see more flesh these days at a public beach--but I think these photos, if actually Stanley Ann Dunham (which I believe they are), have substantial historical significance.

Every president of the US has had his genealogy thoroughly examined and the activities of family, especially of immediate family, have always been the subject of legitimate academic inquiry.

The Dunhams fascinate me, given that I lived for about half my childhood on Mercer Island, and know people who knew them, but also because they tell us much about who our president is, as far as him being the product of the people who reared him.

Since he has never renounced his mother and has instead often admiringly invoked her name and memory to inspire sympathy in various speeches, I believe we deserve to know exactly who Stanley Ann Dunham was, that's all.

If Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney's mothers were involved in making fetish and interracial sex pornography as young women, is it not safe to say that the photos would have been plastered all over the MSM?
 
Quote:if actually Stanley Ann Dunham (which I believe they are), have substantial historical significance. and if they aren’t what have you done?
Quote:If Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney's mothers were involved in making fetish and interracial sex pornography as young women, is it not safe to say that the photos would have been plastered all over the MSM? I’m not sure they would be plastered all over the MSM. I think they would find their way to some internet sites. Does that reasoning make either side right?
 
Back
Top