$80 BCG's

FYI, those BCGS have 8620 carriers AND bolts

Industry standard & Mil Spec is 9310 or C158 for the bolt and 8620 for the carrier only.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: JoeBobOutfittersFYI, those BCGS have 8620 carriers AND bolts

Industry standard & Mil Spec is 9310 or C158 for the bolt and 8620 for the carrier only.

Doh! lol
ya know someday I would like to upgrade the bolt in my .308 to one of those superwhamadine JP units. I think they run around $300.00!
 
Originally Posted By: HookedOriginally Posted By: JoeBobOutfittersFYI, those BCGS have 8620 carriers AND bolts

Industry standard & Mil Spec is 9310 or C158 for the bolt and 8620 for the carrier only.

Doh! lol
ya know someday I would like to upgrade the bolt in my .308 to one of those superwhamadine JP units. I think they run around $300.00!

JP makes nice BCGs but they're not giving them away by any means.

Originally Posted By: YellowhammerJoebob,

what does that mean actually. I guess I am ignorant.

8620 is a lesser metal than 9310 or C158. Carriers see far less stress than a bolt and aren't really a consumable product outside of a kaboom. Bolts do and will wear out and thus the material of choice for the bolt is typically of a higher end variety. BCGs don't contain a 9310 or C158 carrier due to material costs. It would add substantial unnecessary cost to a BCG to upgrade the carrier to anything above 8620 as it's a great material for that purpose.

9310 is similar to C158 and both are used by the military. 9310 has a slightly higher nickel content so theoretically should be a bit less brittle and therefore may have a slightly longer bolt life. JP's bolts, the ARperformance "superbolt" and many other bolts are made of 9310. C158 is harder for machine shops to source since there is one source. 9310 is typically used for smaller runs of product but is actually a bit more expensive than C158 from what I hear.

8620 isn't as suitable as 9310 or C158 for a bolt. 8620 is the standard for carriers though. 8620 bolts should have a lower round count expectancy. With that said, if it's a low-volume gun then you may never see the difference between the three materials.

The cost difference is typically ~$20 between the "gold standard" BCGs and the 8620 BCGs. I'm honestly not sure why someone would choose to manufacturer bolts with 8620 other than its cheaper to buy and easier/quicker to machine. There's no advantage, other than initial inputs and time to machine, to using 8620 for a bolt.
 
Last edited:
What is the round count on a wore out 8620 bolt from somebody on here that wore one out. I would think rapid extended fire is the real wear on them. But I'm not sure
 
Originally Posted By: CatskinnerWhat is the round count on a wore out 8620 bolt from somebody on here that wore one out. I would think rapid extended fire is the real wear on them. But I'm not sure

C158/9310 bolts are typically recommended to be replaced around 6000 rounds, although some may last much longer than that. Some may last less than that. HPT testing actually can decrease the average bolt life based on testing by manufacturers.

Obviously every bolt is going to wear differently depending on how tight it fits in the barrel extension, the ammo used, etc.
 
Just bought a BCG from JoeBob. His are API tested and made of proper materials. The are properly coated and fasteners staked, etc. For $125, you can't beat em. Far more value there then these disposable BCGs.

http://www.joeboboutfitters.com/JoeBobOutfitters_Premium_Complete_AR15_BCG_p/jb-premiumbcg.htm

Mil-Spec MIL-STD-171 Phosphate Finish
Individually MPI Tested & Engraved.
Bolt: 9310-Case hardened, Shot Peened, and MPI tested.
Carrier: 8620 Tool Steel-(M16 full shroud)-Heat Treated, Case Hardened, & Chrome Lined.
Gas Key: Chrome Lined-Grade 8 Hardened Fasteners, Permatex No. 3 sealed, Torqued to 60 in lbs, & Mil-Spec Staked
Cam Pin: 4340 Steel-Heat Treated & Phosphated
Extractor:Tool steel S7-Heat Treated to 48-53 Rockwell C & Phosphated
Extractor Spring:Upgraded Chrome Silicon. Black Buffer & O-Ring* for Enhanced Reliability.
 
Thanks for the info JoeBobs. I've heard of bolts breaking but I've never saw it. These stronger bolts are something I've only noticed in the last 5 years or so. I'm wondering with the wars going on they've notice something and changed to the stronger ones, or have they always been stronger in the GI bolts? I suppose for plinking or hunting where you take fewer shots with time between them you will be ok. But for professional work its not worth the $20. I wonder if most ar15's sold have the 8620 bolts in now. Sounds like you will shoot the barrel out long before the bolt for an average user.
 
Originally Posted By: CatskinnerThanks for the info JoeBobs. I've heard of bolts breaking but I've never saw it. These stronger bolts are something I've only noticed in the last 5 years or so. I'm wondering with the wars going on they've notice something and changed to the stronger ones, or have they always been stronger in the GI bolts? I suppose for plinking or hunting where you take fewer shots with time between them you will be ok. But for professional work its not worth the $20. I wonder if most ar15's sold have the 8620 bolts in now. Sounds like you will shoot the barrel out long before the bolt for an average user.

The barrel should outlast the bolt by far. The barrel should outlast several bolts before accuracy suffers much.

The MARKETING of BCGs may have changed over the last 5 years but most of the BCGs on the market should be 9310 or C158 unless they're a "commercial" brand that specifies a cheaper bolt from the machine shop making them.

All of your major brands will have 9310 or C158 bolts. JP, Spike's, BCM, Colt, Stag, LMT, Palmetto (for the most part), our house branded ones, Daniel Defense, etc, etc.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. I guess for the amount of usage I'm looking at, material is irrelevant. It's doubtful the build I bought one for will ever see more than 1,500 rounds, and IF it does AND the bolt breaks, the $45 dollars it will cost to replace puts me at the same cost a mil-spec setup would run initially (and that's assuming the big IF).

I'll never be kicking doors in the sandbox and putting down thousands of rounds with my hunting AR. $45 bucks is a big enough difference that I'd rather save the money there and spend more on optics. A better scope will be a lot more critical to my hunting success than what material my bolt is made of. Just my (poor college kid) 2 cents on the subject.
 
Last edited:
Thank you JoeBob, I sat on my hands for several days wanting to type something similar, but glad you educated folks. Keep up the good work.

My opinion, is that its not a matter of wearing out, its a matter of holding up to the pressure. It might work great, but I'm not willing to take the chance on my customers.
 
Originally Posted By: scottmilk9My opinion, is that its not a matter of wearing out, its a matter of holding up to the pressure. It might work great, but I'm not willing to take the chance on my customers.

This is how I feel too. It's not about wearing out, but breaking that worries me. It may be 3000 rounds, it may be 3. But with a quality piece, the likelihood is greatly reduced.
 
Originally Posted By: scottmilk9Thank you JoeBob, I sat on my hands for several days wanting to type something similar, but glad you educated folks. Keep up the good work.

My opinion, is that its not a matter of wearing out, its a matter of holding up to the pressure. It might work great, but I'm not willing to take the chance on my customers.

Yep. At the point of a bolt failure then there is going to be possible collateral damage. If bolt lugs break off then they have to go somewhere and there is going to be a major malfunction inside the action. Ideally you want to swap the bolt PRIOR to it failing.

8620 bolts only popped up because of the banic. Otherwise, the market would have never accepted them, and they still are, hence the ridiculously low price. Palmetto is making pennies on the dollar to try to move overstocked low volume items. Once they are gone, I highly doubt they reorder any. I couldn't see the cost difference being more than a couple dollars but the market price is much lower.

If any big "name-brand" like DD, BCM, Spike's, Colt, etc then they would lose all credibility...and rightfully so. They're not mil-spec and aren't really the point where you should skimp on a build, IMO. ANY bcg an have a premature failure, regardless of material. It could be a hot round that causes an issue, or bore obstruction, poor heat treatment, or even a stress crack. However, the better materials should hold up better over the long-haul.

Materials on barrels matter less than BCG, IMO. 4140CM versus 4150CM for example. 4150 is a better barrel choice, but very few people will outshoot a barrel and 4150 can cost a good bit more. The same could be said for 416 and 416R. IF the accuracy degrades, it will do it in a very slow manner. Nothing should ever break or fail as a barrel goes out. You may go from 1.5" groups to 2.5" groups, but the reliability of the rifle won't be compromised and you'll still have combat accuracy and be minute of coyote at normal ranges. Very few people shoot a coyote rifle 15K rounds though. Prairie dog guns, yes. Competitive shooters, yes.

IIRC:

When they bumped up the 5.56 max pressure a few decades ago that's when they decided it would be beneficial to bump up to C158/9310 from the original 8620 design. The original 5.56 rounds fired in the original AR15's were much weaker and shooting a lighter bullet out of a faster twist barrel. They made the switch on the bolt materials and barrel twist to match the newer faster, heavier loads.

Due to this, its not recommended to shoot modern-day 5.56 through the older bolts and barrels of original M16's. I know that was a major issue when I went through Basic Training in '05. We had some really old M16s we used solely for blank fire that had the original bolts and barrels.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: newmexicokidWondering about the AR Stoner BCG's from MidwayUSA.
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/145235/...gton-parkerized

They say the Carrier is 4130 Chromoly Steel, and I guess the 8620 in the bolt has been adressed already above.

If the choice is between the BCG from Joe Bobs which states without a doubt what it's made of and the testing that is done, OR the one from Midway that doesn't specify what material or testing is used and COST MORE, I know who gets my order.

On top of that, one will ship it FREE. The other, about 2 or 3 times the ACTUAL cost.
smile.gif

 
Bolt arrived today..come in a box large enough to fit two pair of my shoes (size 13).Extremely FRAGILE?
lol.gif

I should have ordered the one from JB awhile back when a charging handle was a bonus with purchase.
I first disassembled and cleaned the bolt up and removed a end mill shaving or two. Lubricated BCG, grabbed the `beater rifle`, a handful of ammo and stepped outside to try it out.
Out of a total of eight rounds it only fired two rounds consecutively on two occasions.
At first glance it looks as if the bolt is not returning forward far enough and it fails to strip a round from the magazine.
I have some other chores to get done but will examine a little further later on this evening.
The bolt was marked MPI and I don't recall ever seeing that on any other of my bolts.
 
I had to revisit this thread/link. Split view bolt visible.
http://www.bushmaster.com/anatomy_bushmaster.asp
After taking the bolt back apart, clean and lubricate then put back together, nothing visible I can see other than inside of carrier (first portion that's just clearance anyway..?)is a little rougher than other brands.
The bolt fit (gas ring tension) is much tighter than others even when others were new IIRC. I `worked it` in n out oh yea...the bolt several times, IDK maybe it just needs a bit of breaking in.?
Definitely get what you pay for huh
frown.gif

Personally, I could not even bring myself to put a better bolt in this carrier YMMV.
I will give it another try tomorrow and if it still does not work then I will call and ask about return policy. I will try a couple different mags too, but this one worked just fine a week ago, same reloads, same rifle, different BCG.
 
Back
Top