The Savage Axis .308 Fails -- Final Solution

Sgt_Mike

Well-known member
Like I have stated in the past the history of a gentleman trading this Axis (.308Win) in stating the gun hardly stays on target. Fast forward several years maybe a decade.
I finally dusted it off, mounted a scope and did some standard .308 Win 150gr FMJ "service" rifle loads (IMR-4895 43.5grs). Choosing today to find out the real status of this rifle.
Yep the Gentleman was correct while the rounds count is way low, as in less than 3 boxes (60 rounds max) fired through it (even counting the 20 rounds I did today).
It indeed is off. It is most definitely a bad barrel.
Consistent 5" 5-round groups, notice plural.

Now that it is actually proven to be a crappy barrel, the barrel need to go. Be cut up and used to make muzzle brakes or something useful.
The multi million dollar question is caliber, do I stay with the .308 Win, or go with something like a slow twist 22 BR (which was my actual original plan for this action) ?

Option 1 - stay with the 308
a. Takeoff's while affordable do pose problems sometimes, and is a roll of the dice in quality. No guarantees that I wind up with as bad, if not worse than I currently have . However I do have two known quality barrels both are chambered in 308 Win.
One is a 26" Remington 700 (date code "we" = Aug, 2010, 25 rounds down the tube) Varmint contour, unsure of the twist until I measure it.
The other a Bergara B-14 Remington 700 clone 20" heavy threaded 1-10" IIRC , but will check twist if I use it, slightly more rounds count 60 IIRC. Which both are heavy enough that a rethread could be done to the Savage small shank.

b. order new pre-fit barrel for the savage axis.

Option 2 - go with the original plan of the 22 BR which I've been keeping a eye on a vendor in Oklahoma to provide the barrel.

The only reason that I had even entertained the idea of leaving as be, was as a loaner rifle for one of the daughter's friend. But in the end it is my rifle until I pass it on.
Which honestly is my choice what to do.

Several observations for today
I had completely forgotten how much a 6 lb .308 rifle recoils, wasn't really that bad just a "gentle" reminder why I like the little bit heavier rifles. The way she bucks yeah there is no follow through or looking for a trance unless a spotter catches it. Still waiting on a LGS to get the MDT Field Stock in for me, I'm sure that would tame it a bit, the factory stock is really lacking although some say the Axis II stocks are a improvement.

The performance was so bad I had even doubted my own abilities thinking I was having a bad day. So put the Rem 700 PCR on the bench, did several 10-shot groups measuring 3/4 of a inch.
Tried some IMR-4895 loads with the 6.5mm 100gr Sierra Varminter, which did Extremely well without any load development in that powder, although I did set them out a little further to 2.656" COAL. Then shifted to the 120gr load with IMR-4350 again just stacking them in a cluster. So yeah wasn't me, the scope used is a known good quality. The load is a known performer in lots of rifles in the past so yeah.
 
You should really like the MDT Field stock, not expensive but a great improvement. As for barrels, I'm a fan boy of the 308, so that's easy for me. UrbanRifleman over on 6BR/Accurate Shooter is out of Tulsa and uses Wilson barrels with really good reviews. I think he has a website under the same name. Good prices to.
 
@William Suter
Yes sir, that is the Gentleman that I was referencing for the prefit barrels (from OK). When I spoke to him on the 22BR he had exactly what I was looking for.
I personally like the .308 but I just might enjoy the 22 BR cartridge more IDK just pondering it. which isn't far from a 22-250 in the performance field.
Both have the spot in my safe anytime, although this would be my first 22 BR if I go that route.

I do have a 722 Rem that "could" use a newer barrel although hate to give up the .244 Rem / 6mm Rem cartridge in that one but would be a easy button.
 
Last edited:
Like I have stated in the past the history of a gentleman trading this Axis (.308Win) in stating the gun hardly stays on target. Fast forward several years maybe a decade.
I finally dusted it off, mounted a scope and did some standard .308 Win 150gr FMJ "service" rifle loads (IMR-4895 43.5grs). Choosing today to find out the real status of this rifle.
Yep the Gentleman was correct while the rounds count is way low, as in less than 3 boxes (60 rounds max) fired through it (even counting the 20 rounds I did today).
It indeed is off. It is most definitely a bad barrel.
Consistent 5" 5-round groups, notice plural.

Now that it is actually proven to be a crappy barrel, the barrel need to go. Be cut up and used to make muzzle brakes or something useful.
The multi million dollar question is caliber, do I stay with the .308 Win, or go with something like a slow twist 22 BR (which was my actual original plan for this action) ?

Option 1 - stay with the 308
a. Takeoff's while affordable do pose problems sometimes, and is a roll of the dice in quality. No guarantees that I wind up with as bad, if not worse than I currently have . However I do have two known quality barrels both are chambered in 308 Win.
One is a 26" Remington 700 (date code "we" = Aug, 2010, 25 rounds down the tube) Varmint contour, unsure of the twist until I measure it.
The other a Bergara B-14 Remington 700 clone 20" heavy threaded 1-10" IIRC , but will check twist if I use it, slightly more rounds count 60 IIRC. Which both are heavy enough that a rethread could be done to the Savage small shank.

b. order new pre-fit barrel for the savage axis.

Option 2 - go with the original plan of the 22 BR which I've been keeping a eye on a vendor in Oklahoma to provide the barrel.

The only reason that I had even entertained the idea of leaving as be, was as a loaner rifle for one of the daughter's friend. But in the end it is my rifle until I pass it on.
Which honestly is my choice what to do.

Several observations for today
I had completely forgotten how much a 6 lb .308 rifle recoils, wasn't really that bad just a "gentle" reminder why I like the little bit heavier rifles. The way she bucks yeah there is no follow through or looking for a trance unless a spotter catches it. Still waiting on a LGS to get the MDT Field Stock in for me, I'm sure that would tame it a bit, the factory stock is really lacking although some say the Axis II stocks are a improvement.

The performance was so bad I had even doubted my own abilities thinking I was having a bad day. So put the Rem 700 PCR on the bench, did several 10-shot groups measuring 3/4 of a inch.
Tried some IMR-4895 loads with the 6.5mm 100gr Sierra Varminter, which did Extremely well without any load development in that powder, although I did set them out a little further to 2.656" COAL. Then shifted to the 120gr load with IMR-4350 again just stacking them in a cluster. So yeah wasn't me, the scope used is a known good quality. The load is a known performer in lots of rifles in the past so yeah.
Did you check anything else to be sure it is a bad barrel? Did you use the same scope the other guy used or did you use a known good scope? Savage is well known for the front scope base screw being too long and bottoming out on the barrel threads before the base is secure. Did you check the action screws? They can also be too. long and bottom out while the action has room to move about in the stock.
 
You should chamber cast it first before tossing the barrel. I wonder if they cut the chamber wrong. Brass didnt split or come out funky shaped?
 
Did you check anything else to be sure it is a bad barrel? Did you use the same scope the other guy used or did you use a known good scope? Savage is well known for the front scope base screw being too long and bottoming out on the barrel threads before the base is secure. Did you check the action screws? They can also be too. long and bottom out while the action has room to move about in the stock.
No sir, used my own Leupold 6-18x 40, with new Leupold two piece STD bases, and rings, all torqued to include the windage screws. I've had the barreled action out of the stock several times, and torqued the action screws to 65 inch pounds. I've went through the action and stock several time before firing to see if something was just not done correctly, didn't note anything.

You should chamber cast it first before tossing the barrel. I wonder if they cut the chamber wrong. Brass didnt split or come out funky shaped?
Brass didn't look funny or split. I did not run calipers on the fired brass. On visual inspection nothing looked out of line.

What does the crown look like is it damaged.
Crown looks in really good shape the Gentleman that I obtained it from like I mentioned had just picked it up new in the box (from another dealer). Fired it and brought it in. We traded, I moved his scope bases etc to the new savage he got in the trade. I paid the store I was working for at the time for the amount I offered him, and put it in my safe, as a naked gun.
I wouldn't use FMJ bullets to decide if the barrel is any good.
The load I used was 150 FMJ Sierra, loaded with IMR-4895 @43.5grs, WLR primer, which is pretty much a old Mexican match load. If I had a old box of Federal GM I would have used it. But I didn't go out and buy just FMJ loaded rounds. I would have accepted a 2 or even 3 MOA groups and chalked it up to the rifle didn't like the load. But 5" at 100 for 4, 5-shot groups consistent. This same exact load has never produced more than 1.5 MOA for any rifle I've ever owned in .308 Win over the years. Normally I would agree with you.

Option 2 - go with the original plan of the 22 BR
Before the daughter mentioned her friend going hunting with her, I was going to pull the barrel, re-caliber to 22BR with a pre-fit, sit it in a MDT Field stock without even firing it. I had settled on the bases and rings that I purchased for the changeover, I just ordered them earlier than I had planned to see just how bad this is, or if it wasn't.

If I just HAD to have a loaner for her friend, based on that, I do have two known good barrels for the Remington 700 series. I could use the old Remington 722 action that I have in 6mm Rem that is on it's last legs, although that is another caliber that I really like. But like all barrels eventually they need replacement.
The Remington Varmint barrel 26" that I mentioned in the opening post should be a 1-12" twist which would work with the 5R rifling it has. For me personally, while I would prefer not to go that route would not hurt my feeling too much. Just means a little stock work opening up the barrel channel for the varmint contour. And a quick threading of the muzzle.
Then there is the option of just finding another rifle for the loaner.... 😇 which honestly is just as cost effective as putting in a new barrel. The most cost effective is telling her friend she is on her own to get a rifle to use.
 
I failed to thank everyone for their helpful comments.
Don't take my responses as dismissive to your replies, most likely someone is close to the answer why the ole girl isn't performing.

And to be honest I really didn't want to put in much work into finding out why. As the funds and time that are involved in finding out the answer could would eat into the cost of just changing the barrel.

I have considered just breaking the nut loose, loosen the barrel and then re-headspacing then give it another try. Especially after ya'll comments.
As I type this the thought of the manner in which the Axis action design engages with the barrel lug to action crosses my mind. As well as a thousand other things such as, even though rare the crown could be just simply be a bigger diameter than the rest of the bore. Not from shooting as from erosion, but nevertheless bigger, without running pin gauges one would not detect. Improper use of a bore sight collimator arbor comes to mind from when the first owner had a scope installed Maybe???
(yes I'm slowly talking myself into diagnosing the issue)

I could have the barrel pulled shortened a bit, recrowned, threaded then headspaced for about the money as just headspacing. (which I was holding off on threading to see it if it shot okay, which was minute of deer 2ish moa).

Before shooting the rifle I had thought about doing that but then thought why spend that amount of money, only to have to re-install a fresh barrel. But re-evaluating that thought. It is a gamble, that might save some funds. Or be flushing it down the tube
Which honestly would / could solve three things, crown, headspacing, barrel lug engagement. Plus it will allow me to look at the stock again for imperfections I may have missed.

Now to clean the ole girls' barrel, and break her down again in prep for the lathe work.
I'm thinking 1/2 to 1" crown set back should provide a clean proper sized crown. That maybe aggressive... then again not.

@JHB51 @BBK @derbyacresbob @lhitchcox
So Thank you Gentlemen for your responses and time.
Respectfully
Mike
 
After writing the post above, pulled the action out removed the scope / bases .... Off to the gunsmith I went. Discuss it with Geno, he checked the headspace was within limits, looking via his borescope he was like your right this is actually almost a new gun though normal rough Savage tool marks not bad yet... he reversed to the muzzle end his remarks was like "Holy mother of God" ... Mike he said " I don't know what someone forced down the muzzle but it long and bad" my response was how long? Oh a good 4" , I responded add a inch for safety and cut the ***** out, thread it for a suppressor /muzzle brake. Pointing at the Silencerco ASR 3- port muzzle brake / QD device. He did some quick measurements yeah little thin for the shoulder, but I can put a booster in and establish a good shoulder. I nodded yes, and said do it.
In the lathe it went .... only because everyone kept coming in, 3 hrs later out of the lathe it comes. Some careful inspection by him and I we concluded this will probably bring her to minute of deer capable... After that, we chit chatted after I payed him a few dollars for his efforts.
Now a lot shorter (17ish inches, original barrel length 22"), but without massive scarring in the lands and grooves. I picked up the cut out section and eyeballed it yeah it was bad, real bad. As I write this it is now assembled torqued, scope and bases on, the brake is indexed and shimmed. The idea I had about possible arbor from boresight , could have been the Old Gent cleaning from the muzzle, or even just piss poor quality control. Now to see how she does now.

Now to assemble some loads and back to range for a test. On the way back I did what I normally never do I picked up some Hornady bullets for it (110gr Vmax) no experience with the load for that bullet. So if someone has decent data I'm all ears. But I will check the Hornady site to see what they have for data in between someone posting and my research (also look over old post on here for others experience with that bullet).
I was thinking H335 @ 51.0 grs with a COAL of 2.740" should do ok, for spit balling a load.
 
Last edited:
No first hand help on the110s. I did load up 5 from your recipe (308 Win 150gr FMJ "service" rifle loads (IMR-4895 43.5grs) to try out in my POF-rouge. Probably not the same exact projo but we'll see what it does.
 
I got pretty good results w/H4895 with 110 Varmageddons (3010 fps) and 125 gr NBT's, Mike. The 110 load was 47.9gr, don't recall the load for 125 gr. but it was on the hot side IIRC.
 
@crapshoot
On the Service rifle loads I'm using Sierra #2115 seated to canaulure (@ mag Length) the load was based on a M24 SWS (Rem 700 LA), so it is at the upper side of what the old wisdom was for Service Rifle loads. In a AR-10 platform it should be a pussycat, runs really well in the M-14 (rapids, not slow fire different load there, run hotter and heavier).

Normally I'll start at 42.5grs in the IMR4895 and find joy somewhere between 42.5 to 44.8grs at mag length (147-150gr FMJ, actually can use pretty much anything the same weight class).
The M24 SWS that I had, I let a guy talk me out of. It was done at Benning using the Rem 700 LA, and then I had to source the parts on the commercial market to match the exact spec's for the system. One of the best shooting .308 I've owned. And dummy me let it go... derrp.

If the load doesn't shoot drop 0.3grs at a time and you will find the node, which should produce a solid 5 shot MOA, to slightly under consistently.
The load is actually safe (geared to the M-14's gas system, and shooting the rapid strings, max is something like 46-47grs depending on bullet brand), now with the 24 SWS it's best load was little over a grain over max of IMR4350, JLK 175's at 0.005" off touching the lands.


@hm1996
I'll note that on the 110's, I would have used the Varmageddons, but none was on the shelf locally. So I picked up the Hornady Vmax's to try.
I did go to the H335 @ 51.5grs set the coal at 2.740" according to Hodgdon that should be (is) exactly 1 gr off max (did 20).
I just got done loading those, then checked here and seen your post or I would have duplicated your load to see where it is at.
47.9grs IMR H4895 should be singing pretty good with a 110gr.
The 125grs is actually what intrigues me for deer and hog level, I was thinking the Speer TnT, but haven't settled on brand.

Only thing left for maybe shooting it tomorrow (weather) is slightly hitting one area of the bore with JB-paste, Geno said he noticed a little copper about halfway down the bore. Nothing major just starting to collect a bit, so I'll attempt to stave that off with JB, If she does start to try to collect copper there is Sweet's on the cleaning bench LOL
 
Last edited:
47.9grs IMR H4895 should be singing pretty good with a 110gr.
The 125grs is actually what intrigues me for deer and hog level, I was thinking the Speer TnT, but haven't settled on brand.
Yes, the 110 is moving right along @3010 MV but shows no signs of pressure. It is about the only thing I could get to shoot close to MOA in my BAR. It managed a few MOA groups (5 shot) but I'd say it is a true 1.25 MOA rifle; usually puts 3-4 in a clump but has one out. Tried 125's, 150's, 168's and none of those shot as well.
The 125 NBT load is for a Savage Scout that was very finicky, as well. Tried all bullet weights above and it liked the 125's best at close to max loads. Shot coyotes w/both bullets and the VG gets a bit messy sometimes.
 
Guess what day it is ....
RANGE DAY !!!!!!!!!!!

1760914209777.jpeg

Left is the Savage Axis in 308
On the Right is the Remington 700 in 6.5 Needsmoor
26" barrel with the Can on.

So how did the Savage Axis .308 do after removal of damaged barrel section?
Wellllllll...
1760914403799.jpeg

This 3-shot above was from the 75 yard line using Factory Winchester 150gr Power Point . This one group was after dialing in the windage screws on the Leupold STD bases.
Hence the tape cover the three bullet holes when I was adjusting the rounds on the windage
Moved to the 100 Yard Line here on out I keep the targets there.... Fired a group of 5 with the Factory 150gr Power point, Fired two more groups.. consistent results.

1760914632681.jpeg

A metric Ton of better after the removal of the damaged section of barrel.

I did shoot some of the 150gr FMJ loads I mentioned in the original post shot a solid 1 -1/2 MOA for three consecutive, with 1 of the 3 holding 1 -1/4 MOA

Now to play with the 110 Vmax's and H335 51.5gr COAL 2.740" @hm1996 should find this one interesting

1760914790060.jpeg

The above groups was shot Suppressed,
Unsuppressed was about 1/8" maybe 1/4"ish larger ( eyeball didn't really measure), but shows signs she is going to work with the 110grs.

Now this is not making excuses but When the smith Geno had the bore on centers (indicated with a range rod) the profile of the barrel wasn't centered to the bore.
Which he did get it down a bit more concentric, but is still off, couple that with a pencil barrel profile yeah the harmonics on this one will be a bear.
Which kind of explains the groups with the suppressor on, doing better.

If this (Savage Axis) was to be used for something other than a loaner / short range Hog / whitetail gun.... This barrel would not stay on.
However with the refocused plan of loaner.
I think I can work up loads that will work a bit better.
The key thing with everything working against it, now short barrel length (for Velocity loss but the plus of it did stiffen the barrel), vicious muzzle blast, bucking light weight, poor ergonomics of the stock, no accu-trigger (heavy and not pleasant).

One shooter to the left of my bench come over and was like what the HECK is that Blasting shockwave beast... I replied .308 Win, we held a conversation about it's ills and what I was doing. Which I told him I could tame it down a bit ... pulled out the Omega 300 with brake on it.. He was like OMG WOW.. that is way more quieter and pleasant. I asked him if he wanted to try it .. and when he did he was amazed... I noticed he had a Ruger American asked him the caliber 7.62x39 was his reply I asked him if he wanted to shoot it (his rifle) suppressed. The response was positive, I reached in the case pulled out another 30 caliber can screwed it on his. Again amazement, his father was amazed, I then explained the laws and the passage of the BBB, removing the tax stamp. I suspect he will be at the LGS attempting to get one soon.

To sum it up just a budget rifle. It at the very least stayed really consistent with the groups didn't vary like one would expect with all the flaws.
Prior to everyone's input honestly I was ready to have the barrel ground up to a pile of metal shavings.
But the responses, did cause me to actually attempt to salvage this and was a good bit less $$ wise, than a recaliber / new barrel.
So thank you Gentlemen.
For refinements the new MDT field Stock will go on, I might play with the trigger, or look for a accu-trigger. Those two item should have massive improvements.

1760921653815.png


Respectfully
Mike
 
Back
Top