Repeatability is nice. Essential in a long range tactical rig. Don't think it matters much at all in a hunting rifle for 99% of us.
Mostly, we set the zero where we want it, and so long as it stays there, forget about it.
My 44 mags are certainly not as precise in adjustment or repeatability as a high end scope is, but then, they only cost about $100. They're good enough for most hunting applications. When I move one 4 clicks, it moves close enough to an inch at 100 yards to not matter.
I've taken 44 mags off of rifles and replaced them with Leupold Vari X II's of comparable power range. Groups are the same size off the bench, can't say that I can hunt any earlier or later.
I'm not fond of the cheaper Simmons lines. Seen too many fail other people. Never owned an AETEC, can't say from first hand observations. But the 44 mag series, for the money, is a decent scope. Using them has contributed to the demise of many, many critters.
The Swifts may be better, dunno. Never seen one. May have to buy one sometime just to check it out.
For a lot of people, the use will limit what the budget will truly stand. A scope on a calling rifle is hardly a life-or-death, bust the bank worthy purchase. For a rifle that's headed to an expensive hunt, far from home, where failure means a ruined hunt, that's a different deal. So is serious competitve shooting.
But really, for most of us, hunting our home turf, we can actually hunt just fine with a lesser scope and never tell the difference.
I for one would rather be able to hunt with an affordable and useful scope, than sit at home staring longingly at a new rifle that I can't even shoot, just because I can't yet afford the best glass to put on it. I'll scope a rifle with the best I can afford and use it. That still leaves me the enjoyment of the upgrade at a later date, usually when hunting seasons are closed and I'm not impacted, and I can afford to treat myself to a better scope.