So... Is it the sound or the caller

I have original 16bit 32kHz files from older "Programmable" WT units. You can compare originals to the output of the new WT if you wanted, you just have to get ahold of the sounds. Older "programmable" WT's come up for sale once in awhile and I'll probably be selling one in the near future as I've stated in the classifieds in response to somebody searching for one.
 
If you are going to analyze the output from the amplifier, leave the speaker hooked up and run "scabbed in" leads to the PC. The input impedance of the capture circuit will be so high in relation to the speaker, it won't have any effect.
To be really scientific about it, you could use a sound file that has 100Hz., 5kHz., 10kHz. and 15kHz. sine waves. That would really tell you something.
Music is much harder to analyze, but there are software packages that could do it. You would need a good quality microphone, if you went that route, instead of the direct conncection.

The Fourier package on this site might, but I haven't tried it myself:


Free software
 
Quote:
Fox pro, Mike
No offence but carity is just that, if it wont play a song with clarity it wont play an animal recording with clairity. When you do your comparison you need the same thing playing on all or it wont be fair. If it will play a song clearly then it will have no problem playing a animal sound. I am in no way biased and if the FoxPro comes out to be the clearest i will tell and show everyone i can. but if it is not i will tell everyone wich one is.
I think FoxPro makes a good product but i am just trying to figure out wich one is best.

in:
remote responce, distance, obstructed, ETC.
clarity
loudness
eas of use
sounds availible number and quality
durability
batteries
price
ETC.

Does it matter whoes is the clearest, loudest, ETC? most of this will not effect you calling coyotes but we all want to get the most for our money. and it cant hurt if they cost the same.



I couldnt agree more! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif
 
Back
Top