Shemales Are Oppressed

azmastablasta

New member
How dare women who have a vagina claim to be women, they are now starting to eat their own...


Transgender People Are Now Oppressed Because ‘Pus sy Hats’ ‘Equate Womanhood With Having A Vagina’

ERIC OWENS 9:56 AM 03/29/2017

Men who dress up in women’s clothing and insist they are women are unfairly ostracized from the modern American feminist movement because feminists are overly “reproductive system-focused,” according to an op-ed in the Daily Emerald, the University of Oregon’s student newspaper.

The author of the 790-word jeremiad, Taylor Griggs, trains her invective on “‘free the nipple’ campaigns” and, especially, the perky, neon-pink-yarn “pus sy power hats” with which many participants in the January Women’s March on Washington festooned themselves.

Griggs quotes Marie Solis in Mic for the proposition that signs at the Women’s March reading “Pus sy power” and “Pus sy grabs back” deliver “a clear and oppressive message to trans women.” That oppressive message is: “having a vagina is essential to womanhood.”

Solis goes on to quote a transgender woman who was offended by feminists holding “signs that equate womanhood with having a vagina” — and even more offended by a subset of feminists who point out that “trans women are actually men in disguise trying to infiltrate their spaces.”

Meanwhile, Griggs, the University of Oregon op-ed writer, asserts that “it’s essential to make sure that transgender women are included in definitions of womanhood.”

Griggs also blames President Donald Trump because, she says, “some of this genitalia-centered rhetoric is a direct backlash to President Trump’s attacks on the female reproductive system.”

She goes on to insist that “transgender women certainly should not be left out of any definition of womanhood.”

Also, America’s feminist movement must not forget the plight of women who dress up in men’s clothing and tell everyone they are men. Some transgender men “have vaginas and uteri that cause significant psychological pain for them that is rarely addressed,” Griggs laments.

Griggs briefly discusses “intersectionality” and then asserts that “black women do not have the privilege to take back their sexuality the same way that white women do.”

Finally, at last, she closes with a plea to feminists “to advocate for the rights of people with vaginas and uteri” and “to show up at Black Lives Matter rallies.”

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/29/transgender-people-are-now-oppressed-because-[beeep]-hats-equate-womanhood-with-having-a-vagina/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
 
The whole thing is confusing to me.

I'm a guy. If I cut off my hand, I'm a guy with 1 hand. Cut off an arm, I'm the 1 armed man. Take a leg, I'm the guy with 1 leg. Pretty much cut off any part of me, and I'm the guy missing whatever.

But if I put on a dress, I'm a woman. Going for transitive properties here, dress on my dog, He's now a woman. Dress on my car, woman. And I'm guessing that all the hangers in my wife's closet are all women. Clothing is magical.

Ok, so the other side what is a woman wearing pants? A guy now I guess. If I'm out and see an attractive woman, who is wearing pants, is that now a guy and did I just become gay? Or do I now have to go put on a dress since if she's not gay, we need a woman in the relationship? And if while I'm wearing the dress and see an attractive woman in a dress, am I now a lesbian?

Once we're both totally naked and all the magical clothing has been removed, are we now genderless? Who's on top? Do we play rock paper scissors to see who puts the pants back on so we finally have guy involved in the otherwise confusing moment of sexuality?

If I put on several different outfits at once and pleasure myself, did I just have group sex? Should I brag on facebook? Can I now drive in the carpool lane?

It's all just so much more involved than before clothing became magic.
 
And that right there NIndy is why it's a mental issue. Good humor though..hahaa

It's a case of if you are guy dressed as a woman you are not a tranny your a drag queen, which can prefer either or both sexes.

Then if you are dressed as a woman, and "believe" you are woman, you are now a tranny, to which you could also prefer a man, woman, or both as a partner. (really a brain twister to be a tranny that prefers a woman as a then a Lesbian)


In my role in my current job, i am forced to attend these "awareness classes" where they talk about it..

The funny thing is that the "woman" teaching this was John Voight's ugly doppel ganger only with long hair, bad makeup and looking something like Mrs. Doubtfire.

I really twisted their brains when i asked, "Are we supposed to talk about Sex, or Sexual preferences in the workplace? I thought that we were not supposed to talk about sex, in any way at work with coworkers to prevent the appearance or misunderstanding from two people talking and one getting offended or even so that someone that is listening and can hear the conversation getting offended"

They had no response. lol
 
hahah.. I did think that too. But to be perfectly honest.. I am already a VP at a Bank and have reached the point in my career that i find myself wishing to talk to you guys than deal with morons that can't seem to just do their job right.

I stare out the window and realize that I am happy at the level and income i make and don't care to move up anymore. I would rather focus on my passions (wife, kids, hobbies) To which i am trying to learn and discuss as much as possible with all of you. I find that sharing and discussing these topics here on this site with the people here is far more interesting, inspiring, and educational than anything else. I have found that most of you here are far more interesting and all have something interesting and inspirational than any of the fruit loops and Tranny's or board rooms out there.

I appreciate the conversation, sharing, and debate. I don't get mad at the insults i get, and try thoughtfully to read and understand what each post is saying and what the meaning or conditions are that brought you to your comments.
 
Quote: trains her invective on “‘free the nipple’ campaigns” and, especially, the perky, neon-pink-yarn “pus sy power hats” with which many participants in the January Women’s March on Washington festooned themselves.

Can someone translate this for me? What does it mean.

tongue_smilie.gif
And what does this mean;



lol.gif
 
Umm, I'd love to help Jeremy but I can stumble through English, speak enough messican to get by in country if they slow down a bit, oh yeah, I also speak passable pig latin, but I never had a desire to learn to speak "Dork."
 
You know, I would say, "Why does the media even bother giving these psychos their moment of glory?" But yes we do need to be aware this movement is out there, so that we do ALL become very very tired of their B_S_ and tell them all to go seek counseling, they are not normal.

Quote:Men who dress up in women’s clothing and insist they are women are unfairly ostracized from the modern American feminist movement because feminists are overly “reproductive system-focused,” according to an op-ed in the Daily Emerald, the University of Oregon’s student newspaper.


The reason men who dress up in women's clothing and insist they are women are ostracized in the American feminist movement is, they aren't women. And, there is nothing unfair about that! And, pretending they are, and there is, doesn't change the fact they aren't, and there isn't, it only serves to allow them to control your thoughts, and bring you down to their F'ed up levels of immorality and mental instability.



Quote:Meanwhile, Griggs, the University of Oregon op-ed writer, asserts that “it’s essential to make sure that transgender women are included in definitions of womanhood.”

Why would transgender women be included in the definition of womanhood? If we did that, the perverts wouldn't have anything to aspire to be, and it would only serve to confuse them worse than they already are. They couldn't believe themselves women anymore, because women don't really exist, women are nothing more than the way you feel when you get up in the morning.

Beyond that... Griggs is one seriously sick puppy, and is obviously in need of psychiatric help!



 

So, for the argument of "equality", lets just get rid of ALL designations. Everyone is EQUAL. You are now just "PERSON".

Now they will have NOTHING to complain about.

Oh wait, except now they would be accountable for their actions and not treated SPECIAL.

and THAT is what THEY want. THEY don't want "equality". THEY want "SPECIAL".
 
Originally Posted By: hunter243sgkWhat i have never figured out is, when a man is transgender is he gay or a lesibian in disguise!!

haha..

tranny is their mindset and if they feel they are a woman, attracted to a man it's not Gay, but if they like woman (the most mind boggling) they are then a lesbian based on the identified Gender.
 
Originally Posted By: Lazerus
So, for the argument of "equality", lets just get rid of ALL designations. Everyone is EQUAL. You are now just "PERSON".

Now they will have NOTHING to complain about.

Oh wait, except now they would be accountable for their actions and not treated SPECIAL.

and THAT is what THEY want. THEY don't want "equality". THEY want "SPECIAL".



Yep, that is the dirty little honest truth..

It's all based on title 9, and the civil rights act where all have to be treated equally and non-discrimination, yet the amendment is the catch. It's specific to the protected class.. If everyone is a "person" then they can't get preferential treatment. Which is really what it's about.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top