Washington Monument

azmastablasta

New member
Washington Monument

One detail that is never mentioned is that in Washington, D.C. there can never be a building of greater height than the Washington Monument.

With all the uproar about removing the ten commandments, etc., this is worth a moment or two of your time. I was not aware of this amazing historical information.

On the aluminum cap, atop the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., are displayed two words: Laus Deo.

No one can see these words. In fact, most visitors to the monument are totally unaware they are even there and for that matter, probably couldn't care less.

Once you know Laus Deo's history, you will want to share this with everyone you know. These words have been there for many years; they are 555 feet, 5.125 inches high, perched atop the monument, facing skyward to the Father of our nation, overlooking the 69 square miles which comprise the District of Columbia, capital of the United States of America.

Laus Deo! Two seemingly insignificant, unnoticed words. Out of sight and, one might think, out of mind, but very meaningfully placed at the highest point over what is the most powerful city in the most successful nation in the world.

So, what do those two words, in Latin, composed of just four syllables and only seven letters, possibly mean? Very simply, they say 'Praise be to God!'

Though construction of this giant obelisk began in 1848, when James Polk was President of the United States, it was not until 1888 that the monument was inaugurated and opened to the public. It took twenty-five years to finally cap the memorial with a tribute to the Father of our nation, Laus Deo. 'Praise be to God!'

From atop this magnificent granite and marble structure, visitors may take in the beautiful panoramic view of the city with its division into four major segments. From that vantage point, one can also easily see the original plan of the designer, Pierre Charles l'Enfant...a perfect cross imposed upon the landscape, with the White House to the north. The Jefferson Memorial is to the south, the Capitol to the east and the Lincoln Memorial to the west.

A cross you ask? Why a cross? What about separation of church and state? Yes, a cross; separation of church and state was not, is not, in the Constitution. So, read on. How interesting and, no doubt, intended to carry a profound meaning for those who bother to notice.

Praise be to God! Within the monument itself are 898 steps and 50 landings. As one climbs the steps and pauses at the landings the memorial stones share a message.

On the 12th Landing is a prayer offered by the City of Baltimore; on the 20th is a memorial presented by some Chinese Christians; on the 24th a presentation made by Sunday School children from New York and Philadelphia quoting Proverbs 10:7, Luke 18:16 and Proverbs 22:6. Praise be to God!

When the cornerstone of the Washington Monument was laid on July 4th, 1848 deposited within it were many items including the Holy Bible presented by the Bible Society. Praise be to God! Such was the discipline, the moral direction, and the spiritual mood given by the founder and first President of our unique democracy 'One Nation, Under God.'

I am awed by Washington's prayer for America. Have you ever read it? Well, now is your unique opportunity, so read on!

'Almighty God; We make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep the United States in Thy holy protection; that Thou wilt incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government; and entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another and for their fellow citizens of the United States at large. And finally that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without a humble imitation of whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation. Grant our supplication, we beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.' Laus Deo!

When one stops to observe the inscriptions found in public places all over our nation's capitol, he or she will easily find the signature of God, as it is unmistakably inscribed everywhere you look. You may forget the width and height of 'Laus Deo ', its location, or the architects but no one who reads this will be able to forget its meaning, or these words: 'Unless the Lord builds the house its builders labor in vain.

Unless the Lord watches over the city, the watchmen stand guard in vain. Psalm 12 7:1

It is hoped you will send this to every child you know; to every sister, brother, father, mother or friend. They will not find offense, because you have given them a lesson in history that they probably never learned in school. With that, be not ashamed, or afraid, but have pity on those who will never see this because someone failed to send it on.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, They shall prosper that love thee.
Psalm 122:6.
 
Why doesn't the King of Cut and Paste never give credit to the author or his sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
Quote:
Why doesn't the King of Cut and Paste never give credit to the author or his sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif



/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif Can you believe it? Amazing
 
Quote:
Why doesn't the King of Cut and Paste never give credit to the author or his sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif




Because it should be the content that is important rather than the person that said it.

This is the problem these days in this idolization society we live in.
 

"Because it should be the content that is important rather than the person that said it."

But it's the source of the information that determines its reliability. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif For example, if something was printed in the Wall Street Journal and a conflicting story was put out by an Arab news agency ... which would you place more stock in? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif

Additionally, it a matter of courtsey to the original author (in some cases it's a trade mark issue)to give them credit. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

What's your objection to this greg223 .... afraid you might get called out for quoting the tin foil hat wearing, marching around in circles in the basement type sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif
 
Quote:


What's your objection to this greg223 .... afraid you might get called out for quoting the tin foil hat wearing, marching around in circles in the basement type sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif



/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif I just quoted you /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
 
Quote:
But it's the source of the information that determines its reliability.



Actually (ultimately) it's the TRUTH of the information that determines its reliability. Why don't you do a little research? You might be surprised about what you learn concerning the overwhelming volume of references to Christianity embedded in our national (and state) monuments and buildings. This country WAS founded as a Christian nation and on Christian principles. It was every intent of the founding fathers for it to be so. Don't get me started. It'll be a bloodbath.
 
Quote:

"Because it should be the content that is important rather than the person that said it."

But it's the source of the information that determines its reliability. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif For example, if something was printed in the Wall Street Journal and a conflicting story was put out by an Arab news agency ... which would you place more stock in? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif

Additionally, it a matter of courtsey to the original author (in some cases it's a trade mark issue)to give them credit. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

What's your objection to this greg223 .... afraid you might get called out for quoting the tin foil hat wearing, marching around in circles in the basement type sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif



Neither. If something was of interest to me, I would already know the answer through my own research and testing. And that wouldn't be based on one persons work.

If the research and information is accurate, then it doesn't matter who it comes from. For instance, I don't care who wrote our second amendment. I just care that it is followed and understood for what it is.

It doesn't matter to me whether God or my mother said "Though Shalt not Steal" it still means the same to me regardless. It is a principle thing, not an author issue. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
 
Quote:

"Because it should be the content that is important rather than the person that said it."

But it's the source of the information that determines its reliability. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif For example, if something was printed in the Wall Street Journal and a conflicting story was put out by an Arab news agency ... which would you place more stock in? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif

Additionally, it a matter of courtsey to the original author (in some cases it's a trade mark issue)to give them credit. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

What's your objection to this greg223 .... afraid you might get called out for quoting the tin foil hat wearing, marching around in circles in the basement type sources? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliesmack.gif



I actually agree with you on this one ECH--even a broken clock is correct twice each day, lol /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif--it is best to attribute sources.

That said, I can vouch for AZ's character and know he would NEVER knowingly post false info. The problem lies in well-meaning people posting things they got via mass emails that turn out to be 'urban myths,' etc. I have done that personally and had (Was it maybe Rimmy? Somebody here, anyway, I can't remember any more) Snopes me and show I had received and posted a false email. It happens to the best of us!

If you do get something unattributed it is best to Google it and try to cite a legit source in your post.
 
Well for once I too agree with ECH.

During the election I seem to remember some on here getting pretty upset at our resident anti Bush members for posting things without crediting the source or when they did give the source blasting them for its liberal bias.

Not flaming anyone just saying it should work both ways.
 
My, my, my,I had no idea that this post would cause such a stir.I guess I should have known that ech would jump in and start whining.Most of you know that you would be hard pressed to find any post I've ever started without a hyperlink to the article on the site that it came from.Unlike some others here, most particularly a couple of our pet trolls, I rarely forget that part.Please forgive my loss in this case. As for the post, it did indeed originate in an email,thus no link was available.Guess my sin here was a lack of specificity.Prior to posting I did indeed check it out on snopes and while I have strong reservations about their veracity in many cases,they did not discount the bulk of the info contained in the email,therefore I saw no reason to suspect the email myself.Now I suppose some may still want to split hairs over this or that minor detail,but the gist of it is true as best as I or snopes can tell.Would someone please make me aware of the P.M. ruling that I obviously missed stating that all posts must be checked, double checked and checked again for absolute non-mitigating veracity?The problem we have here is 1 socialist,liberal, tree-hugging greenie from Nova Scotia who doesn't like me or my posts,(and the feeling is mutual)and will pick apart anything I post, as well as anything posted by anyone other than walking eagle and daddyrabbit.He's a wannabe pseudo intellectual who cannot reach the I.Q. levels of his two heros and constantly tries to impress them.
Again, please excuse my indiscretion of failing to state it was an email and you may check it out here.......
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/monument.asp
 
Last edited:
The problem we have here is 1 socialist,liberal, tree-hugging greenie from Nova Scotia who doesn't like me or my posts,(and the feeling is mutual)and will pick apart anything I post, as well as anything posted by anyone other than walking eagle and daddyrabbit.He's a wannabe pseudo intellectual who cannot reach the I.Q. levels of his two heros and constantly tries to impress them.

No, actually Amasta, I just like to know where information is coming from ... that's all. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif And in regards to the article in question, I found it very interesting and informative! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

While I certainly like to debate you, I certainly don't hate you or harbour any ill feelings towards you at all. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Does your above noted post mean that I can't come down and stay with you this winter in the trailer park? I was looking forward to some warmer weather.... or does it mean that you will take me out (yote hunting) in the desert and tell me to "look the other way for a moment" bang! LMAO /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top