Originally Posted By: ramshotJust my opionion.
I used a suppressed 22-250 In New Zealand while I lived there for a few deer hunts.
Needless to say I wasn't impressed.
If It was me, why not actually use a Sub-Sonic load if your going to go thru all that trouble of paper work, money, ect, ect ?
The rifle will still be loud if you don't use the sub sonic round, and I cant see the benifits if your not going to use a sub sonic round, so why bother ?
your pointing 180 degrees in the wrong direction... you do NOT need to be running subs to suppress the muzzle blast of a weapon effectively... I've been running a suppressed 250 for years, and its by far the best suppressed weapon I've ran, and I've ran a few, from the 22LR to the Barret .416. You will not only see, but more importantly HEAR the benefits of suppressing the 22-250 when hunting, and not having your or your partners ears ring, I've taken over 15 dogs this year with my camera man 6ft or closer to my muzzle...
Originally Posted By: ramshotAny one want to explain ?
would you like me to explain how bad his ears would be hemorrhaging and bleeding without a can on the end of my weapon?