I need some info on a Remington 700 sps varmint .222 Remington magnum I have bought the barrel is stamped .222 Remington magnum 40'
"originally" the 222 Remington Magnum was discontinued in 1968? .... The SPS (Special Purpose Synthetic) version of the 700 wasn't introduced until the mid 2000's.
The chambering and the SPS verbiage doesn't line up unless either the rifle was rechambered . For the 1960's era Remington 700 in 222 Remington Magnum a ADL or BDL would be period "correct".
There is one other way this rifle could have come to be. Outside of a end user doing a modification to a new stock.
Like Military Arsenals' it is my understanding that it was really wasn't uncommon to have a surplus of rifles ready to be test fired. As that is when the Barrel Stamping was applied.
Once test fired they was labeled stamped and boxed then place in the supply line to distributors.
So "how could this be with a Box??? I can think that probably maybe a old barreled action was relegated to the "Achieves" section of Remington. When the bankruptcy took effect the "Archives" ( and honestly probably the correct term would be "Tool Room") was sold off, as well as the inventory.
Here is example of a non-Remington label that "some' use on a Remington box to ship the guns;
Which some buyers such as the "Gun Repair Center" in Jacksonville Fla bought a lot, PTG aka Dave Kiff bought some actually a lot) , these are Not the Only two that did this practice, just the only two that came to my mind.
Some was assembled together from remaining stockage of parts into rifles. Because of this most of what they are selling are not date coded, nor have the proof testing. One could check the SKU on the box with a internet search to validate against the Old Remington catalogs. Serial numbers in dating Remington's are hit and miss the barrel date codes are the most correct way to date the actual rifle.
So ....
Shotguns are usually dated as
Ok so now we see where the "date codes" are Supposed to be what do they mean???
The following letters correspond to the months of the year.
Example: B=January, L= February, A=March
B – L – A – C – K – P – O – W – D – E – R – X
B – Jan L – Feb A – Mar C – Apr K – May
P – Jun O – Jul W – Aug D – Sept E – Oct R – Nov X – Dec
for the years :
A – 1932 |
a – 1980 |
A – 2006 |
B – 1933 |
B – 1955 |
B – 1981 |
B – 2007 |
C – 1956 |
C – 1982 |
C – 2008 |
D – 1935 |
D – 1957 |
D – 1983 |
D – 2009 |
E – 1936 |
E – 1958 |
E – 1984 |
e – 2010 |
F – 1937 |
F – 1959 |
F – 1985 |
F – 2011 |
G – 1938 |
G – 1960 |
G – 1986 |
G – 2012 |
H – 1939 |
H – 1961 |
H – 1987 |
I – 1976 |
I – 1988 |
J – 1940 |
J – 1962 |
J – 1989 |
K – 1941 |
K – 1963 |
K – 1990 |
L – 1942 |
L – 1964 |
L – 1991 |
M – 1921 |
M – 1965 |
M – 1992 |
MM – 1943 |
N – 1922 |
N – 1966 |
N – 1993 |
NN – 1944 |
O – 1977 |
O – 1994 |
P – 1923 |
P – 1967 |
P – 1995 |
PP – 1945 |
Q – 1978 |
Q – 1996 |
R – 1924 |
R – 1968 |
R – 1997 |
RR – 1946 |
S – 1925 |
S – 1969 |
S – 1998 |
SS – 1947 |
T – 1926 |
T – 1970 |
T – 1999* |
TT – 1948 |
U – 1927 |
U – 1971 |
U – 2000* |
UU – 1949 |
V – 1979 |
V – 2001* |
W – 1928 |
W – 1972 |
W – 2002 |
WW – 1950 |
X – 1929 |
X – 1934 |
X – 1973 |
X – 2003 |
XX – 1951 |
Y – 1930 |
Y – 1974 |
Y – 2004 |
YY – 1952 |
Z – 1931 |
Z – 1954 |
z – 1975 |
z – 2005 |
ZZ – 1953 |
Notice the upper and lower case letters, But seeing how we are discussing a 700 which was introduced in 1962. The Upper A would 2006, as 1962 is after 1932 there is no way the Upper A would be correct for the year 1932. A lower cases a would be 1980.
Now all the graphics and data are copied and pasted from the Remington society dot org. So they deserve all the credit for the knowledge.
Again using search engines
I don't know if one can blow up or zoom on the image above, but the graphic is a example on a barrel with a code of Just the anchor for the final inspector, before "test" or actually "Proof firing" to get the date codes stamped.
Now the OP's may or may not fall into the category I describe above. Without pictures it would be impossible to advise the history of his firearm with any degree of certainty.
The actual part of all the hoopla and sort of "guess work" write up is based on how the Bankruptcy is effecting a lot of Remington 700's today that have "lost" their history so to speak is basically describe what is happening as history is being made.
Not that anyone actually cares about history, truth, facts. If you don't believe me talk to a Democrat
(hopefully that very last statement is as funny to the reader as it is to me)
Regards,
Mike