Originally Posted By: Rim_RunnerQuote:if actually Stanley Ann Dunham (which I believe they are), have substantial historical significance. and if they aren’t what have you done?
Quote:If Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney's mothers were involved in making fetish and interracial sex pornography as young women, is it not safe to say that the photos would have been plastered all over the MSM? I’m not sure they would be plastered all over the MSM. I think they would find their way to some internet sites. Does that reasoning make either side right?
What's this? Righteous indignation when it benefits the progressive cause? Where is your defense of right vs. wrong any other time? So typically progressive.
Quote:If Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney's mothers were involved in making fetish and interracial sex pornography as young women, is it not safe to say that the photos would have been plastered all over the MSM? I’m not sure they would be plastered all over the MSM. I think they would find their way to some internet sites. Does that reasoning make either side right?
What's this? Righteous indignation when it benefits the progressive cause? Where is your defense of right vs. wrong any other time? So typically progressive.