AO is slower than SF, but I've seen AO be more forgiving for lash than SF. For any SF scope, you need to run your adjustments only in one direction to ensure you hit the true target setting, so if you want to go from 100 to 200yrds, you need to turn the knob all the way out, then come backwards to 200. Then coming back to 100yrds, just turn it backwards from 200 to 100 - adjustment setting approached only from the outside direction. AO's seem, to me at least, to be less sensitive to lash, and easier to fine tune for focal plane unity (no parallax) - which makes sense, larger threads, larger "knob" to turn, with better granularity along the travel... So I'd tend to say AO's are easier to set for perfect focal unity, but either can be just as accurate. Oversized SF wheels are an option to improve the focal precision of SF models - even exceeding that of AO's.
I run both, like both. Prefer SF for hunting due to the speed, prefer AO on the bench for KFD shooting for the precision focus. Can use either in reverse roles. Managing parallax even at high magnification and long ranges in fixed parallax scopes isn't difficult either, but at the same time, it's not really something someone needs to tolerate since AO and SF scopes are out there.