Has anybody noticed the increase in idiotic posts by our two resident paid trolls? I assume the closer we get to the election the more money Hillary can pay to her shills. Now that she has a big time egg face with the FBI director claiming gross negligence and proving the lies told under oath to congress I guess the purse strings have been loosened for trolling. This old bag has a terrible stench following her and the general public is tired of holding it's nose.
our resident paid trolls
- Thread starter Tnslim
- Start date
azmastablasta
New member
Only extremely careless, but you can certainly trust me with my finger on the red button at 3 A.M.
jumprightinit
New member
Originally Posted By: ADKNixon was a Republican killing communists. Hillary is a communist killing Americans.
That sums it up very well.
That sums it up very well.
AzDiamondHeat
New member
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: hm1996
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
azmastablasta
New member
Maybe it's time for ole limpwoodie to put on it's big girl panties and go back to mommy's basement.
really? trump has been under federal investigation for felony offenses?
Originally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: hm1996
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
I am not defending Hillary, and it's not an excuse for her behavior, I think neither Hillary or Trump should be allowed to run. As I've said it used to be a bounced check would undo a candidate's nomination. So you will support the guy that holds a master degree in fraud, he buys a casino borrows hundreds of millions from banks, and hundreds more from investors who he promises to make the bestest most profitable casino in the world, runs up payables for another couple of hundred million, and files a bankruptcy in a year. He did not have a clue how to run a casino, but he was able to pilfer hundreds of millions toward himself personally and stiff banks, investors, and contractors for money he walked away with. I'd say he knew exactly what he was going to do from the start, because had he wanted to try to make that casino work it would have taken years to go bankrupt, because the money would have stayed in the casino coffers, not Trump's bank accounts.
I just posted pertaining to my position that elected officials should be held to the highest standards possible. Both parties should lose every single person who has been involved in any impropriety. The lines have been moved so far to the side of sleazy and immoral actions that there isn't anything that's not okay. You allow your side to have douche bags and there isn't anything can be done about the other side, except constant and incessant investigations.
You represent the party who's mantra happens to be "well look at democrats". Trump is a dirt bag pure and simple, and using what you think Hillary is as a defense for allowing a dirt bag to represent your party is exactly what you are accusing democrats of. Point that finger and you need to move out of that glass house and denounce and refuse to support your dirt bag.
And please, I asked what a caitlin is, do you have a problem defining what you perceive to be an insult? Try to use an insult and use insults that mean something, not you childish and bigoted references to who knows what but yourself.
I'm waiting for the definition of caitlin
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
I am not defending Hillary, and it's not an excuse for her behavior, I think neither Hillary or Trump should be allowed to run. As I've said it used to be a bounced check would undo a candidate's nomination. So you will support the guy that holds a master degree in fraud, he buys a casino borrows hundreds of millions from banks, and hundreds more from investors who he promises to make the bestest most profitable casino in the world, runs up payables for another couple of hundred million, and files a bankruptcy in a year. He did not have a clue how to run a casino, but he was able to pilfer hundreds of millions toward himself personally and stiff banks, investors, and contractors for money he walked away with. I'd say he knew exactly what he was going to do from the start, because had he wanted to try to make that casino work it would have taken years to go bankrupt, because the money would have stayed in the casino coffers, not Trump's bank accounts.
I just posted pertaining to my position that elected officials should be held to the highest standards possible. Both parties should lose every single person who has been involved in any impropriety. The lines have been moved so far to the side of sleazy and immoral actions that there isn't anything that's not okay. You allow your side to have douche bags and there isn't anything can be done about the other side, except constant and incessant investigations.
You represent the party who's mantra happens to be "well look at democrats". Trump is a dirt bag pure and simple, and using what you think Hillary is as a defense for allowing a dirt bag to represent your party is exactly what you are accusing democrats of. Point that finger and you need to move out of that glass house and denounce and refuse to support your dirt bag.
And please, I asked what a caitlin is, do you have a problem defining what you perceive to be an insult? Try to use an insult and use insults that mean something, not you childish and bigoted references to who knows what but yourself.
I'm waiting for the definition of caitlin
Originally Posted By: Stu Farishreally? trump has been under federal investigation for felony offenses?
I said that wrong, he has a whole lot of court proceedings coming up over fraud and his involvent with relieving people of their money or the money they are owed for services rendered. My misspeak.
I said that wrong, he has a whole lot of court proceedings coming up over fraud and his involvent with relieving people of their money or the money they are owed for services rendered. My misspeak.
AzDiamondHeat
New member
Originally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: AzDiamondHeatOriginally Posted By: woodguruOriginally Posted By: hm1996
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
I am not defending Hillary, and it's not an excuse for her behavior, I think neither Hillary or Trump should be allowed to run. As I've said it used to be a bounced check would undo a candidate's nomination. So you will support the guy that holds a master degree in fraud, he buys a casino borrows hundreds of millions from banks, and hundreds more from investors who he promises to make the bestest most profitable casino in the world, runs up payables for another couple of hundred million, and files a bankruptcy in a year. He did not have a clue how to run a casino, but he was able to pilfer hundreds of millions toward himself personally and stiff banks, investors, and contractors for money he walked away with. I'd say he knew exactly what he was going to do from the start, because had he wanted to try to make that casino work it would have taken years to go bankrupt, because the money would have stayed in the casino coffers, not Trump's bank accounts.
I just posted pertaining to my position that elected officials should be held to the highest standards possible. Both parties should lose every single person who has been involved in any impropriety. The lines have been moved so far to the side of sleazy and immoral actions that there isn't anything that's not okay. You allow your side to have douche bags and there isn't anything can be done about the other side, except constant and incessant investigations.
You represent the party who's mantra happens to be "well look at democrats". Trump is a dirt bag pure and simple, and using what you think Hillary is as a defense for allowing a dirt bag to represent your party is exactly what you are accusing democrats of. Point that finger and you need to move out of that glass house and denounce and refuse to support your dirt bag.
And please, I asked what a caitlin is, do you have a problem defining what you perceive to be an insult? Try to use an insult and use insults that mean something, not you childish and bigoted references to who knows what but yourself.
I'm waiting for the definition of caitlin
Once again you try to define the rules when the argument doesn't suit you.
Put on your big girl panties or go play somewhere else.
Your lame rhetoric is getting old. You were exposed LONG ago for the fraud you are, yet you still try in vain to pass yourself off as someone who belongs here and has something of value to contribute.
It is over caitlin. Give it up.
The sad thing here is that this is true and the same thing can be said against the other candidate as well.
Again, caitlin just can;t accept a FACT without trying to say, "well, the OTHER guy is just as bad...."
That is a HORRIBLE defense of your beliefs.
I am not defending Hillary, and it's not an excuse for her behavior, I think neither Hillary or Trump should be allowed to run. As I've said it used to be a bounced check would undo a candidate's nomination. So you will support the guy that holds a master degree in fraud, he buys a casino borrows hundreds of millions from banks, and hundreds more from investors who he promises to make the bestest most profitable casino in the world, runs up payables for another couple of hundred million, and files a bankruptcy in a year. He did not have a clue how to run a casino, but he was able to pilfer hundreds of millions toward himself personally and stiff banks, investors, and contractors for money he walked away with. I'd say he knew exactly what he was going to do from the start, because had he wanted to try to make that casino work it would have taken years to go bankrupt, because the money would have stayed in the casino coffers, not Trump's bank accounts.
I just posted pertaining to my position that elected officials should be held to the highest standards possible. Both parties should lose every single person who has been involved in any impropriety. The lines have been moved so far to the side of sleazy and immoral actions that there isn't anything that's not okay. You allow your side to have douche bags and there isn't anything can be done about the other side, except constant and incessant investigations.
You represent the party who's mantra happens to be "well look at democrats". Trump is a dirt bag pure and simple, and using what you think Hillary is as a defense for allowing a dirt bag to represent your party is exactly what you are accusing democrats of. Point that finger and you need to move out of that glass house and denounce and refuse to support your dirt bag.
And please, I asked what a caitlin is, do you have a problem defining what you perceive to be an insult? Try to use an insult and use insults that mean something, not you childish and bigoted references to who knows what but yourself.
I'm waiting for the definition of caitlin
Once again you try to define the rules when the argument doesn't suit you.
Put on your big girl panties or go play somewhere else.
Your lame rhetoric is getting old. You were exposed LONG ago for the fraud you are, yet you still try in vain to pass yourself off as someone who belongs here and has something of value to contribute.
It is over caitlin. Give it up.
jumprightinit
New member
Is there any money in being a paid troll?