Originally Posted By: Winny FanI don't think that the statement that Tikkas were made with cutting costs as part of the equation will be a revelation to too many people. That is why they run quite a bit behind a regular Sako in price.
On the other hand, they are a very competitive lower priced rifle that generally perform very well against their price-comparable competition in the market. For some young hunters on a budget they are a very good purchase.
I own several Tikka rifles that get a lot of hard use down country. I didn't buy them to admire their aesthetic beauty. They spend their entire life in either an open topped Jeep or on a 4-wheeler in some fairly rough country. When I use one, it always does exactly what I expect it to do which is to hit what it is pointed at. For my money that is all I want or expect it to do. And all of them have been filling this role for quite a few years, so they show their age on the outside, but they still function and perform like they were new.
Well beat My Brow with a brick! I never thought that Winny and I would see things the same way on most subject matters, but in this case I feel the same way. I Had an SPS Remmi that wouldnt hold a candle against My Tikka. Apples to apples, its hard to beat a Tikka IMO. I Camoed it about a day after I got it sighted in, Beauty was not what I was looking for, I wanted something accurate to shoot with, and without having to buy costly upgrades for a rifle of similar cost.. The Tikka filled the bill in My case. Light weight, accurate, adjustable trigger, thats what I wanted and thats what I got. Good luck with whatever you choose.