Originally Posted By: Bernie P.Originally Posted By: RePeteAnd the question remains even though it was asked several times.
Have you Bernie, ever owned, shot, or more importantly, harvested any fur with a 17cal?
If you had, you'd know that they really are over-achievers regardless of what the college-boys say.
No to all.That out of the way I would never buy one.It's true there has been many improvements in powders,rifling and such but that applies to all the other cal's available as well does it not.I've read enough about the .17 Rem to know it's a great little killer with minimal pelt damage but I would MUCH rather have say a .204 Ruger or any of the larger varmint rounds.Bullet choice alone make them far more versatile regardless if you load or are limited to factory ammo.
Probably should have simply stopped at admitting that you shared your sage advice on the 17Rem based on zero actual experience with it, but since you didn't, please share the actual information I'm sure you researched thoroughly regarding bullet choices for 204 vs 17 cals. Loaded ammo, yea, but 204 bullet selection for reloaders isn't any better.
Sometimes when you find yourself in a hole Bernie, the best thing to do is stop digging.