I own a factory barreled .204 ruger,it has shot 1/2" groups at 100 yrds with my current load (35 grain bergers and H4895 powder).Is it capable of that sized groups at 200 yards?I doubt it.Is it worth the extra cash to go with a wildcat .20 caliber,to bring that half inch group to a quarter inch group? Not to me.But I'm not really a paper shooter anyway.For me reality is what you do with the gun in the field under hunting conditions.And the .204 continues to impress the hell out of me in every way.0-300+ yards it just flat whacks coyotes.If you want to be a world class paper shooter the 20 caliber is probably not the answer.(probaly better off with the 222,22ppc,22br,6ppc)The .204 is probably the most critized caliber out there.Alot of the 22 cal. and up guys claim it doesn't have enough energy to consistently kill coyotes, /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused1.gifalot of the .17 caliber guys say it's to much gun for the serious hide hunters, /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gifand even some of the .20 caliber guys DIS it and say the 20 caliber wildcats are better. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bowingsmilie.gifLOL As for me I am very happy with the accuracy,speed capabilities,knock down,lack of expense both the gun itself and all of the components. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinning-smiley-003.gifThe availability of bullets will come in time.For ME right now it is the perfect calling rifle.FWIW Good Hunting Chad