Samsquanch
Active member
I have no doubt that the 22-250 has a quite a bit more punch than the smaller 223. I own both of these rifles. I bought the Howa for the simple reason of it being the caliber it was. I wanted more speed and energy downrange than the 223 could deliver. In my research before buying I had found that every person who owned a Howa seemed to be thoroughly impressed with the gun. Initially I was too but comparing the two on paper the little Savage was the clear winner holding a 5 shot group within 3/4" at 100 yards whereas the Howa could only stay within a couple inches! this was off of a bench and steady rest. It boggled my mind that there was as much variance as there was in the Howa. I could live with a 2" group as that's as big of an area as I'd need to hit on a coyote. I guess my question is has anyone else encountered a similar situation where a cheaper utilitarian type of gun would outperform a "higher end" type of rifle?