Sightmark vs. Redfield Revolution

[Kydogduster]

I have a Nikon Prostaff 3x9x40 on a Stag flat top. I use this on coyotes. The scope is good but I have not been happy shooting with glasses on. Should have bought the Buckmaster. Most hunting is done in brushy areas. I have been think about a 2x7. a friend recommended Sightmark and I have read a lot about the new Redfield Revolution. Any suggestions? I like the looks of the Sightmark 1x5. Not sure about the tactical turrets. Is it possible to accidently knock the turrets out of adjustment? The Redfield sounds like a good scope, but I have never seen one up close and personal.

 

[stealthman]

I don't have any experience with the Sightmark, but I do own a Redfield Revolution and can say that they are a very nice, clear scope for the money. I would definitely buy another one. Clarity is up there with my Nikon Monarchs.

 

[Don Fischer]

Another no experience with the Sightmark. But I have a 2-7x Redfield Revolution and two more are in the planning!

 

[koh]

I have a new Redfield and just ordered two more for my son's rifles. For the money they are a very good scope with a great warranty. The glass on the Redfield is just as good if not better then my Nikons and Burris scopes.
I will defintely be using more of them on my own rifles in the future.
Sightmark does get some good reviews but you have to wonder about a scope that is supposed to perform like a high end optic at a bargain price level. I would be skeptical to say the least.