6.5 Creedmore ????

All of the 6.5's deliver amazing accuracy, and small cases have very little recoil. It is shocking how many people are killing deer/hogs with a 6.5 Grendel!

Shooting has become fun for many again as they realize these small cases do not kick your teeth out!

Ruger/Hornady have done an amazing job developing the 6.5 Creed!
 
Originally Posted By: ackleymanAll of the 6.5's deliver amazing accuracy, and small cases have very little recoil. It is shocking how many people are killing deer/hogs with a 6.5 Grendel!

Shooting has become fun for many again as they realize these small cases do not kick your teeth out!

Ruger/Hornady have done an amazing job developing the 6.5 Creed!



Here is where I am at on the subject, Keith.

This is a circle coming into full commercial production.

Many years ago, the bench crowd took the existing 6mm BR reamer and ran it "long" to chamber for the new 6x47L. Same design, basically, as the 6BR, but longer. They have tuned and fiddled with that design to fit their own interest, but keeping it very close to 6x47L case dimensions.

The 6xc and many other designs were in the mix including the long dasher.

All of this is banging out competition at the highest level. Custom players only.

The 6.5x47L was making a name for itself, obviously, and slowly folks in that long range world were warming up to the Lapua, plus the Wildcats their of.

As a stand alone the Lapua case was very impressive in the small world of long range, either F Class or long range Bench shooting. It inspiered a lot of shooters.

The x47L is basically a long version of the proven BR case. The x47L is also now proven in its own right. Taking its place along side all comers at competition.

However NO domestic gun makers caught on, and none commercially chambered for the X47L design. Yet that design was heavily used to win national championships.

I have a custom in x47L and love it. Spent a pile of cash to get it built and set up too. Awesome cartridge.

Now for the Creedmoor((((((( This cartridge is basically the x47L in Long form. Suttle changes of a couple thou here and there, but just longer. At about x48.8 instead of the x47 in length. It's the same freaking design as the BR just looonger! This is proven to be superior, in general.

Now we have the cat out of the bag and into mainstream production. Multiple gun manufacturers offering, many brass options and nearly all die makers on board. The common guy can buy a rifle from $400 to $2000' over the counter, factory ammo is awesome for both the 6.5 and 6mm. This is the design the big boys were playing with and winning championships with made readily available to the public.

Now we have Lapua, Pederson, and Alpha making brass. Bring on the era of the Creedmoor!
 
Originally Posted By: ackleymanAll of the 6.5's deliver amazing accuracy, and small cases have very little recoil. It is shocking how many people are killing deer/hogs with a 6.5 Grendel!

Shooting has become fun for many again as they realize these small cases do not kick your teeth out!

Ruger/Hornady have done an amazing job developing the 6.5 Creed!

I agree with this. Impact velocity is a real thing and when you start to stretch the range out high BC's retain that velocity. With the 6's and 6.5's (regardless of the headstamp on the the cartridge they are launched from) they can carry that velocity way out there. When you start stepping it up to 7mm's and 30's launching like BC's bullets as the 6 and 6.5's recoil also increases. I personally am not a big fan of recoil and about a 7# all-up rifle in the 280 class with 160's is all I want to shoot. I'll take a 1-8" 6 or 6.5 shooting 100-140gr bullets all day long since they are just much more fun for me to shoot.....and I like to shoot much more than I like to sit on the couch cleaning my rifles. The smaller cases with high BC bullets let me do that.
 
I always figured that I did not need a 6.5. THEN I smoked the barrel on my 6mm Rem and found out that Criterion did no chamber 6mm. I decided that it was time to try something else and since I have gobs of .308 brass, I went with a 24-inch .260. The rifle shoots great, is easy to load for and my 129 Interlocks smash deer. I have two,.308s, two, 7 mags and an 06. The .260 rapidly became my favorite rifle to shoot.

THEN, I inherited a Remington 700, 22-250 that I had no use for. It shot well, but I don't shoot many varmints anymore and so I decided that I would rather have another 6.5. I bought another 24-inch, Criterion, in 6.5 cm. A friend helped me put it on the Rem action and away I went. The rifle shoots every hand load that I have tried into 1/2 moa, and that is only because that is all that my bad shooting eye will allow. I prefer to use it to shoot the longer bullets, due to the better action fit.

There is really nothing with the cm to not like. It fits a handy, short action, has light recoil to make all-day shooting pleasant, is super accurate, is cheap to reload (a real plus for my cheap [beeep])and has a wide array of bullets available. I have shot enough heavy-recoiling rifles to know that a range session with the cm is far more pleasant.

I have officially swallowed the Kool Aid.
 
I'm neither for or against the Creedmoore but I do love these threads. :]

The Creedmoore is to today's gun loonies what Russia is to the Democrats.
 
Originally Posted By: RePeteI'm neither for or against the Creedmoore but I do love these threads. :]

The Creedmoore is to today's gun loonies what Russia is to the Democrats.

There is not doubt, Mr. RePete, that it seems to be consuming some people's lives.

3cT88V4l.jpg
 
Back
Top