See- I Told You Maryland Sucks

New York is the least overall free by a considerable margin, followed by New Jersey, Rhode Island, California, and Maryland.

yeah, yeah. Cry me a river. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

We lived in Maryland for a while, but I've been in upstate NY for most of my life. You don't know how GOOD you got it until you've lived here....
 
That's a great story, Dawg, let's us put it up on here, too, for those too lazy to hit the link:

Newsmax.com


Study: Most Liberal States Are Least Free
Wednesday, May 6, 2009 1:03 PM

By: Dave Eberhart

According to a new study released by the Mercatus Center of George Mason University, some of the most liberal U.S. states rank lowest when it comes to personal freedom.


The study, which calls itself the “first-ever comprehensive ranking of the American states on their public policies affecting individual freedoms in the economic, social, and personal spheres,” made a host of findings:



The freest states in the country are New Hampshire, Colorado, and South Dakota, which together achieve a virtual tie for first place. All three states feature low taxes and government spending -- and middling levels of regulation and paternalism.



New York is the least overall free by a considerable margin, followed by New Jersey, Rhode Island, California, and Maryland.


Unfortunately, say the report authors, these freedom-disadvantaged states “make up a substantial portion of the total American population. Moreover, these bottom five states have considerable ground to make up even to move off this ignoble list, let alone into a creditable position in the rankings.”



When weighing personal freedom alone, Alaska is the clear winner, while Maryland brings up the rear.


Sarah Palin’s Alaska does extremely well on personal freedom, conclude study authors. Reasons for its high personal freedom alone score include: fully legalized possession of small amounts of marijuana (accomplished through a court ruling), the best (least restrictive) gun laws in the country, recognition of same-sex domestic partnerships, and possibly the best homeschooling laws in the country.



As for freedom in the different regions of the country, the Mountain and West North Central regions are the freest overall -- while the Middle Atlantic lags far behind on both economic and personal freedom.


There are real benefits to scoring high on economic and personal freedoms, conclude the study’s authors. Their analysis demonstrated that states enjoying more economic and personal freedom tend to attract substantially higher rates of internal net migration.


The Problem with Being Liberal


According to the study, previous research has shown that, as of 2006, Alabama and Mississippi were the most conservative states in the country, while New York and New Jersey were the most liberal. In the index put forth by the new study, Alabama and Mississippi fall in the middle, while New York and New Jersey are at the bottom.


“The problem is that the cultural values of liberal governments seem on balance to require more regulation of individual behavior than do the cultural values of conservative governments,” say the study’s authors. “While liberal states are freer than conservative states on marijuana and same-sex partnership policies, when it comes to gun owners, home schoolers, motorists, or smokers, liberal states are nanny states, while conservative states are more tolerant.”


Some Individual State Profiles



Illinois is one of the worst states to live in from a personal freedom perspective (#49). On economic freedom it is in the middle of the pack (#29). Illinois has the fourth harshest gun control laws in the country, after California, Maryland, and New York, and the state’s victimless crimes arrest rates are almost unfathomable: In 2006, more than 2 percent of the state’s population was arrested for a victimless crime (and that figure does not count under-18s). Nearly one-third of all arrests were for victimless crimes.



Texas (#7 economic, #5 personal, #5 overall) has one of the smallest state governments in the country. As a percentage of corrected GSP, Texas has the second lowest tax burden in the country and the third lowest grants-adjusted government spending. However, government employment is a standard deviation higher than the national average. Gun control is better than average, but the state falls short on open-carry laws, stricter-than-federal minimum age for purchase rules, and dealer licensing.

Alcohol is less regulated than in most other states, and taxes are low. Low-level marijuana cultivation is a misdemeanor, but otherwise marijuana laws are very harsh.



Colorado, the #2 state, achieved its ranking through excellent fiscal numbers and above-average numbers on regulation and paternalism. The state is the most fiscally decentralized in the country, with localities raising fully 44.5 percent of all state and local expenditures. By percentage of adjusted GSP, Colorado has the third lowest tax burden in the country, surpassed only by Tennessee and Texas. It has resisted the temptation of “sin taxes,” with low rates on beer, wine, spirits, and cigarettes. On the other hand, Colorado’s smoking bans are among the most extreme in the country, with no exceptions or local option for any locations other than workplaces. Colorado is 1 of 12 states to have decriminalized low-level marijuana possession.



Oregon (#36 economic, #7 personal, #27 overall) is the freest Pacific state. Oddly, government spending is high but taxes are low, resulting in rather high state debt. Public safety and administration look particularly ripe for cutting. Gun control laws are

about average. Marijuana possession is decriminalized below a certain level, and there is medical marijuana (cultivation and sale are felonies, though). Oregon is one of the few states to refuse to authorize sobriety checkpoints. Oregon is the only state to permit physician-assisted suicide. Private and home school regulations are quite reasonable. State land use planning is far advanced. The minimum wage is the highest in the country when adjusted for average wages.



The study touts that it improves on prior attempts to score economic freedom for American states in three primary ways: (1) it includes measures of social and personal freedoms such as peaceable citizens’ rights to educate their own children, own and carry firearms, and be free from unreasonable search and seizure; (2) it includes far more variables, even on economic policies alone, than prior studies, and there are no missing data on any variable; and (3) it uses new, more accurate measurements of key variables, particularly state fiscal policies.


“We develop and justify our ratings and aggregation procedure on explicitly normative criteria, defining individual freedom as the ability to dispose of one’s own life, liberty, and justly acquired property however one sees fit, so long as one does not coercively infringe on another individual’s ability to do the same,” note the authors.
 
Here is the actual study: http://www.mercatus.org/PublicationDetails.aspx?id=26154

Table IV: Personal Freedom Ranking
State Personal Freedom
1. Alaska 0.272
2. Maine 0.193
3. New Mexico 0.138
4. Arkansas 0.125
5. Texas 0.121
6. Missouri 0.110
7. Oregon 0.104
8. Idaho 0.100
9. Virginia 0.100
10. Wyoming 0.095
11. Vermont 0.093
12. Arizona 0.089
13. New Hampshire 0.087
14. Utah 0.086
15. Kansas 0.085
16. Colorado 0.084
17. West Virginia 0.080
18. Tennessee 0.059
19. Indiana 0.049
20. Michigan 0.045
21. Montana 0.029
22. Mississippi 0.027
23. Florida 0.022
24. South Dakota 0.007
25. Iowa 0.006
26. Kentucky 0.003
27. Oklahoma -0.002
28. Hawaii -0.009
29. Pennsylvania -0.018
30. North Carolina -0.022
31. Minnesota -0.036
32. Nevada -0.045
33. North Dakota -0.047
34. Nebraska -0.055
35. Washington -0.055
36. Delaware -0.060
37. California -0.063
38. Connecticut -0.082
39. Wisconsin -0.089
40. Louisiana -0.098
41. South Carolina -0.102
42. Georgia -0.106
43. Alabama -0.107
44. Massachusetts -0.109
45. New Jersey -0.120
46. Ohio -0.124
47. Rhode Island -0.163
48. New York -0.188
49. Illinois -0.213
50. Maryland -0.294 /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif
 
I've spent a week on Maryland's eastern shore and was in upstate New York last year for four weeks. It's a crying shame that the liberal sections have ruined two perfectly beautiful states.

I'm happy to see Arkansas ranking #4, but in the back of my mind I know the rabid liberals in this state are trying to drive us down the list and not up. All I can guess is they must be imports because most of the people born and raised here have some sense. That's not saying all the imports are bad, but too many come from some urban area of another state and then want to make Arkansas as screwed up at the place they left. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
Given my state's relative liberal stance on many political issues, I'm surprised to see us so high on the personal freedoms list. Perhaps I've taken some things for granted. It's nice to be near the top of list (that's not related to drunk driving deaths).
 


What a "SHOCKER", Massachusetts is low on the pole.

But heck we given out welfare caddies, w/free insurance, repairs & AAA memberships - send us your slackasses - we'll leave a light on for them. The bulb is of course one of those PC ones-for now.

T2G
 
Quote:
Maine #2 I call BS.



Yeah! it's a shame that Maine broke for Obumo (some out there still believe it was voter fraud that caused a lot of these states to appear in the dumb camp of the Great Teleprompter Reader... their vote can't be explained through 'normal', rational reasoning... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif)
 
Like all Liberals, the morons running this state know NOTHING about economics!

Gee, let's see: Raise the taxes on millionaires and then the millionaires leave and pay them NO taxes. I'm utterly shocked. How could this be? Gosh, the Liberals who thought this up are so SMART, how could they have been wrong? Perhaps instead of reading Marx in college they should have read Adam Smith and learned a little about the "invisible hand"...

Dawg is quite correct: Maryland DOES suck!

www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.millionaire14may14,0,6465292.story

Maryland plan to tax millionaires backfires
Top earners disappearing as economy withers

By Laura Smitherman
May 14, 2009

One of Maryland's budget-balancing tactics - asking millionaires to pay more money to the state - appears to be backfiring as the number of the highest-earning taxpayers dwindles with the flagging economy.

A year ago, Maryland became one of the first states in the nation to create a higher tax bracket for millionaires as part of a broader package of maneuvers intended to help balance the state's finances and make the tax code more progressive.

But as the state comptroller's office sifts through this year's returns, it is finding that the number of Marylanders with more than $1 million in taxable income who filed by the end of April has fallen by one-third, to about 2,000. Taxes collected from those returns as of last month have declined by roughly $100 million.

Many taxpayers in that bracket likely filed an extension and won't complete their returns until October, but a trend is emerging that indicates a "substantial decline" in the number of residents and small businesses with that kind of income, Comptroller Peter Franchot wrote in a letter to Gov. Martin O'Malley and legislative leaders.

"The revenue figures are ugly," Franchot said in an interview. "Right now, we're digging through a pile of tax returns and trying to understand this."

The recession provides an obvious explanation. Capital gains have become almost nonexistent as stock markets have tanked. Corporate executives have seen their salaries slashed. And small businesses, many of whom file individual income tax returns, have seen their profits gouged by the economic downturn.

Another more debatable explanation would be that millionaires have simply fled the Free State. While some say they have heard anecdotal evidence of the wealthy packing it up, officials say there's no proof yet of such a development.

The new 6.5 percent bracket for the highest earners became effective for the 2008 tax year, and expires after 2010. The General Assembly made the tax change last year to help offset the repealof the unpopular computer services sales tax, which lawmakers passed just months earlier in a 2007 special session as part of $1.3 billion in tax increases intended to close a structural budget deficit.

At the time, fiscal analysts said the change would bring in nearly $330 million over three years. Lawmakers left untouched the next lowest bracket: 5.5 percent for those making more than $500,000.

Franchot said in his revenue report, the first to reflect this year's tax returns, that he is most concerned about a decline in individual income taxes, which dropped more than 17 percent last month compared to the year before.

If the current trajectory remains, tax collections could fall $130 million short of current projections, which could trigger the need for additional budget cuts later this year, Franchot said. The state has made hundreds of millions of spending reductions in recent months.

Millionaires are only part of that picture. According to fiscal analysts, those with taxable income of more than $1 million accounted for only 0.3 percent of all filers.

Karen Syrylo, a tax expert with the Maryland Chamber of Commerce, which lobbied against the millionaire bracket, said she has heard from colleagues who are attorneys and accountants that their clients moved out of state to avoid the new tax rate. She said that some Maryland jurisdictions boast some of the highest combined state and local income tax burdens in the country.

"Maryland is such a small state, and it is so easy to move a few miles south to Virginia or a few miles north to Pennsylvania," Syrylo said. "So there are millionaires who are no longer going to be filing Maryland tax returns."

But Franchot and other state officials insist that it's too early to determine if that has occurred and whether any exodus would even have a discernible impact on the state's overall budget.

During a fiscal crisis in the early 1990s, the General Assembly temporarily raised the tax rate to 6 percent for those with taxable incomes of more than $100,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for joint returns. The number of filers in those brackets actually increased during that time, according to the comptroller's office.

Allen Schiff, who runs an accounting firm in Towson, said that those in industries hit hard by the national downturn, such as retail and banking, are likely among those who no longer qualify to pay the millionaire tax. He added that he has several high-income earners as clients who will be paying more but have no plans to leave the state.

"When you make that type of money, another 1 percent in taxes doesn't matter," he said. "They have the attitude that it is what it is." (Who in their right mind would hire a Lefty, pro-tax accountant like this clown? I hire accountants who share my view of taxes--that way I know I have someone aggressively trying to use every legal means to keep my tax bill as low as possible. What kind of idiot hires a Democrat accountant?)



Taxing millionaires
Previous tax rate: 5.5 percent

Current tax rate: 6.25 percent

Estimated collection from millionaires: $330 million over three years

Total income tax receipts from all payers in April: $985 million

Decline from previous year: 17.4 percent
 
It's obvious those selfish millionaires refuse to do their "patriotic duty" as Joe Biden puts it and surrender their wealth. Our Politburo in Annapolis has also just raised the sales tax from 5% to 6% (a 17% increase) while nearby Delaware has NO sales tax at all. (and they wonder why we drive to Delaware for large purchases) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif They've also instituted a "flush tax" for owners of septic systems to offset the alleged environmental destruction they cause. Every time I pinch a loaf, I think of Comrade O' Malley in the Governor's mansion.
 
Javafour, It sounds like Atlas is truly starting to shrug, huh?

Don't feel bad, We've been bleeding tax paying citizens for years up here. Eventually the vampire will run out of victims and be forced to turn on their own. Hopefully by then I'll be in Montana, Texas, or some other state that has some common sense.
 
Quote:
Javafour, It sounds like Atlas is truly starting to shrug, huh?

Don't feel bad, We've been bleeding tax paying citizens for years up here. Eventually the vampire will run out of victims and be forced to turn on their own. Hopefully by then I'll be in Montana, Texas, or some other state that has some common sense.



Well if you're looking for tax relief stay the [beeep] out of Nebraska...or make sure you don't own any property..... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/angry-smiley-055.gif
 
Back
Top